Symbianize Forum
Most of our features and services are available only to members, so we encourage you to login or register a new account. Registration is free, fast and simple. You only need to provide a valid email. Being a member you'll gain access to all member forums and features, post a message to ask question or provide answer, and share or find resources related to mobile phones, tablets, computers, game consoles, and multimedia.
All that and more, so what are you waiting for, click the register button and join us now! Ito ang website na ginawa ng pinoy para sa pinoy!
Atheists and Agnostics Meeting Place
- Thread starter Robotculator
- Start date
- Replies 12,090
- Views 437,131
- Status
- Messages
- 28
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 26
Ahehe as i expected. .Well nothing to say.It seems u already made up ur minds on which believe in. ,gusto ko lang malaman kung panu kayo magreact sa mga tanung nyan. .Good luck nlang saten. .
- Messages
- 623
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 26
neither i nor anyone else can present facts or proof that odin, vishnu, quetzocoatl, FSM or even unicorns do not exist. does that mean they are real?
nether i nor anyone else can present facts or proof that a claimed invisible teapot orbiting the star alpha centauri does not exist. does that mean its real?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russel's_teapot
billions actually. entire textbooks and books have been written on the evidence for the age of the earth and how the evidence was gathered
there are many evidences that earth is more than 6000 years old like radiometric dating, tree rings, living plants which are > 6000 yeats old, coral reefs so thick that their deposition would have to be in the meters per day if you only allow 6000 years, stalaictites in caves, sedimentary deposits which have yearly lines that number > 6000, etc etc etc
there are no fossils of humans intermingled with dino fossils. even mammal fossils wala except for the most primitive. claims of so called human footprints in dino age sediments are misinterpreted and fail under scrutiny
- Messages
- 623
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 26
1960's lang na uso ang radiometric dating, well after other method proved the old earth theory. and radiometric dating has been tested against other methods and found reasonably accurate.
4.5 billion years vs 6000 years is a huge discrepancy that will not be missed if radimetric dating is inaccurate
- Messages
- 1,123
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 26
so parang sinasabi mo na mas maniwala kami sa albularyo keysa doktor?
ang science ay may basehan dahil ito ay pinag aralan ng mabuti. katulad ng pagsasaliksik ng mga gamot na ginagamit sa mga ospital, o kaya ay mga piyesa na ginagamit sa computer at mga gadgets ngayon. lahat yan ay produkto ng siyensya.
eh ikaw, ano ba ang basehan o sa iyong paniniwala? basta ikinuwento ng sinaunang tao ay maniniwala ka na alng ba basta? mas mababaw na basehan naman yan.
so parang sinasabi mo na mas maniwala kami sa albularyo keysa doktor?
ang science ay may basehan dahil ito ay pinag aralan ng mabuti. katulad ng pagsasaliksik ng mga gamot na ginagamit sa mga ospital, o kaya ay mga piyesa na ginagamit sa computer at mga gadgets ngayon. lahat yan ay produkto ng siyensya.
eh ikaw, ano ba ang basehan o sa iyong paniniwala? basta ikinuwento ng sinaunang tao ay maniniwala ka na alng ba basta? mas mababaw na basehan naman yan.
sir ang labo ng iyong mata asan ang albularyo sa post ko? Hahaha, remember sir ang mga hayop ay walang malay sa science sila ay mababa ang IQ kasin baba mu, but they can survive wehehe, tao pa kaya sir ang di maka survive sir
alam muna kung sinong perfect wag kana mag maang maangan
sobrang babaw naman ng iny0ng paniniwala, sciensia ang inyong basehan, samantalang hndi naman perpekto ang science, madaming bagay ang d kaya ipaliwanag ng science sumamba n agad kayo
Mababaw ang science? Ha?
Wala ka dito sa symbianize kung walang science. HAHA
- Messages
- 551
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 26
Its best to ignore uintelligent questions and mumblings.
Please lang, baka ma-lock ulit tong thread at pati kayo madamay dyan.
Please lang, baka ma-lock ulit tong thread at pati kayo madamay dyan.
Sir its better to look at your self, i am ign0rat, why you dont study your self, gusto mu ba ianalize natin ang kahinaan mu? So that you find your self more ign0rant?
Last edited:
- Messages
- 1,107
- Reaction score
- 42
- Points
- 58
Para maging Atheist it doesn't need science... As the definition goes, atheism is the non-belief of god or gods... Klaro naman po...
Nagiging basis ang science, to answer the Theist questions in an intelligent manner...
hinde science ang foundation ng atheism....
Sana gets mo...
LASTLY, ignore unintelligent questions na nga lang baka madamay ang thead na to dahil lang nag-aalburuto ang ANAK NG dIYOS...
Para maging Atheist it doesn't need science... As the definition goes, atheism is the non-belief of god or gods... Klaro naman po...
Nagiging basis ang science, to answer the Theist questions in an intelligent manner...
hinde science ang foundation ng atheism....
Sana gets mo...
LASTLY, ignore unintelligent questions na nga lang baka madamay ang thead na to dahil lang nag-aalburuto ang ANAK NG dIYOS...
Sir isa karin ignorante, bakit dimu muna tingnan kung ika ay walang kahinaan, s bandang huli mas ign0rante kapa pala
- Messages
- 1,607
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 26
sobrang babaw naman ng iny0ng paniniwala, sciensia ang inyong basehan, samantalang hndi naman perpekto ang science, madaming bagay ang d kaya ipaliwanag ng science sumamba n agad kayo
ohh another ignorant being, blinded by faith... mind was corrupted by their leader who asked money for salvation
ignore mode for an unintelligent being
gandang umaga!
- Status