- Messages
- 645
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 26
akala ko pa naman seryoso na, nung makita ko ung voltes V... i was like DAFUQ? 
Symbianize Forum
Most of our features and services are available only to members, so we encourage you to login or register a new account. Registration is free, fast and simple. You only need to provide a valid email. Being a member you'll gain access to all member forums and features, post a message to ask question or provide answer, and share or find resources related to mobile phones, tablets, computers, game consoles, and multimedia.
All that and more, so what are you waiting for, click the register button and join us now! Ito ang website na ginawa ng pinoy para sa pinoy!
China vs Japan: Sino mananalo?
- Thread starter yarixen
- Start date
- Replies 221
- Views 12,351
- Messages
- 877
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 26
walang mananalo sa dalawa,,sa usapang bakbakan kapwa sila talo
bakit? dahil maraming mamatay na nilalang sa both bansa,,remember world war II masasabi bang may nanalo?
hindi eh,maraming buhay lang natigok lol
bakit? dahil maraming mamatay na nilalang sa both bansa,,remember world war II masasabi bang may nanalo?
hindi eh,maraming buhay lang natigok lol
- Messages
- 67
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 26
tingin ko CHINA,
theory ko lang naman, kasi above 50% ata ng ginagamit dito sa mundo ay "MADE IN CHINA"
kapag nawala na ung mga gamit "MADE IN CHINA" na yan sa bansang japan, hmmm.... kayo na dumagdag.... hehe
theory ko lang naman, kasi above 50% ata ng ginagamit dito sa mundo ay "MADE IN CHINA"
kapag nawala na ung mga gamit "MADE IN CHINA" na yan sa bansang japan, hmmm.... kayo na dumagdag.... hehe
- Messages
- 227
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 26
in today's modern weapons and wmd's?? Executing millennium old warfare principle aka "total annihilation warfare"?? the only winner i guess is death, destruction and global annihilation. two super countries declaring war on each other will only place the globe in total destruction.
In a war, all the resources of the state is dedicated for the sole purpose of arming its offensive force. and the ultimate and only purpose of war is the total annihilation and or subjugation of the nemesis country. there can be no other purpose than that, because engaging in war requires resources money and life. to engage in war your only goal is victory or else it will be a WASTE OF TIME AND RESOURCES.
Do the math. sinong magpapapigil between the two, at sinong makakapigil lalo na kung kanya kanyang kampihan na yan.
that was the main reason why cold war existed, between russia and us no one wants to pull the first blow, since both have the Nuclear capability. capability that is way destructive than the original bombs that exploded in Nagasaki and Hiroshima.
Imagine the History of the earth destroyed in a couple of seconds, billions of years gone for the vanity of man.
In a war, all the resources of the state is dedicated for the sole purpose of arming its offensive force. and the ultimate and only purpose of war is the total annihilation and or subjugation of the nemesis country. there can be no other purpose than that, because engaging in war requires resources money and life. to engage in war your only goal is victory or else it will be a WASTE OF TIME AND RESOURCES.
Do the math. sinong magpapapigil between the two, at sinong makakapigil lalo na kung kanya kanyang kampihan na yan.
that was the main reason why cold war existed, between russia and us no one wants to pull the first blow, since both have the Nuclear capability. capability that is way destructive than the original bombs that exploded in Nagasaki and Hiroshima.
Imagine the History of the earth destroyed in a couple of seconds, billions of years gone for the vanity of man.
Para naman sakin I can't conclude kung sino talaga ang mananalo sa kanila, Kung magkakaroon man ng war, wag naman sana ang may mas magandang strategy ang mananalo, wla din yan sa firepower. Advance nga ang technology, powerful weapons hindi naman nag-iisip wala din, talo din.
Tingen ko ang china at japan ay may mga tinatago pa yang mga weapon na hindi natin alam or hindi na isinasapublico, strategy nila na itago kung anong powerful weapon meron sila. Pagdating naman sa mga utang ng bansa, tingen ko hindi na nila maiisip yan sa gitna ng war pwede nila maisip bago sumabak sa giyera pero hindi na nila yan maiisip habang lumalaban sila.
At sana naman hindi maglaban itong dalawang bansa, dahil pag-nagkataon malamang gamitin tayo ng china para labanan ang japan.
Naiisip ko din na hindi makikialam ang Russia, baka tumulong pa to na pigilin ang gyera or pumagitna sa china at japan, hindi ko alam bakit ko nasabi to, wala akong basis, instinct lang.
Tingen ko ang china at japan ay may mga tinatago pa yang mga weapon na hindi natin alam or hindi na isinasapublico, strategy nila na itago kung anong powerful weapon meron sila. Pagdating naman sa mga utang ng bansa, tingen ko hindi na nila maiisip yan sa gitna ng war pwede nila maisip bago sumabak sa giyera pero hindi na nila yan maiisip habang lumalaban sila.
At sana naman hindi maglaban itong dalawang bansa, dahil pag-nagkataon malamang gamitin tayo ng china para labanan ang japan.
Naiisip ko din na hindi makikialam ang Russia, baka tumulong pa to na pigilin ang gyera or pumagitna sa china at japan, hindi ko alam bakit ko nasabi to, wala akong basis, instinct lang.
Last edited:
- Messages
- 227
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 26
then make a study to make your basis more solid. historical basis is that ruso-sino alliance have been existent even before the 2nd world war, russians was lost to japan in the nipon-ruso war, russia's communism may have fallen but its main ally china maintains its stand on socialism. US holds majority of its outsourcing investments on china, and has made loans to address their faltering economy. China has control on half of fuel embargo from middle east by virtue of their leverage on US who facilitates this, china is aggressively expanding and its requirements for resources are doubling each minute to not only maintain their industrialization but to enhance it further. China has a big population making resources still a big issue. If projections are right, given the nature of China's development they will soon be compared to the time US was at the peak of its industrialization. And to make US a Superpower that the world respects, it needs a war that it will win and be the hero. just as what US did in the last War.
If a war between the two countries ever exist, it would be a similar event that of World war 2. I believe their strategists are studying the events that transpired historically and the projections they can make and preparations and steps they have to take. Remember Socialism is not only a region based ideology but is projected as a global course of action. meaning socialism in more countries ensures that communism is at its doorsteps. I believe China is taking the lead role that russia has failed to do.
War is emminent, maybe not between china and japan, but of the present superpower being challenged by an emerging one. US with all its military might and strength, is now silently being challenged by China's aggressive increase in its armed forces to match US. Japan, by virtue of its loss during ww2 has been made to sign the treaty declaring they will never in any period in the future increase its armed forces that is disproportionate to its defense needs. Japan only has an armed force for the purposes of defense, the only country capable of offensive stance and invasive nature is the US. and that is what China is now trying to match.
If a war between the two countries ever exist, it would be a similar event that of World war 2. I believe their strategists are studying the events that transpired historically and the projections they can make and preparations and steps they have to take. Remember Socialism is not only a region based ideology but is projected as a global course of action. meaning socialism in more countries ensures that communism is at its doorsteps. I believe China is taking the lead role that russia has failed to do.
War is emminent, maybe not between china and japan, but of the present superpower being challenged by an emerging one. US with all its military might and strength, is now silently being challenged by China's aggressive increase in its armed forces to match US. Japan, by virtue of its loss during ww2 has been made to sign the treaty declaring they will never in any period in the future increase its armed forces that is disproportionate to its defense needs. Japan only has an armed force for the purposes of defense, the only country capable of offensive stance and invasive nature is the US. and that is what China is now trying to match.
- Messages
- 506
- Reaction score
- 10
- Points
- 28
voltes 5
haha. ayos ts,
japan talaga yan
haha. ayos ts,
japan talaga yan
- Messages
- 16
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 16
Hapon...Member ng Allied forces yan eh! Kakampi yan ng Pinas at Honorable yan mga yan marunong makisama hindi plastic kagaya ng mga tsekwang yan
wala pa kong nakitang tsekwa sa UFC mga walang bayag yan.
wala pa kong nakitang tsekwa sa UFC mga walang bayag yan.
- Messages
- 5
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 16
hindi kaya ng japan ng matagagalang giyera sa china
outnumbered sila at mauubusan sila ng resources
ang china pwede makipaglaban ng matagalan
outnumbered sila at mauubusan sila ng resources
ang china pwede makipaglaban ng matagalan
- Messages
- 15
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 16
JAPAN ako andyan din ang mga STRAWHAT PIRATES hahahahahaha!!!
- Messages
- 2,145
- Reaction score
- 5
- Points
- 28
Yes, Voltes V! Haha
But seriously, kahit outmuscled ang China currently sa war technologies ng Japan, it wouldn't take time for China to convert its industrial machinery into arms and war machinery. At alam ng China at Japan to—actually lahat ng world powers. The lesson is from the US: sa start ng World War II, walang ganun kalaking military machinery ang US. When WWII started, all it took for the US to be militarily competitive was transform its industrial might to military might with help from volunteer citizens, including women and kids. At alam din nila gaano na kalaki ang industrial base ng China that is propelling it to the top of world economy. Technologically speaking di rin pussycat ang China. In fact, it shows its resolve to be independent of all Western dependencies by coming up with its own homemade computer chips rivaling Intel, and it's now evident in it being the at the top of the heap of supercomputers and nation with largest number of entries in the top 100 supercomputers of the world, a scenario hard to imagine even ten years ago.
But seriously, kahit outmuscled ang China currently sa war technologies ng Japan, it wouldn't take time for China to convert its industrial machinery into arms and war machinery. At alam ng China at Japan to—actually lahat ng world powers. The lesson is from the US: sa start ng World War II, walang ganun kalaking military machinery ang US. When WWII started, all it took for the US to be militarily competitive was transform its industrial might to military might with help from volunteer citizens, including women and kids. At alam din nila gaano na kalaki ang industrial base ng China that is propelling it to the top of world economy. Technologically speaking di rin pussycat ang China. In fact, it shows its resolve to be independent of all Western dependencies by coming up with its own homemade computer chips rivaling Intel, and it's now evident in it being the at the top of the heap of supercomputers and nation with largest number of entries in the top 100 supercomputers of the world, a scenario hard to imagine even ten years ago.
