rentao_15
8th Jun '07 Fri, 17:33
Is love an emotion? Or is it too vast a word to describe or sum up. You hear people talk about love being unconditional and then there are others who talk of using a tough love. Some have a love that is described as toxic and is rejected by their suitors. However love is the one word that is used more than any other, but seems to be the least understood. The Bible tells us that God is love, but people use the word in ways that have nothing to do with Him. The most common connotation for love seems to actually be rooted in selfishness. A 'because of' love, if you will! People who love this way believe that describing and showing love in this way elevates the term (love), but in reality it degrades the term. Divorce exists as an alternative to supposed 'true love', but that makes no sense. Divorce exists primarily because love has been regulated to a mere emotion, and not used in its true form. Most cannot even recognize true love for lack of experience and familiarity. We only 'love' because of what someone can do for us and not for what we can do for, offer and/or sacrifice for them. We approach love purely from what we can get out of it, instead of what we can contribute/give. We take instead of give and we consume instead of produce. If love were merely an emotion, then how do you reconcile it ever being unconditional? Emotions change so frequently, based on things as simple and trivial as the weather and as complex, yet inevitable as tragedy and death. Our emotions feed directly off of our thoughts, so knowing that no one is ever 100 percent right or omniscient, we then have to conclude that our emotions that stem from our thoughts can be just as error-filled. We can feel one way one day and feel the opposite the next. Something or someone else could be affecting how we treat another. We allow our emotions in one situation to spill over into another and then, when we realize what we've been doing we often change back. Yet, with all that possibility for change in our emotions... why would we relegate love to such a fleeting and unstable subject. Love could never be unconditional as an emotion, because it does and can change so much. In order for love to ever be unconditional it would have to be something more stable and solid than emotions...
Love is not an emotion... but it can be felt! Love is a commitment evenly mixed with a choice. I know that definition is neither glamorous nor romantic, but it is the only way that it can be consistent enough to be unconditional. We ought to love, first, because we recognize and have received it, and then because we choose to. In choosing to love we then honor our choice by remaining committed despite the hard times, mistakes, failings and weaknesses. When we remain committed beyond everything, then and only then is our love unconditional. True love is nothing less. A mere emotion pales in comparison with 'true love'. We erroneously love people because of how they make us feel about ourself, instead of because we really love them and are ready to sacrifice or do for them expecting nothing in return. Most people actually lack such a real concept for love that they are not even aware that the word 'charity' is its synonym. When we give to charities we are participating in 'true love'... giving and expecting nothing in return. When we give because we recognize another person's need and not because we hope to get some service, gratitude and/or appreciation, then we have been truly charitable... loving! People's inability to recognize the synonymous nature between the words 'love' and 'charity' actually prove the point that love is woefully misunderstood today. Our national divorce rate is so high as a direct result. However don't get me wrong and assume that my mention of divorce in this context means that it is unwarranted in all cases, it just means that it is being misused, misapplied and abused in most cases.
Love is not an emotion... but it can be felt! Love is a commitment evenly mixed with a choice. I know that definition is neither glamorous nor romantic, but it is the only way that it can be consistent enough to be unconditional. We ought to love, first, because we recognize and have received it, and then because we choose to. In choosing to love we then honor our choice by remaining committed despite the hard times, mistakes, failings and weaknesses. When we remain committed beyond everything, then and only then is our love unconditional. True love is nothing less. A mere emotion pales in comparison with 'true love'. We erroneously love people because of how they make us feel about ourself, instead of because we really love them and are ready to sacrifice or do for them expecting nothing in return. Most people actually lack such a real concept for love that they are not even aware that the word 'charity' is its synonym. When we give to charities we are participating in 'true love'... giving and expecting nothing in return. When we give because we recognize another person's need and not because we hope to get some service, gratitude and/or appreciation, then we have been truly charitable... loving! People's inability to recognize the synonymous nature between the words 'love' and 'charity' actually prove the point that love is woefully misunderstood today. Our national divorce rate is so high as a direct result. However don't get me wrong and assume that my mention of divorce in this context means that it is unwarranted in all cases, it just means that it is being misused, misapplied and abused in most cases.