How the Roman Empire Created a Universal Religion

[Stormer0628]

continued from here

THE BEGINNING

---

---

​

---

---

Also, some of the characteristics used to create the Jesus character and some of the ’sayings’ that they used, were borrowed from Hillel the Pharisee. This was all too obvious to the Jews, and especially to the Rabbis of the day, who for the most part, were relatives (descendants) of Hillel (Beth Hillel). These same were also relatives (distant?) of the Pisos, for they also were descendants of King David.

Arrius Piso used ’Hercules’ to contribute the following attributes and characteristics to his Jesus character:

1. The ’Prince of Peace’ title
2. The virgin mother
3. a father who was a god
4. he too was ’the only begotten son’ of his ’god father’ (father, god)
5. Hercules too was called ’savior’
6. had the title ’the good shepherd’
7. Hercules also died and went for a brief visit to hell (Hades), after which he then ascended to Heaven (the heavens)

By 75 CE, Arrius Piso had revised the book ’Ur Marcus’ and we now know that book as the book ’Mark’ of the New Testament. Of course, with all of these things going on and with new conspirators on the rise, the conspirators didn’t want to attract any suspicion, but at the same time they needed a system in which they could not only keep track of their own material (propaganda), but also keep their identities secret yet still be able to claim authorship—for both prosperity and their own egos.

2:2 The Epistles of Paul the Apostle to Seneca (Anneas Seneca, d. 65 CE):

"For you know when, and by whom, at what seasons, and to whom I must deliver every thing which I send."​

(ref. Apocryphal New Testament)

The fact of the matter is that Seneca did not live long enough to see any other ’Christian’ books or paraphernalia except ’Ur Marcus’—the prototype for the book ’Mark.’ The Epistles of Paul the Apostle were written by Justus Calpernius Piso, and realizing this, it would also be realized that Seneca had long been departed. Justus didn’t start writing until the late 90’s CE, when he helped his dad and Pliny write ’Acts of the Apostles’.

Now that you have been briefed on the background of the conspiracy, here is a chronological synopsis:

Germanicus Caesar was the nephew and adopted son of the Roman Emperor Tiberius. Germanicus was born in 15 BCE, and died in 19 CE, when he was poisoned by Cnaeus Calpernius Piso, the Governor of Syria.

Cnaeus C. Piso was the father of Gaius, Marcus, and Lucius Calpernius Piso. Cnaeus died in 20 CE. Gaius Calpernius Piso was the father of Arrius Calpernius Piso, aka Flavius Josephus.

The Pisos were Romans and Arrius was also technically a Jew by descent because his mother was a Jew (or rather, a descendant of the Jewish hierarchy), his mother was Mariam (Arria the Younger) the Great-Granddaughter of King Herod the Great. Arrius C. Piso was born in the year 37 CE. The Younger Arria was the daughter of Arria the Elder who was the wife of Caecina Paetus. Caecina Paetus was involved in a conspiracy of Scribonianus’ against the Emperor Claudius in 42 CE, and was condemned to death.

Paetus’ wife, Arria, did not wish to survive him and took her life with him—by dagger. The Younger Arria found herself in the same situation in the year 65 CE with her husband Thrasea Paetus (Gaius Piso), but her husband begged her to live for the sake of their children. Philo of Alexandria died about 45 CE, and Philo mentioned Pilate in connection with the incident concerning the Roman shields, but he did not, nor could he make any mention of Jesus or the Christian story (the works of ’Philo’ are suspect also). If he was a real person other than Arrius Piso, he was a relative of Arrius Piso through the Herods of Judea.

’Philo’ mentioned ’Pilate’, not ’Pontius’ Pilate, because ’Pontius’ was added to the name later, as Pliny was helping Arrius write ’Luke’. Arrius Piso honored Pliny by adding the name ’Pontius’ as a variant of the name of the Province in which Pliny was in charge—Pontus. So that gave Pliny the nickname ’Pontius’.

In and around the year 55 CE, Rome started feeling the pressure of the new humanistic, anti-slavery, Pharisaic Jewish Party upon the aristocratic Roman lifestyle. During the years between 55 and 62, the Pisos’ popularity and family status had once again risen to a very high aristocratic level amongst those Patriotic Romans (and the Jewish hierarchy), who wanted to preserve that hallowed Roman institution of slavery. And along with Seneca, Galba, and a host of others, the Pisos were likened to heroes by a majority of influential and powerful Romans. In about the year 60, Lucius Calpernius Piso wrote ’Ur Marcus’—the prototype for the book ’Mark’ (which was later to be rewritten by Arrius Piso). During the following four years, Lucius, Seneca, Persius the Poet, and miscellaneous other conspirators tried to get Nero to assist them in their plan to give the people a new religion to help preserve the Roman institution of slavery and regain control of the masses through religion (by which they could then easily manipulate them through the use of rhetoric and spuriously synthesized ideologies).

to be continued...

 

[Stormer0628]

continued from above

THE BEGINNING

---

---

But these conspirators were thoroughly surprised to find that after giving Nero the details of their plan—he opposed it! Nero opposed the plan because his mistress at the time (who later became his wife), Poppea, was pro-Jewish Pharisaic Party. So, Gaius and Lucius Piso and their group planned to assassinate Nero in the year 65 CE. The attempt failed because Milichus told Nero about the plot in the hopes of receiving a large reward, but Nero was so shaken with sudden terror that he mistook Milichus’ greed for loyalty. Nero started questioning all of the conspirators that Milichus named; they in turn named even more.

Gaius Piso was put to death in his own home (remember, this is Thrasea Paetus, and he was at home with his wife Arria the Younger). He committed suicide as ordered, so that his family would not lose their holdings to the state. This order of suicide came from Nero to Gaius Piso just after Piso had been nominated senatorial successor that year. Seneca (Nero’s rhetoric teacher), and Seneca’s nephew Lucan, Barea Soranus, Faenius Rufus, and miscellaneous others were executed by Nero. Nero exiled Gaius’ son, Arrius, to Syria, where he stationed him as Governor (just as Arrius’ Grandfather Cnaeus Piso had been Governer of Syria also). Nero could not kill such a powerful figure as his relative Lucius Calpernius Piso Caesoninus, because he was the namesake of the earlier Roman Hero whose daughter married Julius Caesar. So, Lucius Piso, one of the main conspirators, escaped with his life. Nero allowed this only to prevent an uprising. Lucius Piso married his dead brother’s wife and adopted Arrius Piso. Nero still went about weeding out conspirators.

Nero executed Gaius Petronius Arbiter in 66, as a co-conspirator of Piso’s. And in that same year, Arrius Piso deliberately provoked a Jewish revolt—so he would have an excuse to destroy the Jewish Temple in Jerusalem. But Arrius wouldn’t be able to do that until the year 70, when he would have the help of Titus’ Army ( inner-circle source for the phrase ’you and what army’?). In 67, Nero ordered his probably loyal relative General Corbulo (also an Ahenobarbii like Nero through his father; in fact, Corbulo may have been Nero’s uncle) to commit suicide, as he also was suspected to be a co-conspirator of Piso. Arrius Piso finally succeeded in assassinating Nero by having Nero’s slave Epaphroditus do it for him (actually, this Epaphroditus was probably Arrius Piso himself. I will explain this further later). In 68 CE, Galba then became Emperor and named Arrius’ cousin, Licinianus Frugi Piso, as his intended successor.

On January 1st of the year 69 CE, Lower Germany declared Aulus Vitellius legate of that Province. Licinianus Piso was killed along with Galba in Rome during an uprising of soldiers put into action by Otho on January 15th. Licinianus Piso lived four days longer than Galba, and so was Emperor of Rome for those four days. Otho had taken Poppea, Nero’s widow, to be his wife and was Emperor after Piso. Then Otho was forced to kill himself after being defeated by Vitellius, who was then killed by an uprising of soldiers—staged by Arrius Piso in order to secure Vespasian’s position as new Emperor. All of this was in the year 69 CE. Why would Arrius Piso want Vespasian to be the new Emperor? Arrius Calpernius Piso was the grandson of Vespasian’s own brother!

Because T. Flavius Sabinus 2 (Vespasian’s brother, where Arrius gets the ’Flavius’ in his ’Flavius Josephus’ name), was married to the elder Arria, Arrius Piso’s grandmother! So, the Emperor Vespasian was Arrius Piso’s grand-uncle! The year 70 C.E. saw the destruction of the Temple in Jerusalem, where thousands of Jews were killed by Titus’ and Piso’s army. And about that year (or more probably year 71), Lucius Piso wrote his second book, the logia ’Ur Matthias’. In the year 71, Titus issued his infamous ’Captive Judea’ coin. And in the year 73, as a Roman General, Arrius Piso and his army destroyed the last three Jewish outposts—Machaerus, Herodian, and Mesada. It was in this year that Lucius Piso was killed, supposedly ’accidentally’ by Arrius Piso himself.

Arrius Piso then starts rewriting his uncles’ books. Arrius Piso has the original copies translated from his uncles’ Latin versions into Greek, and even though Arrius had altered them slightly, they still contain a strong hint of Latin influence. So, about the year 75, the new versions of ’Mark’ and ’Matthew’ appear. AD 79 was the year of the eruption of Mt. Vesuvius at the Bay of Naples, which buried the cities of Pompeii and Herculaneum. Pliny the Younger and his uncle (the Elder Pliny), saw the eruption and tried to save some of their family members (and books) who were caretakers of Lucius Piso’s library at Herculaneum. The Elder Pliny lost his life there at the Bay of Naples, but even though they managed to take some books, they left about 800 of them behind (which is an estimate made by the most studious D. Comporetti).

to be continued....

 

[Stormer0628]

continued from above...

THE BEGINNING

---

---

---

---

​

Excavations show that there was a number of Epicurean Philosophic papyrus in both Greek and Latin, but the vast majority of the papyri was written in Latin (which was Lucius Piso’s main language). Some of the Greek papyrus was originally from the library of their ancestor and Epicurean philosopher—Philodemus of Gadara. In the year 80, a severe fire was supposed to have occurred in Rome.

And in the year 84, Pliny the Younger officially became member of the immediate Piso family by his marriage to Arrius Piso’s granddaughter Calpurnia (this, according to my earlier notes. However, Pliny was already related, at least semi-distantly). During the year 85, both Arrius and Pliny the Younger together wrote the New Testament book Luke. And in the year 90, Arrius started writing the Jewish Antiquities under his pen name Flavius Josephus.

Arrius Piso’s sister, Fannia, who was infamous for the number of times in which she had been banished, came back to Rome with her mother—Arria the younger (the widow of Thrasea Paetus aka Gaius Piso). Fannia was banished again in 93—under Domitian—and her property was confiscated. Also, in 93, Suetonius came to live with his grandfather—Arrius Piso! When Suetonius’ father Rufus died in 93, Arrius brought Suetonius (in history under the names Arrius Verus and Titus Antonius) into his home. Suetonius was the son of Arrius Piso’s daughter Claudia Phoebe Pompeia Plotina Calpurnia Pisa (Piso).

In the year 95, Alexander, Arrius Piso’s first son (who was the father of Pliny’s wife Calpurnia) died. Also in that year, Flavius Clemens, a first cousin of Emperor Domitian, was executed on a charge of atheism. Many have wondered just what was meant by this. Remember who ’God’ was? Caesar! So, to say that there was no God was to denounce Caesar—who just happened to be Domitian at the time. Then in 96, Piso (Arrius) and Pliny assassinated Domitian, who was the second son and last main survivor of Vespasian. The Dynamic Duo (Arrius and Pliny) were assisted in the assassination by Stephanus (Remember the martyr of Stephan, 1st Cor. 1:16), who was the slave of the Emperor’s niece Domitilla. Then they appointed the Elderly Nerva Emperor, because he would allow the Pisos to do anything that they liked. He ruled for two years and died of natural causes.

Also, in 96, Piso started writing his Vita while helping his son, Fabius Justus (Justin Martyr) Calpernius Piso and Pliny the Younger write Acts of the Apostles (which they finished about the year 100). In 98, when Nerva died, Trajan became Emperor. Trajan was Arrius Piso’s son-in-law. He was married to Claudia Phoebe Pompeia Plotina Pisa. Martial, their relative, wrote about their marriage. Because Piso’s daughter was Empress, she was allowed to write an actual portion of the New Testament, because remember, the New Testament was THE BOOK OF LIFE itself!

She wrote the last part of Romans. That was the year 100, when her brother Proculus was writing Romans. Pliny started writing 1st Corinthians, Galatians, and Ephesians, finishing those books in the year 103. Also in the year 100, Pliny was starting up the first churches in Pontus and Bithynia. Now the Piso family really kicks into high gear! Between the years 100-105, Pliny writes Titus and starts writing epistles as St. Ignatius (he wrote epistles to the churches that he started up!). Can you picture this? Such was how Christianity was started. And Julius Piso wrote an epistle as Clement of Rome, Proculus as St. Polycarp. In the year 105, Justus writes the Gospel of John.

Justus wrote Timothy 2 in 107 CE, while helping his son Julianus and his nephew Silanus to write Thessalonians 1 & 2, which they finished writing around 110 CE. During that time, Justus and Julianus also wrote Philemon, and Justus finished up James by himself in 110. Between the years 110 and 115, Proculus Piso and Julius Piso were the family writers. Proculus was writing Peter 1 & 2, and Julius was writing John 1, 2 and 3, and Jude. By the end of 115, all the books of the New Testament were written except Revelations and Hebrews.

Pliny the Younger, playing the part of Paul in Titus 1:12, quotes Epimenides the Cretan, saying, "All Cretans are liars." That is, a Cretan (Greek) saying that all Cretans are liars. Why would Pliny say this in the first place? Because he was teasing at the fact that the Pisos were liars descended from the Greeks, and in fact, directly descended from the brother of Alexander the Great (his brother’s name was Lagos, which means The Rabbit). [WTF, were they having this much fun??]

Note: There is a noted similarity found in the Lord’s Prayer (written by Arrius Piso), and Philo of Alexandria (Reportedly, the chief Rabbi of Alexandria, Egypt):

"If you ask pardon for ’your’ sins ("sins"??) do you also forgive those who have trespassed against ’you’? For, (in this), remission is granted for remission."
​

The ’remission of sins’ sounds familiar. So does ’forgive those who have trespassed.’ Sounds a lot like that old devil himself, Arrius Piso! Also, Philo of Alexandria was supposed to have died around the year 45 CE; the Jews didn’t start calling teachers ’Rabbi’ until after the year 70!

 

[melvipedia]

Isa ito sa mga uri ng Jesus mythicism na nagsimula ang unang anyo kay Bruno Bauer sa Christ and the Caesars noong 1877. Napakatagal na nito, may Pisonian Conspiracy Theory at ang latest na version ay iyong kay Joseph Atwill. Interesting subalit napakaraming problema ng teorya nila. I also consider the Jesus mythicism as long as the evidence are sound tulad na lang ng thesis ni Richard Carrier sa On the Historicity of Jesus: Why We Might Have Reason for Doubt.

 

[Stormer0628]

Isa ito sa mga uri ng Jesus mythicism na nagsimula ang unang anyo kay Bruno Bauer sa Christ and the Caesars noong 1877. Napakatagal na nito, may Pisonian Conspiracy Theory at ang latest na version ay iyong kay Joseph Atwill. Interesting subalit napakaraming problema ng teorya nila. I also consider the Jesus mythicism as long as the evidence are sound tulad na lang ng thesis ni Richard Carrier sa On the Historicity of Jesus: Why We Might Have Reason for Doubt.

I have carefully considered the arguments for and against this Christian origin view, as I indicated at the start of the thread if you will notice. There are strong arguments for and against it, hence my decision to let the readers decide for themselves. What is interesting is that there never has been an official position from the Roman Catholic Church about this, much the same way that the Vatican has not properly addressed the work of Dupuis from around the same time, I think. I reckon all this silence from the official Roman Church hierarchy, along with the vicious anti-establishment attacks of the Enlightenment movement and Voltaire's group, had a lot to do with the weakening of religion in Europe overall, which continues even now. These materials are the kind of information that has traditionally not gone beyond the borders of Europe. It is high time it happens in the Internet age.

 

[Stormer0628]

continued from HERE

THE SON COMETH: IN THE MOOD FOR HUMOR

---

---

​

---

---

Matt. 4:3:

"If thou art (the) son of God, speak, that these stones may turn to loaves (of bread)."
​

He then smartly answers his own remark in Matt. 4:4, saying:

"Man does not live by bread alone."​

Later, in Matt. 7:9, he says:

"Or what man is there of you who, if his son should ask (for) bread, will give him a stone?"​

This is said again in Luke 4:3. And in 1st Peter 2:4:

"To whom coming, (as) a living stone, is indeed rejected by men."
​

WHO WAS WHO?​

Because of the work done by Guy Edward Farguhar Chilver on the works of Tacitus, we find that Gaius Piso was in fact, a different person other than Lucius Piso—they were brothers.

Lucius Piso was the friend who Seneca corresponded with by using the name "Lucilius" (Seneca’s Epistoles Morales). These two were a team, much like Arrius Piso and Pliny the younger would become later. In fact, the writers themselves joke about that fact. One of Arrius Piso’s other names is "Atrius.| Pliny notifies Arrius of the receipt of his book—like Seneca’s letter to Lucilius (Lucius Piso), Arrius Piso’s uncle and adoptive father!

Reference for this is Pliny II, Book IX, No. XXXV and Seneca IV, Epistulae Morales I, Book XLVI. This Lucius Piso carried the same name as the father of the Calpurnia who married Julius Caesar—Lucius Calpernius Piso Cesoninus. He had a villa at Herculaneum in the Bay of Naples. His brother was married to Arria the Younger, and together they had an only begotten son—Arrius Calpernius Piso! When Gaius Piso was killed by Nero in 65 CE, Lucius Piso married the widow of his brother and adopted her son (his nephew) Arrius.

Lucius Piso had a daughter with his brother’s widow. This daughter was the "Fannia" of history. The writers of the time try to throw you off by making you think that they are talking about Fannia as being the only child of Thrasea Paetus (Gaius Piso) and Arria the Younger—but it was Arrius who was born first, in 37 CE! Lucius Piso died in 73 CE, but his villa was maintained by relatives until it was buried by ash when Mt. Vesuvius erupted in 79 CE. Something that a person studying history ought to ask themselves is why would Arria the Younger name her daughter "Fannia"? Simple: "Fannia" is another form of "Arria," with the R’s as N’s , and with the addition of the letter F for "Flavius" (the feminine form is "Flavia"—i.e., "Flavia Arria"). This same device of switching letters to hide identities was also used in the Annii Verii, which was made up by Arrius Piso writing as Josephus, when he calls himself "Arrius Verus" (he drops the I from what he really calls himself—Arrius Various, or the "Various Arrius").

When Arrius Piso’s daughter Claudia Phoebe Pompeia Plotina married the Emperor Trajan, the family allowed her to write herself into The Book of Life. She wrote Romans 16:25-27 (which is the very reason why this portion of Romans is not included in some English versions. Some of the family would not have a woman write any portion of the accepted text. But she did, and that portion still exists today). That was around the year 100 CE, when her brother Proculus wrote the bulk of Romans. Claudia Phoebe would live on past the death of her husband and help appoint Hadrian as the new Emperor.

THE WRITERS AND WHAT THEY DID
​

ARRIUS PISO:
Wrote as "Josephus," and the Greek "Apion" (because remember, he is descended from Alexander the Great’s father, Philip of Macedonia. It is he [Arrius] who Pliny the Younger jokes about in Titus 1:12, when he says, "All Cretans are liars"). Arrius invented and mentions Jesus, John the Baptist, and James the brother of Jesus.

CORNELIUS FUSCUS:
Wrote as "Tacitus," mentions Christ and Christians.

TRAJAN:
Wrote as "Plutarch," hints at parallelism, mentions hints to codes, and mentions family members only. However, Trajan probably also wrote as "Dio Chrysostum" and was the nephew of the Emperor Otho. Trajan’s son, "Flavius Arrianus," hints at his father being Plutarch in some papers that he wrote while in Egypt.

TITUS ANTONINUS:
Wrote as "Suetonius," mentions "Chrestus." He was the Emperor Antoninus Pius. He also wrote as Church Father Tatian. He was the son of Claudia Phoebe by Rufus Musonius.

FLAVIUS ARRIANUS:
Wrote as "Ptolemy," "Appian," "Arrian." He wrote The Shepherd of Hermas, Hebrews, the apocryphal Barnabas, The Didache, The Martyrdom of Polycarp, the Epistle to Diognetus, and other "letters" that look like sales documents which he had written while he was in Egypt—and that is where these were found. These other documents by Arrianus are included in a collection of works that are available from the Loeb Classical Library under the title "Select Papyri."

JUSTUS CALPERNIUS PISO:
aka "Fabius Justus," he wrote as Church Father "Justin Martyr." He was Arrius Piso’s son, and it was Justus Piso who wrote the anachronistic Gospel of John.

JULIANUS PISO:
Was the son of Justus Piso. He wrote as Church Father "Papius," and was the father of the Emperor Marcus Aurelius.

PLINY THE YOUNGER:
Had other names, too, but we’ll get into that later. As "Pliny," he mentions Christians to establish them historically and arouse an interest in them. He was Church Father "St. Ignatius," and started up the first churches in his province of Pontus ("Pontius") and Bithynia.

JULIUS PISO:
Wrote Revelations, and the epistles of John and Jude. He was Church Father "Clement of Rome." The family took him to Rome to execute him, because of his insistence that his grandson be named the successor of Hadrian. His name in history is Julius Servianus Severus.

 

[Stormer0628]

A BRIEF TIME-LINE: GUIDE TO HOW PEOPLE & EVENTS ARE MANIPULATED IN THE BIBLE

---

---

---

---

TIMELINE: BRIEF GUIDE TO KEY PEOPLE AND EVENTS

• 115 CE - Julius (Severus) Piso writes 1st, 2nd, and 3rd John and Jude. The Second Jewish revolt starts, and 1 million Jews take over Alexandria Egypt for 1 year.
• 116 CE - Pliny the Younger dies in battle with the Jews (under the name Maximus—he was Pontifex Maximus, remember).
• 117 CE - Trajan dies, his son Flavius Arrianus finishes the books that he was writing as Plutarch. Hadrian becomes the new Emperor after Trajan.
• 120 CE - Tacitus “Cornelius Fuscus” dies. By the way, Julius Piso’s grandson “Pedanius Fuscus” was also Tacitus’ grandson. Julius Piso’s daughter Julia married Tacitus’ son “Fuscus” to produce the child that they hoped would succeed the Emperor.
• 121 CE - Hadrian is in Gaul. Marcus Aurelius is born.
• 124 CE - Claudia Phoebe Pompeia Plotina Piso (Pius) dies.
• 128 CE - Hadrian is in North Africa.
• 129 CE - Hadrian in Athens (Greece).
• 130 CE - Hadrian in Alexandria Egypt.
• 132 CE - The third Jewish revolt. Hadrian is back at Rome. War rages for the next three years.
• 134 CE - Hadrian takes personal charge of the campaign in palestine.
• 135 CE - Hadrian recovers Jerusalem. Julius Severus Piso was summoned by Hadrian from Britain to help in the war with the Jews. As a Roman General, Julius—with his troops totaling 35,000 men—were met at first with defeat—to their total suprise. But, in the end, Julius and his troops caused the Diaspora (the dispersion of the Jews, which lasted from 135 CE till the year 1919). Bar Cochba was killed at Betar, and Rabbi ben Akiba was tortured to death.
• 136 CE - In exchange for his help in the war, Julius asks Hadrian to name his grandson as his successor. Hadrian says no.
• 137 CE - Julius is angry at the family and writes Revelations bitingly. This was the power that Julius was bequeathed by his father to counter the power that was left to his brother (whsose grandson would succeed Antoninus Pius).
• 138 CE - Hadrian orders Julius to commit suicide in Rome and executes Julius’ grandson Pedanius Fuscus. Later, Hadrian dies and Suetonius (Titus Antonius Antoninus Pius ’Piso’) becomes Emperor.
• 139 CE - Flavius Arrianus (aka “Arrian,” “Appian,” and “Ptolemy”) writes the apocryphal General Epistle of Barnabas.
• 140 CE - Flavius Arrianus writes the New Testament book Hebrews.
• 145 CE - Flavius Arrianus writes the Shepherd of Hermas (a title that reeks of Roman influence). Also in this year, Marcus Aurelius marries Faustina.
• 161 CE - Antoninus Pius (Suetonius) dies, and Marcus Aurelius becomes Emperor.
• 170 CE - Rabbi Judah writes “Zechariah” and “Haggai.”
• 175 CE - Rabbi Judah (the Prince). Both a friend and relative of Marcus Aurelius (and descendant of Hillel the Pharisee), writes the Hebrew version of Job (the first version having been written by Arrius Piso, in honor of himself, his father, and his “House,” that being the “House” of the supreme god—“Jove” or “Jupiter.” That’s also why when the family captured Jerusalem, they renamed it “Jupiter Capitolinus” as the “New Jerusalem.”
• 180 CE - Death of Marcus Aurelius. His son “Commodus” becomes Emperor.
• 183 CE - Plot to kill Commodus uncovered.
• 192 CE - Commodus assassinated. Pertinax becomes Emperor.
• 193 CE - Pertinax murdered. Didius Julianus is made Emperor.

THE PROCESSION OF THE BISHOPS
When do we hear that St. Peter was Bishop? In 42 CE? No! In the first century? No!

Once you have become proficient at history and have the span of “history” from before BCE to Fourth century down pat, then you will have quite an overview of what actually transpired. The further away from the first century CE you get, the more you see “historians” and Church Fathers trying to predate people and events which they have created later on to help establish the legitamacy of Christianity. This can best be seen in the Church’s procession of Bishops. They date St. Peter to the year 42 as the first Bishop of Rome. He is a fictional character.

Next, Irenaeus, Eusebius, and “St. Jerome” say that “Linus” was Bishop of Rome after St. Peter in 67. Tertullian and Rufinus say that “Clement” was Bishop in 68. Now, this was said for a purpose. Julius Piso (Arrius Piso’s son), wrote as St. Clement of Rome in about 110 CE, the Second Century! By saying that “Clement” was Bishop of Rome in 68, they also predated Justus’ writings. Not only was that done for the obvious reason, but also for another. You would think that to posthumously honor Julius by making his character “Clement” Bishop of Rome would be another reason, but in fact Julius died in opposition to the family. So, to make his character “Bishop of Rome” was to ridicule his memory! This is the snide way that “the family” dealt with those who didn’t go along with them.


THE NEW ACHILLES
Both the family (the Pisos) and the Jews joked by calling Arrius Piso “Swift of Foot” knowing that he was also “Nicon” (Victor). He is called “Nicolas” from “Nicon,” “Nicolas” being Greek for Balaam. That’s why the Jews made the legend of the Lamed Vov, it’s just “Balaam” rearranged in Hebrew. And he was also the New Achilles, because his Jesus story made him strong—but he too had an Achilles’ heel. Arrius and his family had joked and bragged so much about what they were doing that eventually they would be found out—and they both expected and anticipated it.

Why was Jesus the “Bright Morning Star”? This was another hint. Because Arrius Piso had become the new Achilles and Achilles’ spear was the “Bright Evening Star,” Arrius’ spear (Jesus) was made the “Bright Morning Star”!!! For more on this, read Homer’s Iliad.

They took their enemies’ names and attributes and used them to jokingly reinforce their Jesus story. They took the teachings of Hillel the Pharisee (the main teacher of the new humanistic Pharisaic School), and changed them to fit their new Roman religion. Just check the Jewish Pirkei Aboth. Also, they did a real job on their enemies in the Jewish-Humanistic Camp during their war with the Jews. Especially on one Rabbi Yohanan ben Zakai.


THE RIDICULE OF RABBI YOHANAN BEN ZAKAI
The Piso family ridiculed this famous Jewish leader, who was the youngest student of Hillel the Pharisee, for he was a leader in the war against the Romans who wrote the New Testament! “Zakai” spelled or translated into Greek is “Zacchaeus.” We find this spelling of the name in Luke Chapter 19, verses 5 and 8. Also, the same spelling is in the apocryphal book The Infancy of Jesus Christ, which is attributed to “Saint Thomas.” The writers of the New Testament make a further joke of ridiculing the Rabbi by saying that John the Baptist was the son of Zacharias, because translated, Yohanan ben Zakai is John the Righteous. But even more, they incorporated “Zachi” (Zakai) with ’’Arias” (Arrius)! “ben” is “son of,” so, its—“John, son of Zakai/Arrius”!!!

Not only is it a joke, but the truth, too! I’ve just explained the joke. The truth was that John the Baptist was the (fictional) “son” or invention of Arrius Piso. Another cruel thing about this joke is that in the story, John the Baptist came to pave the way for Christianity by making Rabbi Zakai John the Baptist in the story—they made him (who opposed the Pisos) to help pave the way for Christianity.
Then, Arrius, writing as Josephus (in order to rewrite history), inserts the name “Zacharias” (that he made up) into “history.” For Arrius Piso, such was the power of the all-conquering Rome.


RHETORICAL DEVICES
The Pisos and their relatives were taught rhetoric from childhood. And they had every book on anything available to them—there was nothing that was ever thought upon and written down that wasn’t at their convenience. So, is it any wonder that we find Arrius Piso writing as Josephus? And even writing as Josephus’ enemy and critic Apion! For, as Apion, he can say things to ridicule the Jews that the character Josephus wouldn’t dare.

Later, Flavius Arrianus wrote as Ptolemy, and he also wrote as his character’s teacher—Epictetus! This was to further confuse people so that they would not see the consistency of the plot. For Epictetus is a made-up name with no other historical confirmation, whereas other real people, even by their playing their characters by using other names, are confirmable. By the way, the name that Flavius Arrianus chose to be his teacher was a joke and consistent with their rule of hiding names and meanings by switching certain letters. “Epictetus” is “Epistolus,” because the letters S and C were interchangeable, as were the letters T and L, this by their numerical value of 3 in Piso’s Greek small number system. His “teacher” was “Epistolus” (he who writes epistles), and the name “Epistolus,” like the word “epistle” in Greek, contains the name “Piso.”

 

[Stormer0628]

---

---

HOW THE DEVIL GOT HIS LOOKS
There was no Devil before Piso made him as the enemy of Jesus. The Hebrew books did originally mention “Satan,” but the word meant the bad nature or disposition that a person may have at times—not a Devil as the NT describes. And of course, the concept of Hell was borrowed from the fictional place that the Greeks called “Hades.”

1. He’s red. They were joking about the family name of Ahenobarbus which by Suetonius’ reference denotes the color red because of the ruddy color of the Ahenobarborus men’s beards. Ahenobarbus was the name of the family line through which Nero’s father came from. “Red” is also a family nickname, which was changed around by switching interchangeable letters. Those names include Kokkes, Sosses, Cocces.
2. Horns on his head. Since the Devil is Piso himself, and Piso is the Beast (ippos) in Revelations, his son Julius gives the beast 10 horns (which are meant to allude to another family name coming from Cleopatra Selene’s father, Aulus, meaning pipe, flute, or horn). This, in Revelations 13:1.
3. Pitchfork. In Acts of the Apostles, Arrius Piso makes his pitches with his forked tongue for his new religion, saying, "Come one, come all, see the great creation—Jesus."
4. He’s got a pointed tail (tale). Of course the Devil (Piso) has a pointed tale—the Jesus story! It’s pointed because he makes jokes, puns, and ridicules his enemies in it!
5. Cloven feet. Clovis, which is a form of the family name Clodius (Claudius). We also get the association between St. Patty Calpernius, the Sham-rock (Shammi, Petros—“rock”), and the four-leafed clover. This comes later, when St. Augustine (and his brother?) St. Patrick go to Ireland to drive out the Druids (snakes), and establish Christianity there.
6. Forked tongue. Of course, the Devil (Piso) speaks with a forked tongue (and he is double-minded as the NT says) because he lies. The American Indians never said, "White man speak with forked tongue," except in movies. Because an inner-circle member made that up as a joke. “White man” is Albinus, a Piso family name. Also, they made the association with the snake having a forked tongue, alluding back to the snake lying to Eve. The reference to forked tongue can be found in the New Testament itself, in Acts 2:3.

LUCIFER AND THE DEVIL
Later in Christology, the name Lucifer became synonymous with the Christian Satan or The Devil (Piso’s Devil—himself!), because like Lucius (of light), Lucifer means “Shining One.”

This Shining One is of “pomp and glory”—that is, vain. Check the name Lucifer in Isaiah 14:12 (use an Analytical Concordance). In the war with the Jews, even those who were newly converted from paganism were used to fight the Jews. That’s why we find in those certain New Testament books anti-Semetic passages and can better understand the prevailing mood of the time described when those books were written. Should it strike anyone as funny that this new anti-Semitic religion called Christianity and it books should come at a time when Rome was at war with the Jews?

In giving the family lineage, Plutarch (Trajan) affirms Arrius’ descent from the person whom the Hercules character had been modeled after, thereby exposing Arrius’ license by relation to use the attributes of Hercules (including titles) in the synthesis of the Jesus character. Plutarch was Arrius Piso’s son-in-law, the Roman Emperor Trajan! In Plutarch’s Alexander (Alexander the Great), Trajan says that Alexander the Great was descended from Hercules. And of course, we find that Arrius Piso was descended from Alexander the Great’s brother Lagos. Who was the real-life person who was Arrius Piso’s ancestor and the person from whom the Hercules character was modeled after? Perhaps this person was Heraclitus of Ephesus circa 500 BCE. He was a Greek philosopher who studied epistemology. The very name Hercules means “Glorius gift of Hera” (Glorious gift of Hera-clitus?). His compounded name is said to prove that he (Hercules) was a real man (person).


MORE ABOUT ARRIUS PISO AND JESUS
Why does the traditional Jesus have a beard? Nowhere in the New Testament does it say that Jesus had a beard! The word “beard” is not to be found in it! So, where did his beard come from? It will be pointed out that holy men in those days did not cut their hair. The source for that information? Josephus. According to the New Testament, Jesus did not have a beard. However, the person who played Jesus did! Arrius Piso, as Josephus, had a beard. That’s why the traditional Jesus has a beard. Because for whatever was lacking in their fictional character, all they had to do was go to the real-life personage behind the character to draw those extra characteristics needed to make their character seem larger than life.


WILL THE REAL CHRISTIAN GOD PLEASE STAND UP!
So, who is this mysterious Christian God? CAESAR! He (Jesus/Josephus/Arrius Piso) was “the likeness of God” (2[SUP]nd[/SUP] Cor. 4), because he was related to the deified Caesars! Great Caesar’s holy ghost! Can it be that even today, we live in a nation under Caesar?

The deified Caesars include:

• Julius Caesar
• Augustus Caesar
• Claudius Caesar
• Vespasian
• Titus

It would seem most possible that Cneius Calpernius Piso was the son of Julius Caesar and Calpurnia Piso, thereby drawing a direct line to Arrius Piso:

JULIUS CAESAR
M. CALPURNIA PISO (LUCIA PISA) CAESONINAE
|
MARCUS GNAEUS (CNEIUS) CALPERNIUS PISO
M. PLANCINA MUNATIA
|
GAIUS CALPERNIUS PISO CAESONINAE
M. MARIAMNE (“MARY,” ARRIA THE YOUNGER)
|
ARRIUS (JOSEPHUS) CALPERNIUS PISO
M. BOIONIA SERVILA PRISCILLA​

Julius Caesar was also related to Marc Anthony. The phrase “son of the living god” is also a hint (check Suetonius’ description of Caligula). In Matt. 16:16, Simon Peter says, "Thou art the Christ, the son of the living god." A key word here is “son.” The word they use has a double meaning: it can mean son like a person’s son, or it can mean descendant. The Caesars were the new Roman gods replacing the old ones. So, when Jesus (Arrius Piso) says that he’s the son of God, he’s really saying that he is a descendant of Caesar!!

In Mark 14:58, Arrius Piso jokes about his finally destroying the Jewish Temple. Arrius Piso as Jesus says:
"I will destroy this Temple, the one made with hands, and in three (trion) days, another not made with hands I will build."
He says in the “trion” days, meaning in the days of the trinity. Not built with hands, but with mind. That is, rhetorical—using words to be the new temple, one that would stand even when the very buildings would crumble. That is why they say that the building is not the church, but it is the congregation which is the church and body of Christ (Piso), and cannot be destroyed as a building.

Julius Piso, Arrius Piso’s son, counters the rhetoric by placing hints and clues in Revelations: Julius makes his father into a dragon in Rev. 12:3. Why a dragon? Because the same word for dragon also means “a baby boy,” and that’s the baby Jesus!!

 

[Stormer0628]

---

---

THE RIDICULE OF THE RABBIS OF THE DAY BY THE ROMANS

Based on the foregoing, it’s safe to say the ‘First Infancy’ was written at the time of Acts and Luke, which was around the year 90 CE. In the Apocryphal ‘Infancy,’ we find that they have inserted Rabbi ben Dosa (a student of Zakai) as ‘the son of Hanani a Jew.’ The full name of this Rabbi was ‘Hanina’ ben Dosa (Ref. Chap. XIX, 18 and 20).

They insert Rabbi Gamaliel, the Jewish leader who was the President of the Pharisaic Party and descendant of Hillel. They changed his name around and put him in Acts 22:3, 5:38–39. They have Rabbi Akiba in Acts 11:28, 21.10.

And they have the Jewish commander Eliezer ben Yair who died fighting the Pisos in 73 CE as ‘Jairus’ (Roman form of Yair), in Mark 5:22.

They interchanged letters to hide the true identity of the Rabbis that they were ridiculing. For Akiva, spelled either ‘Akiva’ or ‘Akiba,’ they followed their principle of interchanging the letters S, C, and K so that they have ‘Aciba’; then they change it even further following another ‘Roman’ principle of switching C’s and G’s, as in the name ‘Caius’ and ‘Gaius’ (like ‘Caius’ or ‘Gaius’ Caligula).

In Acts 19:14, they make Akiva just plain ‘Kiva,’ spelling it ‘Ceva’ with an S in front of it, rendering the name ‘Sceva,’ which is short for the Greek word ‘Scevazon,’ meaning ‘I create.’

This portion of Acts of the Apostles was written by Justus Piso.


THE AUTHORS OF THE NEW TESTAMENT BOOKS
NAMES OF THE BOOKS || DATES || ACTUAL AUTHORS

• The original Mark || 60 CE || Lucius Calpurnius Piso
  [*]Matthew || 70–75 || Arius Calpurnius Piso
  [*]The present Mark || 75–80 || Arius Calpurnius Piso
  [*]Luke || 85–90 || Arius C. Piso and Pliny
  [*]John || 105 || Justus Calpurnius Piso
  [*]Acts of the Apostles || 96–100 || Justus and Pliny
  [*]Romans || 100 || Proculus C. Piso and Claudia
  [*]I Corinthians, Galatians || 100–103 || Pliny the Younger and Ephesians
  [*]II Corinthians, Philippians || 103–105 || Justus C. Piso
  [*]Colossians || 106–107 || Justus and his son Julianus
  [*]I Timothy || 105 || Pliny
  [*]II Timothy || 107 || Justus C. Piso
  [*]I and II Thessalonians || 105–110 || Justus and his son Julianus, and some by Justus’ nephew Silanus
  [*]Titus || 103–105 || Pliny
  [*]Philemon || 105–110 || Justus and Julianus Piso
  [*]James || 110 || Justus C. Piso
  [*]I and II Peter || 110–115 || Proculus Piso
  [*]I, II, and III John || 110–115 || Julius C. Piso
• Jude || 110–115 || Julius C. Piso
• Revelation || 137 || Julius C. Piso
• Hebrews || 140 || Flavius Arrianus (son of Claudia Phoebe)

THE PISO FAMILY IN THE NEW TESTAMENT

The Pisos felt that they had a 'right' to make a new religion based on Judaism because they were descendants of the Herodian/Hasmonean hierarcy that appointed the Jewish High Priests.

Arrius Piso was called 'Mountanus' in History. His name was Arrius, which is 'Mars.’ In Acts 17:22, they insert Arrius' name by mentioning 'Mars' Hill.’ That is 'Arrius Pagos’; by making Arrius synonymous with 'hill,' they make him a small mountain. If you stood at the bottom of Mars' hill, you could call it a mountain. But then others may argue that you were "making a mountain out of a mole-hill"—although that's exactly what the writers of the New Testament did. The above phrase was an inner-circle reference, because the Hebrew word for 'mole' also meant 'chamelion,’ which Arrius Piso certainly was, as he blended himself into the background of 'history.’

As said before, the 'history' books of the time were not so much 'history' books as they were family ledgers. So was the New Testament! They gave honor to their ancestors and themselves by writing them into the 'Book of Life'—that is, the New Testament. Also, by giving honorable mention to their relatives, they were giving (inserting) another way in which to claim authorship. It was one of the many ways that they used to 'copyright' their work. Of course, since the Herods were Arrius Piso's relatives, he wrote them into his story. Herod the Great (King Herod) was his (Arrius Piso's) great-great grandfather. Archelaus was his great-uncle, as were Antipas, Philip, and Herod the Tetrarch. Herodias (wife of Philip), was his great-aunt. Agrippa 1 was his grand uncle, as was Tiberius Julius Alexander (brother of Tigranes). Aristobulus was his great-grandfather. Agrippa 2, Berenice 2, and Drusilla were his mother's first cousins.

 

[Stormer0628]

---

---

---

---

WHERE THE PISOS MAKE INSIDE JOKES IN THE NEW TESTAMENT

Martial (Marcellus), who was a relative of the Pisos, jokingly points to the kind of double-talk that was used in the writing of the New Testament;

"The Golden hair that Galla wears Is hers: who would have thought it? She swears 'tis hers, and true she speaks, For I know where she bought it."
​

The writers of the New Testament were busy writing in their own kind of wit:

"I found an altar with this inscription, TO THE UNKNOWN GOD WHOM YE IGNORANTLY WORSHIP, it is him that I declare unto you."
(Acts 17:23)

"And indeed in the times of ignorance God ( Caesar ) winked."
(Acts 17:30)
​

Only when one knows that the New Testament is a mass of mixed things written by the various Piso family members is one able to make out the many inside jokes placed in the N.T. by that very same family.

"If the first fruit is holy, the lump is also holy."
(Romans 11:16)
​

Since these writers of the New Testament were descendants of the deliverers of the 'first fruit' (Judaism), they felt that they had the right to make a new religion if they felt like it. In this joke, Proculus Piso refers to the New Testament as 'the lump' (Phurama, 'lump,' 'a mass of mixed things').

"And upon this rock (Peter) I shall build my church."
(Matt. 16:18)
​

'Rock' is Petros (Peter). In the next verse, Jesus (Arrius Piso) gives the keys to heaven to Saint Peter.

Pliny the Younger helped Arrius Piso write 'Luke' and 'Acts.' However, because these people were not holy men or religious, but rather, belligerent braggarts, they ridicule the Jewish Rabbis of the day in these books and make inside jokes. Many of what are called 'inconsistencies' are actually inside jokes.

Matthew 1:17 states that there are 42 generations, but lists only 41! See 'Piso Numbers' 41 and 42.

The Tree of Life in the Hebrew/Aramaic Genesis becomes the Book of Life in the anti-Semitic N.T. books of Revelations 22:19 and Philippians 4:3.

Jesus 'shall save.' "And thou shall call his name 'Jesus' because he 'shall save' people from their sins." The New Testament was originally written in Greek (except for the Logia); this pun is aimed at the Jews—because 'Jesus' in Hebrew is 'Joshua' ('Yoshia' here), which means 'shall save.' So, Matthew 1:21 reads; "And thou shall call his name 'shall save,' because he 'shall save' people from their sins."

Jesus being the son of Joseph. Because he was the fictional son of Arrius Piso as Josephus! Various spellings of 'Joseph' and 'Josephus' make them identical.

Arrius Piso and his son Justus wrote chapters 1 through 15 of Acts; Justus (Justin Martyr), wrote chapters 16 and 17, and Pliny the Younger went on to help Justus write chapters 18 through 28 of Acts of the Apostles.

In Luke 3:26, 'Joseph' is spelled 'Josech.' Attempts have been made to explain this away as a copyist's error. These people who were writing the gospels pretended to be backward Galilean disciples, playing their part to the hilt. In their roles as backward disciples, they couldn't be too fluent in Greek, they 'had' to misspell things at times. And in so doing, they made use of those misspellings. This one combined the first half of the name 'Josephus' with the acrostic initial for 'Christ'—meaning, of course, 'Josephus is Christ.'

"Cretans are always liars!" Titus 1:12. Pliny, playing Paul, quotes Epimenides the Cretan (He is a Cretan, calling Cretans liars—i.e., himself). 'Cretan' is another way of saying 'a Greek,' and as we know, 'the family' was descended from Greeks (Philip of Macedonia and the Ptolemies).

Matt. 1:9-11. "Gold, frankincense, and myrrh." Magi came from the East, bringing gifts of gold, frankincense, and myrrh at the birth of Socrates in 469 BCE. Arrius Piso wanted it known that he was not less than Socrates. Guess who also makes note of this? 'Lucian' a.k.a. Marcus Aurelius, Piso's great-grandson!

"Salute Herodion, my kinsman," Romans 16:11. That's right, a Roman 'salute' to the Herodian hierarchy—their kinsmen! King Herod was Arrius Piso's Great-Great Grandfather!

"But of you, even the hairs of your head are all numbered." Matt. 10:30. Arrius Piso jokes about the use of his number system.

Also note that jokingly we find the phrase 'Daily Bread' in Josephus' Antiquities of the Jews (Ant. XVIII, 150 Loeb). It was Arrius Piso/Josephus who also wrote the Lord's Prayer that we find in Matthew 6:11!

Jesus' many titles
Plutarch (Abelard says Plutarch was Arrius Piso, I think he was the Roman Emperor Trajan ) affirms Arrius Piso's 'right' to use Hercules' titles by saying that Alexander the Great was a descendant of Hercules ( Plutarch, Alexander). Those titles are; 'The Prince of Peace,' 'The Good Shepherd,' 'Savior,' and 'The Only Begotten Son.' Jesus (Arrius Piso) was 'the light of the world,' because he was 'of light'—Lucius ('of light' in Greek). Arrius Piso as Jesus claimed to be the 'son of David,' as many others in his day had also claimed—including Hillel the Pharisee! But by 'son,' he meant 'descendant.' This is the correct translation from the Greek. He is also called 'the son of God,' 'the son of the living God,' and 'the likeness of God.' The only real 'living God' was Caesar—and Arrius Piso was a descendant of the deified Caesars!

Speaking in 'tongues'
Acts 2:4. "... began to speak with other tongues." The word used when saying that they spoke in 'tongues' was glossa, which is Greek for 'language.' It's another hint to say "it was written in Greek, Latin, and Hebrew." (Luke 23:38). And so it was! They used rhetoric in combination with the components of each of those languages!

Curious Jesus
They interchanged the words that they use when they say 'Lord.' Sometimes using despotes (despot), but mostly using curie/curios, meaning not only 'Lord,' but also 'curious,' 'strange,' or 'mysterious.' This is a big hint at what they were doing, especially when mentioned in conjunction with statements such as "the mystery of the Gospels." They take the Latin word curia and then turn it into its masculine form in Greek to get curios. Julius Piso hints at what they were doing in Revelations 18:8: "... for strongly curious is the God that judgeth her." And Julius even ends Revelations snidely, saying in Rev. 22:20; "Yes, come, curious (Lord) Jesus!" Rev. 22:21; "Saints!, praise the Revelations of John!" And that, of course, made them want to exclude Revelations from the canon.

The rupture of the Rapture
If you think about it, you'll soon realize that the 'second coming' of Christ, or 'The Rapture' as they call it, is a joke—like many other jokes written into the New Testament. Why is it a joke? Because in the story, Jesus came into the world once, when he was born to Mary. Then, he died—that's the first coming. Then, he came back again after three days (and that's another joke )—that is the second coming! The second coming, that Christian fundamentalists call 'The Rapture,' will never come because it had already happened in their own great Jesus story written by Arrius Piso! Note: This joke is well known within the inner circle, and is the source for the saying; "The third time is a charm."

"If any man be ignorant, let him be ignorant"—1st Cor. 14:38. A man couldn't help but be ignorant: they were burning all of the books—and writing their own! No one could write without Caesar's permission, and he only permitted his family to write. It was a closed environment! Hitler certainly had good teachers.

The third day
"... that deceiver, whilst living, said; after three days, I will arise." (Matt. 27:63); "... and after three days, (he will) rise again." (Mark 8:31). It just so happened that the cruci-fiction in the Jesus story took place on Friday, while the sun was still out, and Jesus (if he were a real person), by law, had to be taken down from the cross by dusk (not only by ordinary Roman law, but also because dusk Friday was the beginning of the Sabbath, which lasted till dusk Saturday). Let's say, for the sake of argument, that he was crucified at dawn (at 'cock-crow' as it is called), then let's count the days. Friday, 6:00 AM to Saturday 6:00 AM is one day. The last mention we have of Jesus is before the end of the Sabbath, which is Saturday at dusk. The next is that he has risen before dawn Sunday! That's not even two days! But in the story, three separate days are implied deliberately—to throw us off the trail! Just another one of those darned inconsistencies, that, by the way, is the source for the expression, "What a difference a day makes."

The Abba issue
Arrius Piso, as Jesus, calls God his father literally, with the use of the word abba. But this same word also means 'ancestor' or 'forefather'; remember, the deified 'God' Julius Caesar was an ancestor of Arrius Piso! So, read the Lord's Prayer this way; "My ancestor who art in heaven, hidden (sacred, hallowed) be thy name." Also, abba is used once by Arrius Piso writing as Josephus as a joke at the very end of chapter 4, verse 7, of Antiquities of the Jews. But he goes on to hint about it in the rest of his writings.

"For, we do not follow cunningly devised fables."
2nd Peter 1:16
​

No, they didn't follow cunningly devised fables—they were busy writing them!​

Arrius Piso starts off writing Acts by addressing it to Pliny the Younger, who, he calls Theophilus (loved of God), because he is 'loved of God'—that is, 'loved' or 'favored' by Arrius Piso and the Caesars! To find out who wrote what, you have to know the meanings of the names. They wrote the New testament in a narrative form and used different names to play the characters, as in a play. Knowing this, the New testament can be broken down into acts and scenes to see who is playing who.

In the year 6 CE, Judea became a Roman Province, which prompted Judas of Galilee to lead a rebellion against Rome. He was called 'Messiah' by the Jews. His rebellion was crushed. Then, in 44 CE, Theudas the Pharisee (who the Jews also called 'Messiah') led a revolt to gain back Judea. He was defeated. Finally, in 60 CE, Benjamin 'the Egyptian' led a revolt and was called 'Messiah'. These Pharisees were becoming a real threat to Rome. This is when Lucius Piso started to work on his story of a Messiah. Arrius Piso later inserts these 'messiahs' of the Jews in his writings to further ridicule the Jews—it was his secret way of saying: "See, it is because of these 'messiahs' of yours that we made ours."

 

[Stormer0628]

Revelations, which was written by Julius Piso, reveals the truth about Christianity. It was written specifically to be the ending to the Jesus story, and finis coronat opus ("the end crowns the work"). Julius Calpernius Piso, Arrius Piso's son, wrote Revelations in the year 137 CE. It took a little while to think out Revelations after the few events that followed the final dispersion of the Jews, which took place in the year 135. Julius used these two names in the "history" of the time, Severus and Servianus, which were derivatives of the family name inherited from his mother (Boionia "Servilia" Priscilla).

As the ending of the Jesus story, Revelations was to be the one great power that Julius had. Arrius Piso gave his sons authority over his Jesus story in this way: he gave Justus Piso the right to play Jesus (in the Fourth Gospel), and he gave Julius the right to end the story, because even early on, it was a concern of Julius' that this Jesus story not last forever.

In writing the New Testament, the family used a play on words. In Revelations, Julius used a few of his own, mixed with a few of his favorites from previous books. He uses the Piso number 42, which was used earlier in Matthew 1:17. Julius alludes to the war that he had helped Hadrian to fight, that lasted over three years. This helps to date Revelations. Where Julius Piso says "forty-two months," he is saying, three-and-a-half years! Rev. 11:2, "They shall trample upon the holy city (Jerusalem) forty-two months (three and a half years)."

And in Rev. 13:5, authority was given to the beast (ippos—Piso) to act forty-two months. And just before that he says, "Who is able to make war with the beast?" Julius means this two ways. First, he means that another beast (Piso) is able to make war with the beast (Piso). He is saying that he is able to make war with the other Pisos, and that this is the way that he was doing it. Second, he means the battle itself, paying homage to the brave Jews who died trying to fight the Pisos. In a way, he was kind of apologizing to the Jews for causing the Diaspora.

Because of an obscure passage (in Ezekiel 39:11,15), mentioning the "Valley of Hamon-Gog," Julius is able to allude to his father again by using Gog in Revelations. Josephus (Arrius Piso) wrote the first version of the book that we know of as Esther, where the character Hamen has a gallows built, only to end up being hung upon it himself. That version was written around the year 95 CE. The Jews started calling Arrius Piso Hamen or Hamon, saying that the Temple was destroyed by "Hamin" and "son of Hamin." Calling Arrius Piso "Hamin" ('Hamen'), they were saying that he worked only to hang himself in the end. Rabbi Akiba (Akiva) had rewritten the book of Esther for the Jews in 110 CE and started the holiday feast of Purim as a way for future generations to remember the great war of the Pisos against the Jews. They would make triangular cakes and pastries mimicking the Trinity and triangular numbers used by the Pisos. While the Pisos had Christians make cakes (called "cross-top buns" ) and mark them with a T for the cross.

But Julius didn't stop by just associating Hamon with Gog to identify his father: He uses Gog with Magog. Who is Magog? Justus Piso! Why? Because Justus also plays Jesus. Gog and son of Gog. They are the same as Balaam and Balak—Balaam being Arrius Piso and Balak being Justus Piso. That's why in Rev. 2:14, Julius says, "Balaam (Nicolas, Lamed Vov—i.e., Arrius Piso) taught Balak to cast a snare." Father taught son.

Here is the real reason why Santa Claus is Saint Nick. Father was Balaam, which is Hebrew for the Greek name Nicolas. Arrius already was Nicolas, because he was Nicomachus (victor of the battle). In Rev. 2:15, Julius says that he hates the Nicolaitanes (the followers of Nicolas/Balaam). (Note: Also see the Jewish Gittin.)

In Rev. 12:14, Julius says "mountains that move." A "living mountain" would move. How about a person named Mountain? Mountanus, that's Arrius Piso's other name in history.

In Rev. 3:12, he says, "the New Jerusalem." That's the Jerusalem after the war—Juppiter Capitolinus. They then called Jerusalem "JC"—after Jesus Christ/Josephus Calpernius.

Rev. 9:7: "Locusts like horses with the faces of a man." "Locusta" is a family name, and "horses" (ippos—Piso) with the face of a man is a hint at what is meant by "beast"—'beast' was a horse—i.e., ippos, which is "Piso" rearranged. Julius made several ways to check the meaning of "beast" in Revelations.

Using the number system, he simply uses the Greek word for "beast" exactly 60 times—60 being the total of the names "Kalpournios Piso." He uses the word ippos (horse) 16 times. That's P for Piso. Looking back at Luke 10:34 and Acts 23:23-24, we find that "beast" does mean "horse." And remember, Josephus was originally Josepos. Phonetically with the first o as a long o—Jos - ippos! And, of course, once we know all of this and that "horse" (ippos) is Piso, then we know that the mark of the beast (that Julius was referring to) was—the cross! My, haven't things turned around 180 degrees! Most of the family members knew Egyptian (Justus sneaks the Egyptian word baion , that is, "palm branch," into John 12:13), and Egyptian hieroglyphics were used until about the year 350 CE. The Egyptian hieroglyphic T literally meant "a mark"—of course we know that the Pisos made T stand for the cross!

The first line of Revelations, Rev. 1:1, talks about "(The) Revelation of Jesus Christ...." Yes, indeed, the revealing of Jesus! Little by little, Julius tells us that this book, Revelations , is the beginning of the end of Christianity! In Rev. 1:3 he says, "the time is near!" Yes, the time is near, because you are reading the book that brings that time near—Revelations !

In Rev. 1:5, Julius calls Jesus "the first begotten of the dead." This is first-class wit. Naturally, you'd think that it should be "the only begotten (son) of God," but this says more.

First, the superficial allusion is that Jesus was the first to be resurrected. But this was only in keeping with being able to say things with entirely different meanings without leaving the main storyline. Its alter, or double meaning, being a confirmation of what had already been suspected. "The first begotten," meaning "the eldest." Arrius was older than his sister Fannia; "of the dead' meaning of the dead father—Gaius Piso! In history, Thrasea Paetus (Gaius Piso) and his wife (Arria the Younger) consider the welfare of their "child." Yet, only one child of theirs is mentioned by name, a daughter (which was not of much consequence then), Fannia. They, were in fact, contemplating the fate of their male child—Arrius!

Rev. 1:7: "... and they pierced him." Julius is speaking of Jesus being pierced by the sword while on the cross. Then, later in Rev. 13:14, he says about the beast: "which has the wound of the sword and lived." Let's look at Rev. 1:7 one more time. "Behold, he comes out of the clouds (of confusion), and every eye shall see him, and they which pierced him, and all of the tribes of the earth shall wail on account (because) of him." Yes, now that the confusion is lifted, every eye shall see "him." He is Arrius (Josephus) Piso! And "they which pierced him" are those who broke through the code, to find out who "he" was. All of "the tribes"—the twelve tribes of the New Israel which Arrius Piso created, i.e., those in rule by the false authority derived from a synthesized code as set forth by the Piso family and their descendants in the form of rhetoric, dogma, and ideologies. And "shall wail on account of 'him.'" Not "for" him—"Him"—of course meaning Jesus (Arrius Piso). It would seem that there has been enough wailing on account of him.

Julius keeps giving hints in Revelations. In Rev. 18:16 he says "precious" to use the word/name "Timious" ("of Timothy"). To honor him that is of Timothy (Julianus)—that is, Marcus Aurelius, born 121 CE.

Perhaps another reason why 666 was chosen was because Arrius Piso's ancestor Lucius Cornelius Sylla (Sulla) Epaphroditus took control of Athens in the old Roman year 666, which was the year 85 BCE by our present calendar (the Julian calendar, established by Arrius Piso's great-grandfather, Julius Caesar, in 46 BCE). If so, this could be a further hint that it was Arrius Piso himself who was the Epaphroditus who killed Nero. Arrius Piso would have inherited the name Epaphroditus.

Julius Piso is the only family member to use the name Michael in the New testament and he uses it only in two places, Jude 9 and Rev. 12:7. Why did he use the name Michael? Because in Hebrew, Michael is like a question. It means "who is like God?" Julius puts his father's very name in Revelations by mentioning a denarius in Rev. 6:6. Julius makes Jesus (Arrius Piso) say, "I am the alpha and the omega, the first and the last." The first letter of Arrius Piso's name is A (alpha), and the last letter of Piso is O (omega). Clever, isn't it?

Revelations is jam-packed with hints and clues, and it is now serving its purpose—to be the end of the Jesus story. In Rev. 22:16, he "makes" his father say, "I am the root" (the beginning of the Christian world). And in that same sentence, he goes on to say, "and the offspring of David, the bright (Lucifer) and morning star." Ah, and now about THE SEVEN SEALS. The seven seals, which are in Rev. 6:1 - 8:13, are the keys to how they hid their identities in both history and the New Testament.

1. Arrius Piso, riding on a white (Albinus) horse (ippos—Piso), who was Arrius Piso's uncle, Lucius Piso.
2. The color code. They used a color code for names like Albinus for white, Melas for black, Fuscus for brown, Chrysos and Flavius for gold, Chlorus for green, Galen for blue, and Kokkes for red.
3. Double talk, or double meanings.
4. Inherited titles.
5. That they hid things in history.
6. Alias names. The sixth seal is 'the seal of the living god' aka the Caesars. In this part of Revelations, we have the twelve tribes of Israel, which are really the 12 sons of Jacob cleverly disquised. Where can we find this? Exodus 1:1, Rev. 7:4-8, and Josephus, Book V of Antiquities of the Jews, Chapter 1! Julius exchanges Dan for Manasses because both names tell something. He uses Manasses because Manasses was the "son of Joseph." And he omits Dan because Dan had an "only begotten son."
7. The "waters" (or "seas"), being the multitudes of "people" (water into wine). The sober masses were made drunk on the "new" wine—i.e., the New Testament. Also, in Rev. 8:13, Julius says: "Woe, woe, woe ..."—in Greek, "OUAI, OUAI, OUAI ..."—which in Hebrew is "Oy vaii, oy vaii, oy vaii! Which is to say (about the war), it is "Veii" all over again. The Roman General Marcus Furius Camillus conquered the city of Veii, which was only 8 miles North of Rome, in 396 BCE.

 

[Stormer0628]

The Revelations leads directly to Josephus.

1. The “Abba” issue. In the New Testament, Jesus, dying on the cross, calls out to God using the word “abba”—“father.” And lo, and behold, we find Josephus using this same word while describing something similar in Chapter 8, verse 7, of Wars of the Jews.
2. We find “the Egyptian” mentioned in Acts 21:38, and also in Josephus! The “Egyptian” referred to was Arrius Piso/Josephus, because Arrius Piso was also “Philo of Alexandria” (in Egypt), and he is descended from the “Ptolemies” of Egypt, and because he is of Idumean (Edomite, i.e., “Egyptian”) descent. Not to mention the fact that being a descendant of King David, he has the blood of the Egyptian Pharaohs in him, because King Solomon (David’s son), was married to a Pharaoh’s daughter!
3. We find “James” the brother of Jesus, and “John the Baptist,” along with Jesus himself in Josephus.
4. In the NT, Jesus is tempted to jump from the Temple in the exact same place that we find described in Josephus!
5. The “son” cometh! The son of God, the son of man, cometh! Hear ye, hear ye! When Josephus describes the way in which rocks were hurled over the walls by the Romans during the war, he makes the Jews look up and say, "the stone cometh!" Only, he deliberately misspells “stone.” He says, "O UIOS EPXETAI!”—"THE “SON” COMETH!" (Wars of the Jews, Josephus, Chap. VI, verse 3).
6. And, if you hadn”t already guessed, Josephus is the very first person “in history” to mention “Jesus.”
7. In Rev. 22:18–19, Julius speaks of adding or taking away from this book (not meaning the bible, or even the New Testament, but his book “Revelations”)—he didn”t want anyone changing what he had put in Revelations! And the kicker is that he even borrows this from his dad’s book Antiquities of the Jews (Chapt. X, verse VI, Book X). There, Josephus says:

In the beginning of this history, I intended to do no more than translate the Hebrew books into the Greek language, and promised them to explain those facts, without adding (anything) to them of my own, or taking (anything) away from them.​

And, reading on in Josephus, we find the letter of Aristeas, where Josephus goes on to hint about his editing the Greek Septuagint (Book XII, Chap. 2, verse 2). The Greek Septuagint is also called the “LXX” or “the Seventy.” It is alluded to in Luke 10:17.

 

[gcgram]

pa bm po, thanks dito boss

 

[Stormer0628]

There were three main alpha/numeric systems in use at the time when the New Testament was being written—Hebrew, Latin (Roman Numerals), and Greek. Until about the year 80 CE, the Greek system consisted of only an old initial system. Arrius Piso (Josephus) developed a ‘new’ Greek system and incorporated it into the New Testament.

Josephus hints at the use of triangular numbers such as 666 in his ‘Antiquities of the Jews,’ Book 12, Chapt. 2, Verse 9. He is also the ‘mathematician’ circa 100 CE called ‘Nicomachus.’ This ‘Nicomachus of Garasa’ was Josephus/Arrius Piso, because ‘Nico’ is ‘Victor’ or ‘Winner,’ and ‘Machus’ means ‘of the battle’ ( of Garasa ). Reading Josephus, one finds that

Josephus was a Roman General at the battle of Garasa in 66 CE So, Josephus was ‘Nicomachus’ ( the victor of the battle ) of Garasa. Also, in ‘history,’ Josephus is the first person to mention Garasa.

These numbers and their meanings are preserved for us in many of the books of the day, all one must do is look. Some are main numbers, and some are combined numbers. It is assumed that the Pisos didn’t use the numbers 1 or 2 as designators, because in Pythagorean mathematics (on which the number system is based), the numbers 1 and 2 are not considered numbers.


3—Stood for ‘T,’ and ‘T’ stood for the cross ( Ref. ‘The General Epistle of Barnabas,’ the Apocryphal N.T.) See 30.

4—Four is a small 40, and therefore 12 ( alluding to ‘The Twelve’).

5—A small 50 ( check 50 ).

6—Six is a small 60, standing for ‘Kalpournios Piso’ ( Greek spelling, small numbers ). 666 is a triangular number with a root of 36, which is a square with the root 6!

7—Small 70, alluding to the Greek Septuagint ( which Arrius Piso amended so as to accommodate his Jesus story ).

8—Small 80, ‘P’ ( in Greek ) for ‘Piso.’

9—In the sequence system ( Greek ), ‘I’ ( which is ‘J’ in ‘Jesus’ ), was the 9th letter of the Greek alphabet. ‘I’ is also the initial for ‘Josephus.’

10—Was ‘I’ (‘J’) for ‘Jesus’ in initial system, or ‘K’ for ‘Kalpournios’ in sequence system.

12—The Twelve Apostles, the twelve labors of Hercules, and Roman Law, which was written on twelve bronze tablets.

13—Jesus and the Twelve. Also, 10 + 3 ( Jesus/Josephus and the cross!).

14—Was equal to 60 (‘Kalpournios Piso’), in Greek numbers.

16—The 16th letter of the Greek alphabet, ‘P’ for ‘Piso.’

18—In the Apocryphal book ‘Barnabas’ 18:12, ‘18’ is 10 and 8 (‘Jesus/Piso’!). 18 is also the Pythagorean 666 (6+6+6=18).

19—Was the total of the name ‘Piso’ in small numbers.

20—’K’ for ‘Kalpournios’ in initial system. ‘Nicon’ sm. num.

22—’Christ’ (‘Xpistos’) in Greek small numbers, while at the same time, standing for the Greek letter ‘X’ in initial system.

24—’Jesus’ in Greek small numbers ( Iota, Eta, Sigma, Omicron, Upsilon, sigma ).

26—’K’ the 10th letter, plus ‘P’ the 16th letter, for ‘Kalpournios Piso’ equals 26.

27—’Pliny’ (‘Plinios’), in Greek small numbers, honoring ‘Pliny the Younger.’

29—’Piso’ as ‘Peison.’ Normally, they spelled it ‘Piso’ ( Latin form ), the Greek form is ‘Peison.’ 29 in Greek sm. num.

30—’Jesus/Flavius’ by sequence system, and the total of the name ‘Flavius’ in Greek small numbers.

33—’Flavius’ (30), and ‘the cross’ (3). Jesus died at age 33, because Arrius Piso’s ancestor ‘Alexander the Great’ died at 33.

36—The root of 666, and also the total of the original spelling of ‘Josephus’ as ‘Josepos’ (Ref. ‘Josephus,’ Jewish War, Book V, Loeb Edition), in Greek small numbers.

38—’Flavius/P’ (30+8). That is, ‘Flavius’ in Greek small numbers, and small number 8 as ‘P’ for ‘Piso.’ Or, according to pythagorean mathematic principles, 3 = ‘T’ + 8 = ‘P,’ which is ‘the cross, and Piso’!

40—’40,’ like 4, stands for ‘12’ (‘The Twelve’). 40 is also ‘M.’ Two m’s equal 80, which was ‘P’ for ‘Piso.’ That’s why Jesus’ mother was named ‘Mariam’ in the story; Arrius (Josepos) Piso’s mother’s name was Arria (Greek spelling, one ‘r,’ ‘Aria’), which, with two m’s makes a ‘P’ for ‘Piso.’ Her married name was ‘Arria Piso.’ In the N.T., sometimes ‘Mariam’ is spelled ‘Marias.’ That’s ‘M’ + Arrius! Or Arrius and the 12! (Ref. ‘The Interlinear Greek-English New Testament’—Berry).

41—’Kalpournios’ in Greek small numbers.42—42 is 30 (Flavius) + 12 (The Twelve). It is used in Matt. 1:17 as 14 + 14 + 14 =

42. And also in Rev. 13:5 as ‘42 months’ ( = 3 years ).

44—Instead of using the name ‘Flavius’ which he would inherit from his father, Justus uses the variant ‘Fabius’ which he jokingly derives from ‘fava’ (‘beans’). The names ‘Fabius’ and ‘Justus’ together totaled 44. Justus played the ‘holy’ Church Father—Justin Martyr! And he wrote the anachronistic Gospel of John (The Fourth Gospel)! Also, ‘fava’ (horse bean) ippos/Piso!

46—’Jesus Christ’ in Greek small numbers.

47—In honor of Pythagoras’ 47th theorem, the Pisos used the number 47 to denote the new Pythagoras—Arrius Piso!

50—In the Greek system ‘Nu,’ in Hebrew ‘Nun.’ This alludes to the source for the name ‘Jesus’—from the Hebrew ‘Joshua’ (‘Jesus’ in Greek) the son of Nun. In Aramaic (another semetic language), ‘Nun’ means ‘fish.’ Isn’t the son of a fish also a fish? Arrius Piso, writing as Josephus, jokes about ‘Dagon,’ the Phoenician and Philistine god who was half man and half fish. Note that even today, the ‘fish’ is still a symbol for ‘Jesus.’

60—The numerical equivalent of ‘Calpernius Piso’ in the Greek spelling; ‘Kalpournios Piso,’ in small numbers.

66—The ‘Xi’ and ‘Bau’ of the ‘Chi,’ ‘Xi,’ ‘Bau’ from 666. ‘Flavius Josepos’ (Flaouios Iosepos), which is 30 + 36 (sm. num).

67—The name ‘Piso’ in the Greek sequence system. ‘Piso’ is the family name as it is correctly spelled in Latin. However, the family used Greek letters to spell it when giving it numerical value. The spelling of the name in Greek is ‘Peison.’

70—Alluding the the Greek Septuagint, which is also Piso’s signature of 41 and 29 (‘Kalpournios Peison’).

80—The ‘P’ in Piso in the Greek initial system.

87—The ‘pos’ in ‘Josepos,’ and the phonetic ‘pas’ of ‘Puthagopas’ ( Pythagoras ). They saw the Greek ‘R’ as the Latin ‘P’ (Ref. ‘Suetonius,’ ‘The Twelve Caesars,’ ‘Augustus’ #88).

90—As 30 and 60.

96—This stood for Arrius Piso’s son ‘Alex’ in Greek initial system. But Piso’s first son (Alex), whom he named after his ancestor ‘Alexander the Great,’ died (about the year 95 CE). Pliny the Younger took the number when he married Arrius Piso’s granddaughter (who was Alex’s daughter), and in effect, became a new son with the name ‘Alexander,’ as the masculine form of ‘Calpurnia Alexandra’ whom Pliny married. Reference for this is in ‘Lucian,’ written by Marcus Aurelius.

99—Honor to Pliny the Younger as the total of his full name; ‘Gaios Kaikilios Sekoundos Plinious,’ in Greek small numbers. In the New Testament, the word ‘Amen’ was used to honor Pliny the Younger, because it too totaled 99. What Christian knows that they honor Pliny the Younger every time they use the word ‘Amen’? None. But we do.

100—’K.P.’ by Greek initial system. Also ‘C’ for ‘Calpernius’ in Latin initial system.

136—This is 100 + 36.

144—This is 44 plus 100 (Fabius Justus Kalpournios Piso). An example of its use is in ‘Revelations.’ In Rev. 7:4, ‘144,000’ is spelled out with full words for each number, 100 (ekaton), 44 (tesserakonta, tessares), ‘Thousand’ or ‘One Thousand’ (Chiliades, or Chiliados).

180—’C’ from Latin, ‘P’ from Greek, the initials for ‘Calpernius Piso.’

200—Using the Greek ‘R’ (P) as a designation for the Latin ‘P’ for ‘Piso’ totaled 100 in Greek initial system and combined with ‘C’ for ‘Calpernius’ from the Latin system (100), equaled 200.

300—Stood for ‘T,’ which represented the cross (Ref. ‘The General Epistle of Barnabas’).

316—Like 38, ‘T’ and ‘P’ (The cross, and Piso).

318—The cross and Pythagorean 666 (300 + 6 + 6 + 6 = 318). Also, 300 as the cross, with 10 as ‘J’ for ‘Jesus/Josephus,’ and 8 as ‘P’ for ‘Piso.’

600—The ‘X’ or ‘Chi’ (Kai) of ‘Chi,’ ‘Xi,’ ‘Bau’ (600, 60, 6). 600 is the numerical value of the initial ‘X’ which is ‘Ch’ in English and stands for ‘Christ.’ It is the first letter of the name ‘Christ’ in Greek, and therefore is an acrostic initial for ‘Christ.’

616—When the Church was deciding whether or not to continue to include ‘Revelations’ into the Christian canon (because of 666, its checking number, and other allusions), they opted to try to change 666 to 616 in the manuscripts so as to throw off the checking system and yet still honor Christ/Piso (600 = ‘Christ,’ 16 = ‘Piso’). See ‘Council of Nicaea in Bithynia (c. 325 CE).

666—When Julius Piso wrote ‘Revelations’ and gave the number 666 ( He was pointing to his dad, who uses 666 once in his writtings as ‘Josephus’ ), he put in a checking number that would be the total of the names ‘Jesus’ and ‘Christ.’ This is how he did it. He made the total of the entire last phrase of Rev. 13:18 add up to the checking number, which was 2,368. The total of the checking number was from the Greek initial system, and so was the entire last phrase of Rev. 13:18, except for ... 666! Because it was not only a part of the total, but also a separate number unto itself. 666 wasn’t written out as it could have been written, in the form of words (like ‘144,000’ was); ‘Six Hundred, Sixty-Six.’ No, it was written in the form of three letters with numerical values! Those letters are, ‘Chi,’ ‘Xi,’ ‘Bau.’ ‘Chi’ stands for ‘Christ’ and has a numerical value of 600. The other part of 666 was ‘Xi’ and ‘Bau.’ This was 66 in small numbers. 66 was the total of the name ‘Flavius Josephus’ (Josepos) in small numbers. What 666 is, is ‘Christ/Flavius Josephus’ or ‘Christ’ (Jesus) ‘was’ Flavius Josephus! Arrius Piso himself, writting as Josephus, uses the number 666 to denote himself when saying how ‘gold’ was given to King Solomon. He says; ‘666’ talents of ‘gold.’ ‘Gold’ meaning ‘Flavius’ (Ref. ‘Josephus,’ ‘Ant. of the Jews,’ Chapt. 7, verse 2). He was hinting at his descent from King Solomon through King David, as he does in Matthew 1:6, when he plays Jesus!

888—’Jesus’ in Greek initial system (IHSOUS). This was part of the checking number for 666. Recently, 888 has been seen as part of an order number for a video tape of the Pope’s visit to Los Angeles that was advertised on television.

1000—’Ch’ (Chi) for ‘Christ’ in the ‘old’ initial system (Greek), which was in use even before Piso made his number system. 1000 was used in lieu of the actual name ‘Christ’ so as to keep the meanings hidden (sacred,hallowed), in ‘Revelations.’

2368—The ‘checking number’ for 666, which by Pythagorean math principles, adds up to ‘19’ ( 2 + 3 + 6 + 8 = 19 ). That’s the name ‘Piso’ in the Greek small number system!

Why did they use code? They were forced to use code. As Abelard Reuchlin says:

“The Pisos, through Imperial power, were using the new faith deliberately as their instrument of control of the masses. Writing of this openly would have brought Rome’s swift vengeance and the destruction of the Jewish people.”​

Through the Gospels, epistles, and ‘history,’ the Pisos and their relatives recreated the environment of the Roman Empire. They advised the masses to be humble and to respect authority (their own synthesized and ill gotten authority). They advised servants (slaves) to be subject to their masters (Peter 1, 2:18), no matter how they were treated! For, ‘their’ reward was waiting for them in heaven (Matt. 6:20).

Later, when the family tried to omit ‘Revelations’ from the canon, Eusebius (Julius Constantius 2, Constantine’s son), tried to throw inquisitive minds off the trail by saying something similar to—”I guess Christians put a mention of Christ in Josephus.” They were descendants of Piso, coming down the line through Marcus Aurelius. Julius Constantius 2 took the ‘nomes de plume’ of ‘Eusebius’ because it was the masculine form of his second wife’s name of ‘Eusebia’ (‘Hesu,’ ‘Bios’).

 

[wahpet]

Ty sa post

 

[amamamama17]

maraming maramingmaraming maraming maraming salamat po

 

[Stormer0628]

Ty sa post

and

maraming maramingmaraming maraming maraming salamat po

Welcome. Will try to update this thread asap.

 

[Stormer0628]

One of the rewards of reading history is digging up information that aside from shedding light on current events, will also bring you face-to-face with enormous irony or twisted humor if you are up to it.

Take, as an example, the claim of Joseph Smith that their religion trace back to the earliest Christians long before Jesus Christ himself appeared in history. Smith was understandably mocked to no end for that, but does the man himself had reason to put himself in the spot like that?

It turns out that not all were laughing with the methodologies of Smith to enlarge his flock. Forgotten pages of history do back him up. The cult of Christ existed before Jesus Christ, and were it not for the Council of Nicea, this previous cult would have probably survived to this day albeit not as influential as the one that superseded it.

But before that, we must understand the workings of the mind of an empire.

When Alexander the Great absorbed most the known kingdoms of his time, he was surprised that many cultures were not as rational as Greece was. Instead, these cultures entertained many gods, and made a habit of making gods of their living rulers. It wasn't long before he realized that his legacy would not stand within those he conquered if he did not bear this divine insignia himself. The rest, as they say, is history, when Alexander adopted the ways of the Egyptians and announced himself a divine emperor.

The Greeks back home mocked him, but Alexander knew better. The Ptolemies, his successors, also understood it, and perpetuated the practice. So did the Romans ages after them. Caesars became gods living or after their deaths. You become god, and you must adopt all the other gods of your other subjects—or recalcitrant targets—if you stand to have any hope of absorbing or integrating them into your empire. The Holy Roman Empire tried that with making Gautama Buddha a saint, but European empire had never known a stronger culture as the Indians, who merely laughed at their faces for such cheap tricks. So back to Europe then.

The origin of the “Savior” – Later becoming the person worshiped today as Jesus Christ
Ptolemy 1 Meryamun Setepenre (c.a. 367-283 BCE — Before Common Era; aka Soter, which means savior) became the first European pharaoh of Egypt through military force led by Alexander Great. When Ptolemy became pharaoh of Egypt, he wanted the Egyptians to consecrate him as a god. He wanted to be called a god because that was the title all of the pharaohs of Egypt were called prior to him.

However, the people of Egypt refused to call him a god because they knew the only reason he became a pharaoh was through force, so in 305 BC, Ptolemy took the title of Pharaoh, taking the Egyptian name Meryamun Setepenre, which means “Beloved of Amun (Amun means God) Chosen of Ra (Ra means God),” and because of the Egyptians' refusal to acknowledge him as a God, he began killing the people of Egypt, which caused the Egyptian priests at Memphis to give into his request by agreeing to consecrate him to priesthood in order to save their own lives.

The key words in the above passage to keep in mind during your reading: Meryamun, Setepenre, Soter, which are words that were used to create the fictitious character of JESUS CHRIST in AD325 by Roman Emperor Constantine (Meryamun, Setepenre, Soter were used before the era we call BC). The images of Ptolemy below, which are similar to the images that are depicted as “Jesus” today, were forced upon the Africans and were ordered to be worshiped by the people of Rome. Let us continue to AD.

---

Serapis Christus Greco Roman c.a 135 BCE
The marble image in the London museum is the image they use
of Christ (Jesus) today. Christus was also the nickname for Serapis.​

---

What is Serapis? (Origin of JESUS CHRIST)
Ptolemy’s rule was to create a deity that would be worshiped by both the Egyptians and the Greeks. He created "Serapis," the made up Graeco-Egyptian god that was invented in the 3rd century BC, portrayed as Greek in appearance, but with Egyptian accessories, representing both wealth and resurrection.

“Egypt, which you commended to me my dearest Servianus, I have found to be wholly fickle and inconsistent and continually wafted about by every breath of fame. The worshipers of Serapis here are called Christians and those who are devoted to the god Serapis (I find) call themselves Bishops of Christ.”
— Hadrian to Servianus AD134​

Constantine and Arius
Constantine the Great, Roman Emperor from AD 306 to 337, is known for being the first Roman emperor to be converted to Christianity. Strangely enough, Arius of Libya (AD 256-356) born of African descent centuries after Ptolemy 1, had a problem with the Roman empire when he was teaching the Africans and the people of Rome to worship a statue and to celebrate death. He was considered a heretic, a professed believer (of God) who maintains religious opinions contrary to those accepted by his or her church (what the religious authorities, usually controlled by government, deem as the truth). Because he started attracting so many followers due to his teachings that were contrary to the Romans, Constantine called the Council of Nicea by summoning all the bishops to discredit Arius. During the time when this meeting was called upon, there was no mention of Jesus Christ at all; no man had ever existed by the name JESUS Christ, and an important fact is that this all took place Anno Domino (AD) (which Christians claim means after the death of Christ), in Latin means "in the year of the lord." The name Jesus Christ didn’t exist before the meeting was called (read the statements made during that time frame). It was only after this that they presented to the people the name JESUS CHRIST.

What Lord are they referring to? Kings have always been referred to as Lords or Gods.

If Jesus Christ didn’t exist during the time this meeting took place nor ever heard of, whom are people worshiping today? Serapis Christus?

Nicean Creed – Jesus Christ is born
The Nicean Creed, which became the statement of the Christian faith, was written, decreed, and sanctified by 318 Roman Catholic bishops at the council in AD 325 (some believe this transformation took place during the “Council of Chalcedon” on AD 451).

“We believe in one God the Father all-powerful of all things both seen and unseen one Lord Jesus Christ the Son of God the only begotten from the father, that is from the substance of the father, god from god, light from light, true god from true god, begotten not made, consubstantial with the father, through whom all things came to be both those in heaven and those in earth for us humans and for out salvation he came down and became incarnate became human suffered and rose up on the third day went up into the heavens is coming to judge the living and the dead and in the holy spirit”

—The origin of the Trinity​

The authorities shut Arius down and threatened him with death to keep his mouth shut. They positioned the creed during the time when people started becoming aware of the lies and deception, and ordered all books to be burned; destroying all ancient writings, “no evidence no argument,” and the outcome was the transformation from Serapis Christus, which means Christ the Savior, to Jesus Christ by edict of Emperor Constantine in AD 325

REFERENCE