- Messages
- 709
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 26
Im on it. just wait for the new link.
Most of our features and services are available only to members, so we encourage you to login or register a new account. Registration is free, fast and simple. You only need to provide a valid email. Being a member you'll gain access to all member forums and features, post a message to ask question or provide answer, and share or find resources related to mobile phones, tablets, computers, game consoles, and multimedia.
All that and more, so what are you waiting for, click the register button and join us now! Ito ang website na ginawa ng pinoy para sa pinoy!
Bago lang po ako dito... may tanong lang po ako sa mga atheista dito... anu po patunay o ebidensya ninyo na walang diyos... base po ba ito sa personal na experience ninyo? Panu kung mali kayo at meron ngang diyos.
burden of proof fallacyBago lang po ako dito... may tanong lang po ako sa mga atheista dito... anu po patunay o ebidensya ninyo na walang diyos... base po ba ito sa personal na experience ninyo?.
eh, pascal's wager.....Panu kung mali kayo at meron ngang diyos
burden of proof fallacy
eh, pascal's wager.....
Bago lang po ako dito... may tanong lang po ako sa mga atheista dito... anu po patunay o ebidensya ninyo na walang diyos... base po ba ito sa personal na experience ninyo? Panu kung mali kayo at meron ngang diyos.
can you prove something that don't exist?why make coclusion about god's non existence without proper and objective investigation by yourself. Anyway, There is a 3 sides to every story. Yours, mine, and the truth.
naiintindihan mo ba ang pascal's wager?you mean conciously hindi ka naniniwala but subconciously ay naniniwala kang may diyos?
can you prove something that don't exist?
naiintindihan mo ba ang pascal's wager?
welcome sa symbianize.
ganito lang yun sir. kapag wala wala talaga. ano bang maipapakita kung wala?.. wala nga e.
kasalanan ba namin kung binigyan niya kami ng isip na ganito?..
can you prove zeus, vishnu, brahma, shiva, and other gods that they do not exist? can you prove rainbow unicorns do not exist? can you prove a negative? the point is you don't have to prove a negative, the burden of proof relies on the positive claim. bakit paniniwalaan ang walang namang maipakitang factual evidence? i know, me and you don't believe in mother goose, humpty dumpty, coz there is no evidence to believe in them.How can you prove it don't exist?
so bakit mo pala tinanong, "paano kung mali kami at meron ngang diyos".... para mo rinn pinapahiwatig na since we do not believe that there is a god, we will go to an eternal damnation. so for you, your best bet is to believe in a god (just to be safe) even though you can't show a factual evidence that your god actually exist.of course i do... pascal's wager=Is it safer to believe in God
even if there is no proof that one exists?
"If you believe in God and turn out to be incorrect, you have lost nothing -- but if you don't believe in God and turn out to be incorrect, you will go to hell. Therefore it is foolish to be an atheist." Paraphrase of Pascal's Wager.
panahon pa ni mahoma ang pag iisip ni blaise pascal so obselete na yun wala na ba bago... naging belief system lang ni pascal yun adapted nyo na agad may sarili ka pag iisip di ba gamitin natin at imbestigahan ang mga bagay bagay kung may katotohanan o wala.
^ yan ang hirap eh men,
sa Pascal's Wager palagi natin ini-include na walang mawawala kung maniniwala. You don't see past the glitz na nawawala din ang God-like attributes ni God dahil He condemns people forever in Hell.
in my POV, a less forgiving God is a lesser God. Therefore He's not God anymore.
Actually, since I became a christian (from catholic origin), hell is not issue anymore because of grace... I really wonder paulit ulit na yang sinasabi
Are you believer before sir? are you making excuses?
How can you prove it don't exist?
of course i do... pascal's wager=Is it safer to believe in God
even if there is no proof that one exists?
"If you believe in God and turn out to be incorrect, you have lost nothing -- but if you don't believe in God and turn out to be incorrect, you will go to hell. Therefore it is foolish to be an atheist." Paraphrase of Pascal's Wager.
panahon pa ni mahoma ang pag iisip ni blaise pascal so obselete na yun wala na ba bago... naging belief system lang ni pascal yun adapted nyo na agad may sarili ka pag iisip di ba gamitin natin at imbestigahan ang mga bagay bagay kung may katotohanan o wala.
Actually, since I became a christian (from catholic origin), hell is not issue anymore because of grace... I really wonder paulit ulit na yang sinasabi
Are you believer before sir? are you making excuses?
Well kung iyan belief mo i respect it...can you prove zeus, vishnu, brahma, shiva, and other gods that they do not exist? can you prove rainbow unicorns do not exist? can you prove a negative? the point is you don't have to prove a negative, the burden of proof relies on the positive claim. bakit paniniwalaan ang walang namang maipakitang factual evidence? i know, me and you don't believe in mother goose, humpty dumpty, coz there is no evidence to believe in them.
so bakit mo pala tinanong, "paano kung mali kami at meron ngang diyos".... para mo rinn pinapahiwatig na since we do not believe that there is a god, we will go to an eternal damnation. so for you, your best bet is to believe in a god (just to be safe) even though you can't show a factual evidence that your god actually exist.
since sabi mo may sarili kang pag-iisip, bakit hindi mo itanong sa sarili mo, "Paano nga kung merong diyos, at hindi sya ang diyos na pinapaniwalaan ko?"
the truth, suffice to say, only becomes true to the extent of your belief. and belief changes from person to person.Well kung iyan belief mo i respect it...
Finding truth is not so hard; what is hard is not to run away from truth once you have found it... buksan mo lang puso mo at isipan folks...
Is that so... ok i ask you this what is the omega point of our evolution and existence here? para ba tayong mga kabute na basta na lang sumulpot sa ibabaw ng mundo, sayang lang pala katalinuhan mo kung mauuwi lang sa alikabok.
tnx thx....hehe tagal ko nga na-hiatusmatagal na yan dito si raven_mk3_18.
welcome back sir.
welcome sa symbianize.
ganito lang yun sir. kapag wala wala talaga. ano bang maipapakita kung wala?.. wala nga e.
kung mali ako/kami. wala ako nakikitang problema. lalo na kung ang god na kinikilala niyo ay totoong OMNIPOTENT, OMNISCIENT AT OMNIBELEVOLENT.. kasi kung magagalit sya at paparusahan kaming mga hindi naniwala sa kanya, e wala syang pinagkaiba sa mga taong seloso at makasarili at hindi mapang-unawa.
kasalanan ba namin kung binigyan niya kami ng isip na ganito?..
it's a non-belief. you can have all the truth, but can you show it as a FACT! show me your god!Well kung iyan belief mo i respect it...
Finding truth is not so hard; what is hard is not to run away from truth once you have found it... buksan mo lang puso mo at isipan folks...
so what kung masasayang ang talino ko, that's why habang ako ay nabubuhay, i'll make my life worth it and give a purpose to its existence.Is that so... ok i ask you this what is the omega point of our evolution and existence here? para ba tayong mga kabute na basta na lang sumulpot sa ibabaw ng mundo, sayang lang pala katalinuhan mo kung mauuwi lang sa alikabok.
Dear Robotculator, what do you mean by hindi ka umasa sa science kaya ka naging atheist dahil logic lang talaga ginamit mo?
sa post mong ito, ang sabi mo:
ang pag-aaral ng Physics ay bahagi ng science.
sounds contradicting to me.
How do you define science, by the way?