View Full Version : Martial Law


PINOY_RADICAL
9th Mar '08 Sun, 21:45
mga kababayan may tanong ako, kaagad ba mapapatupad ng isang pangulo ang martial law o hindi ito kaagad o basta basta mapapatupad?

drx2k
9th Mar '08 Sun, 22:00
hmm.. i think pwedeng agad ipatupad kung baga biglaan.. kasi isa yun sa special power ng isang pangulo

special power ng pangulo ang manggulat:lolcard:

icOn
10th Mar '08 Mon, 01:03
declaring the nation under the state of martial law will not be possible unless one of the following conditions are met:

1. the nation is under imminent threat, either in domestic or foreign form

2. rebellious uprisings in some part of the country which threatens to overpower the current government administration

meron pang 3 & 4, di ko lang maalala :lmao:

pero yung dalawa na sinabi ko, di rin exact words talaga, pero something like that. those were the reasons bakit nag-declare ng martial law si marcos nung 1973. marami na kasi uprisings na nangyayari (yung mga student rallies and the like) and para daw to supress the communist activities in the south. pol sci 101 :D

so i guess that pretty much answers your question papi. :D hindi basta2 pwedeng mag-declare ng martial law ang president nang walang basehan. nasa constitution yun :D

PINOY_RADICAL
13th Mar '08 Thu, 13:18
declaring the nation under the state of martial law will not be possible unless one of the following conditions are met:

1. the nation is under imminent threat, either in domestic or foreign form

2. rebellious uprisings in some part of the country which threatens to overpower the current government administration

meron pang 3 & 4, di ko lang maalala :lmao:

pero yung dalawa na sinabi ko, di rin exact words talaga, pero something like that. those were the reasons bakit nag-declare ng martial law si marcos nung 1973. marami na kasi uprisings na nangyayari (yung mga student rallies and the like) and para daw to supress the communist activities in the south. pol sci 101 :D

so i guess that pretty much answers your question papi. :D hindi basta2 pwedeng mag-declare ng martial law ang president nang walang basehan. nasa constitution yun :D


maraming salamat sa sagot mo kaibigan. susuriin kong mabuti ang sagot mo. :)

renzoy16
4th Apr '08 Fri, 23:21
sa social studies ko nung 1st yr HS ako,.. meron akong nabasa na hindi na wedeng mag.declare ng Martial law ang presidente (under d 1986 constitution)... at kung kailangan man, siguro dapat munang dumaan sa congress kung pwede bang magdeclare ang pres.

Wolf
16th Apr '08 Wed, 01:58
martial law in the phil is not the answer....

CIVIL WAR!!!!!

PINOY_RADICAL
17th Apr '08 Thu, 16:50
martial law in the phil is not the answer....

CIVIL WAR!!!!!

kapayapaan at pagmamahal sa ating inang bayan ang sagot kaibigan.

sabi nga ni John Lennon,

"You say you wanna revolution, well you know, we all wanna change the world! but when you talk about destruction, don't you know that you can't count me out!"

paulzky
17th Apr '08 Thu, 17:02
Yeah! pwede itong ipatupad ni PGMA lalu na't under niya ang mga Arm Forces ngayun...pero syempre hindi agad agad dahil marami ang sasalungat sa kanya...

nybee
17th Apr '08 Thu, 21:42
declaring the nation under the state of martial law will not be possible unless one of the following conditions are met:

1. the nation is under imminent threat, either in domestic or foreign form

2. rebellious uprisings in some part of the country which threatens to overpower the current government administration

meron pang 3 & 4, di ko lang maalala :lmao:

pero yung dalawa na sinabi ko, di rin exact words talaga, pero something like that. those were the reasons bakit nag-declare ng martial law si marcos nung 1973. marami na kasi uprisings na nangyayari (yung mga student rallies and the like) and para daw to supress the communist activities in the south. pol sci 101 :D

so i guess that pretty much answers your question papi. :D hindi basta2 pwedeng mag-declare ng martial law ang president nang walang basehan. nasa constitution yun :D

this one is correct..:thumbsup:..

pero di ibig sabihin na napatupad na eh pwede na....

pagkapatupad nyan, dadalhin yan sa kongreso kung may sapat na grounds ba yung papapatupad nyan, kung meron ok cige, kung wala, ipapatigil ng kongreso, actually pwede pa ngang magextend nyan eh...hehehehehe

turo sa Phil. Government and Const namin last sem..:lol:

PINOY_RADICAL
3rd May '08 Sat, 23:42
this one is correct..:thumbsup:..

pero di ibig sabihin na napatupad na eh pwede na....

pagkapatupad nyan, dadalhin yan sa kongreso kung may sapat na grounds ba yung papapatupad nyan, kung meron ok cige, kung wala, ipapatigil ng kongreso, actually pwede pa ngang magextend nyan eh...hehehehehe

turo sa Phil. Government and Const namin last sem..:lol:

salamat,kaibigan. Tanong ko lang, ano yung grounds na sinasabi mo? Nagtatanong lang kaibigan.

renzoy16
7th May '08 Wed, 17:54
i think the grounds jan is:

may rebellion, invasion or sumthin na ikasisira ng pilipinas,. i think,ahehehe