Atheists and Agnostics Meeting Place

[pcruztemp]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_Tōhoku_earthquake_and_tsunami
Soil liquefaction in Koto, Tokyo. Walang tsunami sa tokyo

tokyo tower with bent tip due to quake

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tokyo_Tower

tokyo tower is 333 meters high so imagine nyo nalang how a tsunami could rech that high

 

[PINOY_RADICAL]

Yeah, of course. What else could "facepalm" mean? Could you be that dumb that you would you really think i wouldn't know what you meant?

BUT STILL. THAT WAS THE BEST "REPLY" YOU GAVE ME SO FAR.

Your other replies are as "naive" as that of a toddler. There are lessons you got to learn in life... bitter as it may seem, but they are REAL.

"In the Philippines (as in other similar countries as well), it's not "WHAT" you know but "WHOM" you know"...
"In this world, there is no "RIGHT or WRONG"...just "SUPPORTED or NOT"...
"What is BAD for the herbivore is GOOD for the carnivore and vice versa"...
"Win the battle and lose the war"...

ETC...ETC...ETC...

Live longer and experience them yourself, IDEALIST.

LOL! *facepalm*

 

[lavaboy]

but you can be both idealist and realist, just make sure your ideals compromises and sync with reality

Well, acceptable if you put it that way. But technically that's already a hybrid.

You can over pour "realism" in your menu as much as you like but not any gram more of "idealism" than necessary. That "food " would not be edible anymore.

 

[sivre009]

Makikisingit lang po

Eto po pala, isang pinasimpleng explanation ng Cyber Crime Law.
http://www.philstar.com/Photo.aspx?articleid=856315

 

[kmadz]

that website makes several fantastic claims. one is that there was a quake yes but only 6.0 then the tsunami was triggered by a nuke. this raises questions like how did the people who triggered the nuke know that there would be an earthquake? and how come the tsunami waves were 6 feet in hawaii and 3 feet in california when even the big nuclear tests at bikini atoll did not cause such distant tsunamis. And with all the seismic stations around the world, how come they were able to fake the 9.0 in the seismograph records? Control ba nila lahat ng tao sa mundo?


there's even a challenge

http://en.ce.cn/subject/japanquake/photo/201103/12/t20110312_22292114_4.shtml

http://www.chinasmack.com/2011/stories/2011-japan-sendai-earthquake-chinese-netizen-reactions.html

Great Kanto Highway in Naka
http://www.firstthings.com/blogs/fi...highway-department-has-some-explaining-to-do/

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...thquake-Road-repaired-SIX-days-destroyed.html

from the cleannness of the surroundings and the intact trees/bushes, you can see it was not hit by tsunami

and japan has high construction standards so its no wonder damage from the earthquake itself is limited







no different from email spam. You consciously or unconsciously are using this tactic: you expose your so called information to a large number of people and since the internet's costs are low and the reach is wide, even if a small percentage bite at your bait, its enough. Fishing for converts eka nga

Quotes
Hey hey hey bakit mo pinopost mga pictures na yan dito?i dont have to answer all of that kasi hindi naman ako ang nag investigate nyan.If you read that spam msg as you called it.don mo ipost mga pictures na yan para masagot nya.

 

[sevenshadows]

^

Peace on earth.

 

[PINOY_RADICAL]

facepalm talaga! porket maraming population, mahirap na agad? sa Japan, mas marami pa ang population kesa sa Philippines pero mas mayaman pa sila kesa sa atin. Nasa economic policies yan ng isang bansa.

 

[lavaboy]

^There you go again generalizing terms...

We are not simply talking about "population" per se, we are talking about "working population". Yung may silbi!

Now don't throw back the "work" problem to the government. Whether it's their fault or not, the population increase in the "below poverty line" group would be the biggest percentage in the over population growth in the immediate future.

How can you solve a "leaking pail" problem if the outflow is greater than the inflow? You want the government to produce more water? Sure, if they could do that immediately (try getting in their own shoe, hero). But if you practically can't find more water source for the moment (don't tell me they're withholding something so simple on purpose), plugging the biggest hole is the best FIRST-AID to reduce the leak.

WALANG INDIVIDUAL RIGHT (AT KARAPATANG MABUHAY) ANG MGA NILALANG NA AAPAK AT SISIRA SA INDIVIDUaL RIGHT NG IBANG MAS RESPONSABLE!!!

At ang mga "mas responsable" ay may kakayanan na "ikutan" kung anu mang restriction ang ibinibigay ng batas na yan dahil sila may "kapangyarihan/pera/responsibilidad at KARAPATAN" galing sa sarili nilang pagsisikap.

Hindi yung aanak-anak ka tapos sa gobyerno ka aasa! Pati kalupaan ng iba, aangkinin mong karapatan mo, eh kaya ka walang pera eh dahil isinilang ka ng magulang mo na parang hayop, at nabuhay na parang hayop, dahil napakaraming nyong magkakapatid at hindi na maitaguyod "decently" ng mga mala-hayop mong magulang, dahil ineexcercise nila ang "individual right" nilang mag-anak ng mag-anak.

Tanung: Ano ang "ideal fertility rate" ng isang bansa (appropriately: ano ang ideal population growth rate ng isang bansa)?
Sagot: Itanong mo sa mga economist na nagformulate ng RH BILL... I'm sure it is based on a PER CAPITA INCOME ratio, or GNP or something related. Although I'm not an economist, I can bet my ass, Japan has far higher values than the Philippines.

 

[PINOY_RADICAL]

^ *facepalm*

my point here is that ang pagkakaroon ng sound economic policies ang mas effective or alternative na solution sa tinatawag ninyong overpopulation.

 

[pcruztemp]

^ *facepalm*

my point here is that ang pagkakaroon ng sound economic policies ang mas effective or alternative na solution sa tinatawag ninyong overpopulation.

that may be correct. however, that assumes an IDEAL situation. In the real world, we are often forced to to use non ideal solutions for various reasons

 

[PINOY_RADICAL]

that may be correct. however, that assumes an IDEAL situation. In the real world, we are often forced to to use non ideal solutions for various reasons

economic liberalization, reducing the cost of doing business are both sound economic policies since they will make this country more attractive for both local and foreign investors -- It will probably increase Foreign direct investment (FDI).
I don't think ma-a-achieve ng Japan, HK, SG and even China kung saan ang economy nila ngayon kung wala ang mga 'yan --esp. economic freedom w/c is walang ganyan dito sa bansa.

Hindi niyo ba maintindihan... poverty is an economic issue/problem, kaya it can only be solved by sound, practical economic solutions. Addressing the increased family size among the poor is NOT enough.

In the real world, we are often forced to to use non ideal solutions for various reasons

yeah without even understanding the negative, unintended consequences of your actions.

 

[Juan Tamad]

economic liberalization, reducing the cost of doing business are both sound economic policies since they will make this country more attractive for both local and foreign investors -- It will probably increase Foreign direct investment (FDI).
I don't think ma-a-achieve ng Japan, HK, SG and even China kung saan ang economy nila ngayon kung wala ang mga 'yan --esp. economic freedom w/c is walang ganyan dito sa bansa.

Hindi niyo ba maintindihan... poverty is an economic issue/problem, kaya it can only be solved by sound, practical economic solutions. Addressing the increased family size among the poor is NOT enough.



yeah without even understanding the negative, unintended consequences of your actions.

... kaya nga dapat gumawa ng "sound, practical economic solution",

...

...

...

... at "magpasa ng RH Bill"

... hindi ba maintindihan?

 

[PINOY_RADICAL]

... kaya nga dapat gumawa ng "sound, practical economic solution",

...

...

...

... at "magpasa ng RH Bill"

... hindi ba maintindihan?

Killing RP’s Industry and Small Business with the RH Bill

I suggest you to read this article first(to know where I'm coming from) -- then we can debate.

ni hindi niyo nga alam ang mga negative, unintended consequences ng RH Bill eh. Typical RH Bill FANATICS.

 

[maxgreen099]

I don't know how your statement address my point.

ayan ang sinasabi mo double standard don't get me wrong dude

 

[maxgreen099]

ang problema sa proposed crime na 'yan na Malicious disinformation, it's VAGUE, it's BROAD just like the online libel clause sa cyber crime law w/c is open to many interpretations na magagamit ng mga pro-rh bill na pulitiko para makapag-institutionalize ng pang-aabuso na mag-va-violate sa freedom of speech ng iba. Paano kung ipagkakalat ko or i-eexpose ko yung mga negative, unintended consequences ng RH Bill(if ever enacted) --particularly sa industry at sa mga small business dito sa bansa??Would I be held liable for that? remember: the Malicious disinformation provision, is VAGUE, it's BROAD. Binibigyan niyo lang ng coercive power ang mga pulitiko na 'yan para i-violate ang freedom of speech niyo.

parang ganito: ang sinomang ipagkakalat at i-eexpose na ang religion mo ay MALI, ipakukulong mo at gagawing kriminal.

i see nothing wrong bro, kaw lang gumagawa ng multo dito sa sec 28 e at sa cybercrimelaw na gusto mo sabihin na double standard

 

[maxgreen099]

God still loves the atheists even if they deny Him. God's love is for all.

if god loves us ipasa na ang rh bill

 

[PINOY_RADICAL]

^ *facepalm*

 

[maxgreen099]

^ *facepalm*

are you mad?

 

[Juan Tamad]

Killing RP’s Industry and Small Business with the RH Bill

I suggest you to read this article first(to know where I'm coming from) -- then we can debate.

ni hindi niyo nga alam ang mga negative, unintended consequences ng RH Bill eh. Typical RH Bill FANATICS.

... so, "concern" ka pala sa "kapakanan" ng mga "job creators (sambahin ang ngalan nila)"?

... so, tinututulan mo ang "kabuuan" ng RH Bill dahil sa may "bahagi" ito na makakasama sa "job creators (sambahin ang ngalan nila)"?

... so, kahit pa "may idudulot na mabuti" ang RH Bill, tutol ka pa rin dahil "makakasama" ito sa "job creators (sambahin ang ngalan nila)"?


... narinig mo na ba ang salitang "amend"?


... brod, sa usapin ng,

... "pansariling interes mo" vs. "pansariling interes ko" vs. "pansariling interes niya",

... "hindi pwedeng interes mo lang ang masusunod",


... at tigilan na ang paggamit ng "pananakot",

... na "magsasara negosyo", "mawawalan ng trabaho",


... dahil,

... kapag ba nagsara ang "pagawaan ng sabon",

... mawawala na rin ba ang "pangangailangan sa sabon"?

... hangga't "may pangangailangan", "may gagawa",

... ngayon, kung ayaw mo o ng kaibigan mo na gumawa ng sabon,

... may ibang gagawa,

... so, "may oportunidad para sa iba",


... at para sa iba na ito,

... maaaring para sa kanila,

... oks lang na "mabawasan" ang kita nila para sa "kapakinabangan ng mga patay-gutom"

 

[PINOY_RADICAL]

... so, "concern" ka pala sa "kapakanan" ng mga "job creators (sambahin ang ngalan nila)"?

... so, tinututulan mo ang "kabuuan" ng RH Bill dahil sa may "bahagi" ito na makakasama sa "job creators (sambahin ang ngalan nila)"?

... so, kahit pa "may idudulot na mabuti" ang RH Bill, tutol ka pa rin dahil "makakasama" ito sa "job creators (sambahin ang ngalan nila)"?


... narinig mo na ba ang salitang "amend"?

*facepalm*

... brod, sa usapin ng,

... "pansariling interes mo" vs. "pansariling interes ko" vs. "pansariling interes niya",

... "hindi pwedeng interes mo lang ang masusunod",


... at tigilan na ang paggamit ng "pananakot",

... na "magsasara negosyo", "mawawalan ng trabaho",


... dahil,

... kapag ba nagsara ang "pagawaan ng sabon",

... mawawala na rin ba ang "pangangailangan sa sabon"?

... hangga't "may pangangailangan", "may gagawa",

... ngayon, kung ayaw mo o ng kaibigan mo na gumawa ng sabon,

... may ibang gagawa,

... so, "may oportunidad para sa iba",


... at para sa iba na ito,

... maaaring para sa kanila,

... oks lang na "mabawasan" ang kita nila para sa "kapakinabangan ng mga patay-gutom"

yes, hindi pwedeng interes mo lang ang masusunod. Under RH Bill, mapipilitan ang mga employers, businessman na against sa rh bill na i-provide ang rh care services ng mga workers nila(against their will).

let me inform you(for the record). I am for limited government, kaya against ako sa rh bill. Agree ako sa argument ng mga libertarian against the rh bill. But just to be clear. I am not a libertarian.