View Full Version : 10 Weird Religious Practices


twilight
11th May '08 Sun, 00:37
Most religions have one or two unusual practices or devices but occasionally you find one which is just completely weird. This list contains ten of the more unusual things found in modern religions.

1. Mormom Temple Garments Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temple_garments)
http://listverse.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/mormonunderwear-tm.jpg (http://listverse.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/mormonunderwear.jpg)
In some denominations of the Latter Day Saint movement, the temple garment (or the Garment of the Holy Priesthood, or informally, the garment or garments) is a set of sacred underclothing worn by adult adherents who have taken part in a ritual ceremony known as washing and anointing ordinance, usually in a temple as part of the Endowment ceremony. Adherents consider them to be sacred and may be offended by public discussion of the garments. Anti-Mormon activists have publicly displayed or defaced temple garments to show their opposition to the LDS Church.
According to generally-accepted Mormon doctrine, the marks in the garments are sacred symbols (Buerger 2002, p. 58). One proposed element of the symbolism, according to early Mormon leaders, was a link to the “Compass and the Square”, the symbols of freemasonry (Morgan 1827, pp. 22-23), to which Joseph Smith (creator of Mormonism) had been initiated about seven weeks prior to his introduction of the Endowment ceremony.

2. Scientology E-Meter Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emeter)
http://listverse.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/13640446-5e9e5bef7b-1.jpg
An E-meter is an electronic device manufactured by the Church of Scientology at their Gold Base production facility. It is used as an aid by Dianetics and Scientology counselors and counselors-in-training in some forms of auditing, the application of the techniques of Dianetics and Scientology to another or to oneself for the express purpose of addressing spiritual issues.
E-meter sessions are conducted by church employees known as auditors. Scientology materials traditionally refer to the subject as the “preclear,” although auditors continue to use the meter well beyond the clear level. The preclear holds a pair of cylindrical electrodes (”cans”) connected to the meter while the auditor asks the preclear a series of questions and notes both the verbal response and the activity of the meter. Auditor training describes many types of needle movements, with each having their own special significance.
A 1971 ruling of the United States District Court, District of Columbia (333 F. Supp. 357), specifically stated, “The E-meter has no proven usefulness in the diagnosis, treatment or prevention of any disease, nor is it medically or scientifically capable of improving any bodily function.”

3. Exorcism Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Exorcism)
http://listverse.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/exorcism-video-tm.jpg (http://listverse.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/exorcism-video.jpg)
Exorcism is the practice of evicting demons or other evil spiritual entities from a person or place which they are believed to have possessed (taken control of). The practice is quite ancient and still part of the belief system of many religions, though it is seen mostly in the Roman Catholic and Eastern Orthodox Churches.
Solemn exorcisms, according to the Canon law of the church, can only be exercised by an ordained priest (or higher prelate), with the express permission of the local bishop, and only after a careful medical examination to exclude the possibility of mental illness. The Catholic Encyclopaedia (1908) enjoined: “Superstition ought not to be confounded with religion, however much their history may be interwoven, nor magic, however white it may be, with a legitimate religious rite”.
To listen to two authentic recordings of exorcisms, visit the Top 10 Incredible Recordings (http://listverse.com/bizarre/top-10-incredible-recordings/).

4. Jewish Kaparot (כפרות) Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kapparot)
http://listverse.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/b-1630-tm.jpg (http://listverse.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/b-1630.jpg)
Kaparot is a traditional Jewish religious ritual that takes place around the time of the High Holidays. Classically, it is performed by grasping a live chicken by the sholder blades and moving around one’s head three times, symbolically transferring one’s sins to the chicken. The chicken is then slaughtered and donated to the poor, preferably eaten at the pre-Yom Kippur feast. In modern times, Kapparos is performed in the traditional form mostly in Haredi communities. The ritual is preceded by the reading of Psalms 107:17-20 and Job 33:23-24.
On the eve of Yom Kippur 2005, more than 200 caged chickens were abandoned in rainy weather as part of a Kaparot operation in Brooklyn, NY; some of these starving and dehydrated chickens were subsequently rescued (http://archive.recordonline.com/archive/2005/10/22/swinger0.htm) by the American Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals. Jacob Kalish, an Orthodox Jew from Williamsburg, was charged with animal cruelty for the drowning deaths of 35 of these chickens. In response to such reports of the mistreatment of chickens, animal rights organizations have begun to picket public observances of kaparot, particularly in Israel.

5. Shamanism Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shamanism)
http://listverse.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/nyima3.jpg
Shamanism refers to a range of traditional beliefs and practices concerned with communication with the spirit world. There are many variations in shamanism throughout the world, though there are some beliefs that are shared by all forms of shamanism. Its practitioners claim the ability to diagnose and cure human suffering and, in some societies, the ability to cause suffering. This is believed to be accomplished by traversing the axis mundi and forming a special relationship with, or gaining control over, spirits.
Shamans have been credited with the ability to control the weather, divination, the interpretation of dreams, astral projection, and traveling to upper and lower worlds. Shamans were used in Tibetan Buddhism as a form of divination by which the Dalai Lama was given prophesies of the future and advice.

6. Dowry Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dowry)
http://listverse.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/03-1.jpg
This is a cultural practice rather than a religious one. The practice of dowry exists across India. Despite laws against it, the practice continues. The girl child’s dowry and wedding expenses often sends her family into a huge debt trap. As consumerism and wealth increase in India, dowry demands are growing. In rural areas, families sell their land holdings, while the urban poor sell their houses.
To curb the practice of dowry, the government of India made several laws detailing severe punishment to anyone demanding dowry and a law in Indian Penal Code (Section 498A) has been introduced. While it gives boost to a woman and her family, it in the same time also put a man and his family in a great disadvantage. Misuse of this law by women in urban India and many incidents of extortion of money from the husband done by the wife and her family (this is called sowry) have come to light.

7. Mormon Baptism of the Dead Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Baptism_of_the_dead)
http://listverse.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/twelveoxen-bw-tm.jpg (http://listverse.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/twelveoxen-bw.jpg)
Baptism for the dead, vicarious baptism or proxy baptism is a religious practice of baptising a living person on behalf of an individual who is dead; the living person is acting as the deceased person’s proxy. It has been practiced since 1840 in The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints where it is also called temple baptism because it is performed only in dedicated temples.
In the practice of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, a living person, acting as proxy, is baptized by immersion on behalf of a deceased person of the same gender. The baptism ritual is as follows: after calling the living proxy by name, the person performing the baptism says, “Having been commissioned of Jesus Christ, I baptize you for and in behalf of [full name of deceased person], who is dead, in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost. Amen.” The proxy is then immersed briefly in the water. Baptism for the dead is a distinctive ordinance of the church and is based on the belief that baptism is a required ordinance for entry into the Kingdom of God.
The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints vicariously baptizes people regardless of race, sex, or creed. This includes both victims and perpetrators of genocide. Some Jewish survivors of the Holocaust and their supporters have objected to this practice.

8. Jainist Digambaras Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digambaras)
here (http://listverse.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/abhishek2006-020520060209.jpg)
Digambar also spelled Digambara is one of the two main sects of Jainism. Senior Digambar monks wear no clothes, following the practice of Lord Mahavira. They do not consider themselves to be nude — they are wearing the environment. Digambaras believe that this practice represents a refusal to give in to the body’s demands for comfort and private property — only Digambara ascetics are required to forsake clothing. Digambara ascetics have only two possessions: a peacock feather broom and a water gourd.
The native Jain communities of Maharashta, Bundelkhand (MP/UP), Karnataka, Tamil Nadu are all Digambaras. In north India, the Saravagis and the Agrawals are also Digambaras. In Gujarat and Southern Rajasthan, the majority of Jains follow the Svetambara tradition, although some Jain communities of these regions like the Humad are also Digambaras.

9. Islamic Niqab (نِقاب) Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taqiyya)
http://listverse.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/niqab.jpg
A niqab is a veil which covers the face, worn by some Muslim women as a part of sartorial hijab. It is popular in the Arab countries of the Persian Gulf but it can also be found in North Africa, Southeast Asia and the Indian subcontinent.
The niqab is regarded differently by the various schools of Islamic jurisprudence known as madhahab. Some see it as obligatory, or fard , while others see it as recommended, or mustahab, and a few see it as forbidden. The majority of scholars believe hijab is required, but only a few see niqab as required, although this is not the common perception among the general population.

10. Jehovah’s Witnesses Refusal of Blood TransfusionsWikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jehovah%27s_Witnesses_and_blood)
http://listverse.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/jw-1.jpg
A fundamental doctrine of the Jehovah’s Witnesses teaches that the Bible prohibits consumption, storage and transfusion of blood, including in cases of emergency. This doctrine was introduced in 1945, and has been elaborated upon since then. Although accepted by a majority of Jehovah’s Witnesses, evidence indicates a minority does not wholly endorse this doctrine. Facets of the doctrine have drawn praise and criticism from both members of the medical community and Jehovah’s Witnesses alike.
In 1964, Jehovah’s Witnesses were prohibited from obtaining transfusions for pets, from using fertilizer containing blood, and were even encouraged to write to dog food manufacturers to verify that their products were blood-free. Later that year, Jehovah’s Witnesses doctors and nurses were instructed to withhold blood transfusions from fellow Jehovah’s Witnesses. As to administering transfusions to non-members, The Watchtower stated that such a decision is “left to the Christian doctor’s own conscience.”

Lovely Face
16th May '08 Fri, 07:58
Galing.....

Anong basis ng JW para hindi i allow ang blood transfusion in case of emergency???

twilight
3rd Jun '08 Tue, 13:13
Galing.....

Anong basis ng JW para hindi i allow ang blood transfusion in case of emergency???

http://www.ajwrb.org/images/drip.gif

Many Jehovah's Witnesses sincerely believe that it is a gross sin to accept a blood transfusion, since the Bible states that we must "abstain from blood." (Acts 15:29) It is quite understandable that many are confused by the position taken by the Watchtower Society (WTS) with respect to the various blood components or blood products like albumin, (Erythropoietins), vaccines, immunoglobulins, and hemophiliac treatments. It does not seem possible to explain why it is a violation of God's law to accept plasma, platelets, red and white cells when all of the fractions of these are permitted by the WTS. These contradictions have caused a number of elders and Hospital Liaison Committee Members to quietly resign.

Additionally, the trend in recent years has been to allow more and more blood products. The June 15, 2000 Watchtower, Questions From Readers article opened the door to the use of hemoglobin since it is fractionated from red blood cells. This coupled with the WTS statement to the European Commission on Human Rights that their are no "controls or sanctions" for a Witness who accepts blood and that minors may not carry "Advance Medical Directives" prohibiting blood transfusions are significant indications that the WTS may significantly modify their blood policy or abandon it altogether at some point in the future. Additionally, in April of 2000 the WTS admitted that it was no longer disfellowshipping members who accepted blood or prohibited blood components.

http://www.ajwrb.org/images/tube.gif


Watchtower Blood policy in 1961:
“If you have reason to believe that a certain product contains blood or a blood fraction…if the label says that certain tablets contain hemoglobin…this is from blood...a Christian knows, without asking, that he should avoid such a preparation. - The Watchtower 11/01/1961, p. 669

Is it wrong to sustain life by administering a transfusion of blood or plasma or red cells or others of the component parts of the blood? Yes!...the prohibition includes "any blood at all." - Blood, Medicine and the Law of God, 1961, pp. 13, 14

http://www.ajwrb.org/images/oldcardA.gif

Watchtower Blood policy in 2006:
"...when it comes to fractions of any of the primary components, each Christian, after careful and prayerful meditation, must conscientiously decide for himself."
The Watchtower 2000; June 15:29-31
See also Watchtower Advance Directive, page 11, 1.3(b) (http://www.ajwrb.org/2003WThealthcaredocs.pdf)

http://www.ajwrb.org/images/bloodchartA.jpg

Change from 1961 or no change?

AJWRB has documented numerous changes (http://www.ajwrb.org/history/index.shtml#modern) in the Watchtower's blood policy over the years. If you are a Jehovah's Witness and want additional confirmation of these facts, you should ask an elder who is an HLC member or phone the WT Society (718) 560-5000. Don't permit your loved one to die unnecessarily.

If you find the Watcthower's position difficult to make sense of, you are not alone. To learn more, read, "Why some Jehovah's Witnesses accept blood and conscientiously reject official Watchtower Society blood policy" by Lee Elder (Journal of Medical Ethics) - To read click here (http://www.ajwrb.org/physicians/Lee-JME2000/375.html)

These JW kids died prematurely - do you know why?
http://www.ajwrb.org/images/dak100x137.jpg
(http://www.ajwrb.org/experiences/mary.shtml) http://www.ajwrb.org/images/slisa1.jpg http://www.ajwrb.org/images/sadrian1.jpg http://www.ajwrb.org/images/swyndhm1.jpg http://www.ajwrb.org/images/slenae1.jpg



"In former times thousands of youths died for putting God first. They are still doing it, only today the drama is played out in hospitals and courtrooms, with blood transfusions the issue."
Awake! - May 22, 1994, p.2 (Official Jehovah's Witness publication)

http://www.ajwrb.org/smkids.gif

Medical ethics: blood transfusions

Jehovah's Witnesses refuse blood transfusions, including autologous transfusions in which a person has their own blood stored to be used later in a medical procedure, (though some Witnesses will accept autologous procedures such as dialysis or cell salvage in which their blood is not stored) and the use of packed RBCs (red blood cells), WBCs (white blood cells), plasma or platelets.
Witnesses believe that God has forbidden this in Bible passages such as:
Only flesh with its soul-its blood-you must not eatGenesis 9:3-4Abstain from ... fornication and from what is strangled and from bloodActs 15:19-21Accepting a blood transfusion willingly and without regret is seen as a sin. The Witness concerned would no longer be regarded as one of Jehovah's Witnesses.
This refusal to accept blood makes some operations more dangerous and causes some doctors considerable anxiety. Witnesses are willing to absolve doctors of responsibility by signing forms with appropriate wording such as:
As a member of the religious body of Jehovah's Witnesses, I categorically refuse the use of foreign blood or blood components during my surgery. I am aware that the planned and needed procedure thus has a higher risk due to bleeding complications. After receiving thorough explanation particularly about that, I request that the needed surgery be performed without using foreign blood or blood components.Doctors generally feel that respect for the patient's autonomy requires that this wish should be obeyed. They have sound legal reasons for this too, as to administer blood in the face of refusal by a patient may be unlawful and could lead to criminal and/or civil proceedings.
Many Jehovah's Witnesses carry a signed and witnessed advance directive card absolutely refusing blood and releasing doctors from any liability arising from this refusal.
There have been cases where doctors have gone to court to get permission to give blood to children against the wishes of parents who are Jehovah's Witnesses.
Cell-free blood products, containing haemoglobin but not red blood cells have recently become available and may be acceptable for some Jehovah's Witnesses.
Although Jehovah's Witnesses cannot accept blood, they are open to other medical procedures. Jehovah's Witness Hospital Liaison Committees maintain lists of doctors who are prepared to be consulted with a view to treatment without the use of blood transfusion. This has eased many of the tensions related to the issue.
In 2000 the Witnesses changed the rules on blood transfusions so that the Church would no longer take action against a Witness who willingly and without regret underwent a blood transfusion. Some people wrongly interpreted the change as meaning that Witnesses could now accept blood. But the actual change was just that the Church would not take disciplinary action against that Witness.
This was because the Church had no need to take action; the Witness concerned would no longer be viewed as one of Jehovah's Witnesses because he no longer accepted and followed a core tenet of the faith - i.e. the act of accepting a blood transfusion stopped a person being a Witness, without any further action by the Church.
If the Witness later changes their mind and repents of their action they can return to the Church.
Of course, if a Witness is transfused against their will, this is not regarded as a sin on the part of the individual. Children who are transfused against their parents' wishes are not rejected or stigmatised in any way.



Debating the medical ethics

A case involving a Witness with acute myeloid leukaemia is discussed by a panel of experts from clinical ethics committees in hospitals around the UK.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/images/f/btn_listen.gif (http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/science/rams/ethicscommittee_20050511.ram)
http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/images/f/btn_read.gif (http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/science/ethicscommittee_tr1.shtml)

Listen to the debate (45 mins) (http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/science/rams/ethicscommittee_20050511.ram)


The standard treatment is high dose chemotherapy to kill the cancerous blood cells. A crucial part of this involves replenishing the blood system, which is destroyed as a side effect of the chemotherapy. But Jehovah's Witnesses do not accept blood products and are prepared to die rather than compromise their belief.
The patient, rather than refusing treatment entirely, he asked for the chemotherapy to be administered with alternatives to blood products, which are more expensive. The nursing staff were extremely distressed by the situation. They felt that it was unethical to give him chemotherapy because in the absence of blood support it was likely to fail, and could even hasten his death.


Can a patient demand a partial treatment that the doctor considers futile and could even cause them harm?
Patients have the right to refuse a treatment, but does he have a right to refuse part of it?
If the patient's wishes are paramount, is the emotional impact on the nursing staff as important?
Should a patient, on religious grounds or otherwise, have the right to more expensive treatment than others?


http://www.ajwrb.org/hemopureimage.jpg


Watchtower Society approves Hemopure for Jehovah's Witnesses (http://www.ajwrb.org/basics/hemopure.shtml)

(http://www.ajwrb.org/basics/hemopure.shtml)
In a truly remarkable development, the Watchtower Society has ruled that a new oxygen carrying solution made from cow's blood can be used by (JWs) Jehovah's Witnesses. This despite the Watchtower Society's purported biblical ban on the storage/use of animal blood. Nonetheless, members may not pre deposit their own blood or even use certain tiny human blood products like platelets that are frequently required during chemotherapy.

nybee
10th Jun '08 Tue, 05:35
gusto ko sana tignan yung sa hell at sa exorcism...kaso natatakot ako....:weep:

gerrycho
10th Jun '08 Tue, 05:42
bigat talaga ng religion...
sometimes i wish -- God would just say

"You guys are really screwing up what i meant..."

but that would be scary as well noh?

twilight
18th Jun '08 Wed, 05:58
gusto ko sana tignan yung sa hell at sa exorcism...kaso natatakot ako....:weep:

don't be afraid.. :comfort:

bigat talaga ng religion...
sometimes i wish -- God would just say

"You guys are really screwing up what i meant..."

but that would be scary as well noh?

:yes:

jericjed
9th Aug '08 Sat, 22:51
Wierd nga...

alkhains992
13th Aug '08 Wed, 07:23
Complicated.. But in that way god will test us in seeking truth we cannot just enter paradise in easy way.. pinaghihirapan yan tol... we are created not to not to luster our life... we are created to worship HIM alone...:)

dave_england03
13th Aug '08 Wed, 07:35
Yo! haha.. ex-communicado ako, Jehovah's Witness. I dont think many JW died prematurely. siguro grave lang ang situation nila kaya natuluyan sila. YES! We put God first and we follow bible from cover to cover. I have even faced a 50/50 nun bata pa ako nun nagkaroon ako ng dengue. Kahit bata pa ako nun, di ako takot mamatay. Kasi we always look forward to 'live in the paradise.' Pero.. Medical Advancement has it. Instead of using blood, Ginamitan nila ako nun ng PLASMA EXPANDER. For obvious reasons kaya di sya ganun kakilala kasi mahal sya. hehe.. Avoid lang talaga kami sa mga dugo, taken by mouth, or injected on your veins, sacred ang dugo sa amin. Though di na ko JW due to some personal reasons, i still follow some practices na sa tingin kong tama. :D peace.

add ko lang sa isa pa sa di ko rin ginagawa eh yung manumpa sa watawat, sing the national anthem. we follow this verse.

Exodus 20:4-5 (New International Version)

4 "You shall not make for yourself an idol in the form of anything in heaven above or on the earth beneath or in the waters below. 5 You shall not bow down to them or worship them; for I, the LORD your God, am a jealous God, punishing the children for the sin of the fathers to the third and fourth generation of those who hate me,

What does our flag have that is "anything in heaven above?."


Nice share.