- Messages
- 428
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 26
God still loves the atheists even if they deny Him. God's love is for all.
Most of our features and services are available only to members, so we encourage you to login or register a new account. Registration is free, fast and simple. You only need to provide a valid email. Being a member you'll gain access to all member forums and features, post a message to ask question or provide answer, and share or find resources related to mobile phones, tablets, computers, game consoles, and multimedia.
All that and more, so what are you waiting for, click the register button and join us now! Ito ang website na ginawa ng pinoy para sa pinoy!
"Overpopulation causes poverty" or "Poverty causes over-population"?
So what comes first: "The chicken or the egg?"
The answer:
It doesn't matter! If you want any ("poverty" or "over-population") to stop, KILL ONE! Kill either the chicken or the egg! ON with the RHBILL and KILL THE CHICKEN!!! (or is it the egg?)
NATURE DICTATES THERE SHOULD BE BALANCE... PROPHYLAXIS OR WAR? CHOOSE ONE...
No, rapid population growth does not cause poverty..
it goes to the other way around.. it's poverty that causes population to grow..
although ang pagdami ng population can have the capacity to aggravate poverty.
My point here is: ang pagdami ng population ay actually isang symptom(rather than a cause) of low national output and poor economic performance.
kung naniniwala kayo na ang "pagdami ng populasyon ay isa rin sa mga sanhi ng Poverty then ano ang ideal fertility rate para sa bansa? tell me.
hindi kailangan ang RH bill para makatulong ka sa mga mahihirap. let me tell you I don't agree with "social justice", "positive rights" but it does not mean I don't agree with helping other people.
"kawalan ng makakain" ba ang "nag-uudyok" sa "kalibugan"?
itanong mo sa mga squatter.
@juan tamad,
rh bill violates the secular morality. right?
"A “morally right”
action must, first and foremost, preserve one’s autonomy —
allowing the individual to freely
make decisions and engage in
behavior according to their
personal wants and desires, so
long as it does NOT infringe on the autonomy of others."
sabi mo ayos lang ang kabaklaan basta wala sila tinatapakan o inaargabyado na ibang tao, kapag nag-anak ba ako ng madami tinapakan o inargabyado ba kita? pinwersa ba kita?
at dahil sa batas na yan PWERSAHAN din ako babawasan ng tax.
"A “morally wrong” action must:
Deny one’s autonomy —
preventing the individual from
freely make decisions and
engaging in behavior according to
their personal wants and desires."
ang problema sa proposed crime na 'yan na Malicious disinformation, it's VAGUE, it's BROAD just like the online libel clause sa cyber crime law w/c is open to many interpretations na magagamit ng mga pro-rh bill na pulitiko para makapag-institutionalize ng pang-aabuso na mag-va-violate sa freedom of speech ng iba. Paano kung ipagkakalat ko or i-eexpose ko yung mga negative, unintended consequences ng RH Bill(if ever enacted) --particularly sa industry at sa mga small business dito sa bansa??Would I be held liable for that? remember: the Malicious disinformation provision, is VAGUE, it's BROAD. Binibigyan niyo lang ng coercive power ang mga pulitiko na 'yan para i-violate ang freedom of speech niyo.
parang ganito: ang sinomang ipagkakalat at i-eexpose na ang religion mo ay MALI, ipakukulong mo at gagawing kriminal.
Yeah, of course. What else could "facepalm" mean? Could you be that dumb that you would you really think i wouldn't know what you meant?
BUT STILL. THAT WAS THE BEST "REPLY" YOU GAVE ME SO FAR.
Your other replies are as "naive" as that of a toddler. There are lessons you got to learn in life... bitter as it may seem, but they are REAL.
"In the Philippines (as in other similar countries as well), it's not "WHAT" you know but "WHOM" you know"...
"In this world, there is no "RIGHT or WRONG"...just "SUPPORTED or NOT"...
"What is BAD for the herbivore is GOOD for the carnivore and vice versa"...
"Win the battle and lose the war"...
ETC...ETC...ETC...
Live longer and experience them yourself, IDEALIST.
Guys try to read nalang sa website na yan..mahaba haba din ang explanation nya about
'March 11,2010 Japan Disaster'
I challenge ANYONE to send me pictures of this quake showing me devastation in an area not hit by the tsunami.
http://en.ce.cn/subject/japanquake/photo/201103/12/t20110312_22292114_4.shtmlVideo image taken from NHK shows the road crack caused by the earthquake in Saitama, Japan, March 11, 2011
Nsa inyo na kung maniniwala kayo o hindi..