Tama po ba kung di dahil sa Catholic walang bible?

[spyx3m_119]

eh kayo kelan lang kayo lumitaw? patawa hahaha so tanong ko sayo sino nagcompile? hahaha

nakakita lang ng jehova sa bible ipinangalan na sa sekta nila para nga naman masabi biblical.. kakakilabot

hilig mamuna sa ibang bakuran pero sa sariling bakuran hindi mapuna #hipokrito kakakilabot

Bkit nawala ka sa isang thread asusbyte??? hindi ba kinaya? hahahaha

backread ka doon nasagot yan... wag kang magmalaki jan wala ka namang nai-prove...

And for your information that is not how JW was established... i KNOW my religions history, Catholic, Episcopalian and Islam and JW (been with all of this, some in a short while... Catholic... almost all my life) .... Don't lecture me about church history bcoz I Have studied it more than you have...

- - - Updated - - -

pareho lang kayo nakakatawa

You are generalizing here... careful with your words... I never have said anything offending or claim anything at all....

 

[asusbyte]

Bkit nawala ka sa isang thread asusbyte??? hindi ba kinaya? hahahaha

backread ka doon nasagot yan... wag kang magmalaki jan wala ka namang nai-prove...

And for your information that is not how JW was established... i KNOW my religions history, Catholic, Episcopalian and Islam and JW (been with all of this, some in a short while... Catholic... almost all my life) .... Don't lecture me about church history bcoz I Have studied it more than you have...

Alam mo pla history eh so ang tanong sino nagcompile?
- - - Updated - - -

You are generalizing here... careful with your words... I never have said anything offending or claim anything at all....

Hahaha nagmamalinis pa eh katawa tawa ka naman talaga

 

[kagidka]

Mga Hari at apostle sumalat sa biblia..

 

[RebiRth67]

Diyos po otor ng biblia inutusan nya mga tao pra isulat ang biblia same sequence pra pagsamasamahin ang mga pahina ng biblia at ipaalam
sa mga tao ang kanyang mga gawa..
widen your minds..
don't claim the bible for yourselves..
Jehova own's it..

 

[shamayin]

eh kayo kelan lang kayo lumitaw? patawa hahaha so tanong ko sayo sino nagcompile? hahaha

nakakita lang ng jehova sa bible ipinangalan na sa sekta nila para nga naman masabi biblical.. kakakilabot

hilig mamuna sa ibang bakuran pero sa sariling bakuran hindi mapuna #hipokrito kakakilabot

Do you know the difference between a catholic and a roman catholic?

 

[spyx3m_119]

Alam mo pla history eh so ang tanong sino nagcompile?
- - - Updated - - -

Nasagot na po kasi yan... ayaw nyo intindihin...

Hindi po isang tao o grupo ng tao lang ang nagcompile ng Bible na gamit natin ngayon... Search nyo nalang po kay Mr. Google at kuya Wiki...

(1) Ang pag determine sa bible cannon ay unang pinasimulan ng mga Jewish Rabbi's and Scholars. (Old Testament)
(2) With regards to New Testament... may mga ilang passage sa bible that shows which of the books are considered part of the scripture... although the list is not comprehensive... it shows that the process of cannonizing the scripture is a long process and is not done in 1 single time... Halimbawa kinukunsider ni Apostol Pablo ang Aklat ng Lucas as authorithative and is equal to Old Testament books... (1 Timothy 5:18; see also Deuteronomy 25:4 and Luke 10:7). Peter recognized Paul’s writings as Scripture (2 Peter 3:15-16). Some of the books of the New Testament were being circulated among the churches (Colossians 4:16; 1 Thessalonians 5:27).
(3) You are confusing the early christians church with catholic church that is why you have the notion that sa inyo nanggaling ang bible which is wrong... Peshitta Bible is 1 of the earliest copy of the bible around 1st Century and the catholic is not the one who compiled this... same goes with Old Latin Vulgate (Which is not the same as the Latin Vulgate that Jerome compiled)... John Wycliffe and Tyndale even have thier bible already published even long before the catholic church published what they thought would be is the cannonical bible... this is arount 18th century na... The Sinaiticus (A) and the Vaticanus(B) is the version that they approved which is impure and full of corrections....
(4) SO base on this, catholic ang comopya sa ibang group and idinagdag nila yung ibang mga non-cannonical writings... Which serves as no purpose other than to confuse the readers... heheheh. :P

Hahaha nagmamalinis pa eh katawa tawa ka naman talaga

Pfft....

 

[knowledge seeker]

Nasagot na po kasi yan... ayaw nyo intindihin...

Hindi po isang tao o grupo ng tao lang ang nagcompile ng Bible na gamit natin ngayon... Search nyo nalang po kay Mr. Google at kuya Wiki...

(1) Ang pag determine sa bible cannon ay unang pinasimulan ng mga Jewish Rabbi's and Scholars. (Old Testament)
(2) With regards to New Testament... may mga ilang passage sa bible that shows which of the books are considered part of the scripture... although the list is not comprehensive... it shows that the process of cannonizing the scripture is a long process and is not done in 1 single time... Halimbawa kinukunsider ni Apostol Pablo ang Aklat ng Lucas as authorithative and is equal to Old Testament books... (1 Timothy 5:18; see also Deuteronomy 25:4 and Luke 10:7). Peter recognized Paul’s writings as Scripture (2 Peter 3:15-16). Some of the books of the New Testament were being circulated among the churches (Colossians 4:16; 1 Thessalonians 5:27).
(3) You are confusing the early christians church with catholic church that is why you have the notion that sa inyo nanggaling ang bible which is wrong... Peshitta Bible is 1 of the earliest copy of the bible around 1st Century and the catholic is not the one who compiled this... same goes with Old Latin Vulgate (Which is not the same as the Latin Vulgate that Jerome compiled)... John Wycliffe and Tyndale even have thier bible already published even long before the catholic church published what they thought would be is the cannonical bible... this is arount 18th century na... The Sinaiticus (A) and the Vaticanus(B) is the version that they approved which is impure and full of corrections....
(4) SO base on this, catholic ang comopya sa ibang group and idinagdag nila yung ibang mga non-cannonical writings... Which serves as no purpose other than to confuse the readers... heheheh. :P


Pfft....

Kailan naman iyan?


Alin doon ang dinagdag?

 

[spyx3m_119]

Kailan naman iyan?

Hindi po ba ninyo nabasa ang sagot dito:

Nasagot na po kasi yan... ayaw nyo intindihin...

Hindi po isang tao o grupo ng tao lang ang nagcompile ng Bible na gamit natin ngayon... Search nyo nalang po kay Mr. Google at kuya Wiki...

(1) Ang pag determine sa bible cannon ay unang pinasimulan ng mga Jewish Rabbi's and Scholars. (Old Testament)
(2) With regards to New Testament... may mga ilang passage sa bible that shows which of the books are considered part of the scripture... although the list is not comprehensive... it shows that the process of cannonizing the scripture is a long process and is not done in 1 single time... Halimbawa kinukunsider ni Apostol Pablo ang Aklat ng Lucas as authorithative and is equal to Old Testament books... (1 Timothy 5:18; see also Deuteronomy 25:4 and Luke 10:7). Peter recognized Paul’s writings as Scripture (2 Peter 3:15-16). Some of the books of the New Testament were being circulated among the churches (Colossians 4:16; 1 Thessalonians 5:27).
(3) You are confusing the early christians church with catholic church that is why you have the notion that sa inyo nanggaling ang bible which is wrong... Peshitta Bible is 1 of the earliest copy of the bible around 1st Century and the catholic is not the one who compiled this... same goes with Old Latin Vulgate (Which is not the same as the Latin Vulgate that Jerome compiled)... John Wycliffe and Tyndale even have thier bible already published even long before the catholic church published what they thought would be is the cannonical bible... this is arount 18th century na... The Sinaiticus (A) and the Vaticanus(B) is the version that they approved which is impure and full of corrections....
(4) SO base on this, catholic ang comopya sa ibang group and idinagdag nila yung ibang mga non-cannonical writings... Which serves as no purpose other than to confuse the readers... heheheh. :P

Basa-basa and intindihin po kasi muna pag may time....

Alin doon ang dinagdag?

Ano po ba pagkakaintindi nyo sa Pseudepigrapha, Appocrypa, or Deuterocanonical???

Alam nyo po ba kung alin ang protocanonical books? That would actually answer your question...

 

[knowledge seeker]

Iyan po ay naglalaman ng wisdom, macabeo.

Yung James po aalisin rin sana at mapapabilang bilang deuterocanonical. Or appocrypa.

At even sa pinagmamalaki minsan na bagong tuklas na dead sea scroll kabilang po iyan. At mas matanda pa sa mas matandang sipi na nakalahad ng lantaran. Mas marami pa ngang nilalaman ang dead sea scroll.

 

[fpgonzales]

para po sakin ang Biblia at Kasulatan ay synonyms.

Kaya cnasabi ba nila na kung wala ang Katoliko eh wala ding Kasulatan?

Ang pagkakaalam ko po kc wala pa ang tinatawag na Biblia eh umiiral na ang Kasulatan.

At hindi rin po ang Katoliko sa pagkakaalam ko ang gumawa ng Kasulatan, kundi ang mga propeta.

 

[asusbyte]

Eh sino nga po ang kinasangkapan ng Diyos para mapili kung alin aklat ang dapat isama sa pagcompile ng bible? At sino ang kinasankapan ng Diyos para macompile ito? Yan lang naman ang tanong na pilit nyo iniiwasan at hindi sinasagot..

 

[Geroll]

One Holy Catholic And Apostolic Church of Jesus Christ 33A.D. na itinayo sa Jerusalem nagkaroon lang ng Schism dahil sa di pagkaka intindihan Pero Iisa kaya may tinatawag na Western, Eastern, Oriental Catholic Church. Holy see of Rome, Jerusalem, Antioch, Alexandrea, Byzantium(Constantinople), etc.. at ung mga protestante na tinatawag mula kay martin Luther Si martin Luther ay galing sa western Christianity o Rome. nagkaloko loko na dahil kay luther hanggang sa umabot na ng 40,000.

 

[jabecon]

Gaya po ng title tama po ba na kung di dahil sa catholic eh wala daw po bible ngayon

gaya po sabi ng isang member dito na inaangkin na ang bible daw eh sa knila

i dont think so.

 

[pustiso]

Kung christian bible ang pinag uusapan
Catholic ang nagpa canon

Hebrew bible naman pag sa jewish canon

Yng mga protestant wala pang ikinanon na bible

 

[dendut45]

hoy mgabilat hi inah nyo kamu, sibuh-sibuh da kamu kaduwa sah, mga rupang,

 

[elbert82]

Isang malaking kalokohan ang tread na ito.

 

[Newme1]

Well totoo naman karamihan ng mga pinagsasasabi ninyo.

yung nabasa ko kasi sa libro ni Dr. Zaide, na nabanngit si Bible, eh mayroong Part ng bible na pinasimulan ng mga Jews o Hudyo. Sila yung unang bayan ng Diyos, as you know that was the first five books at yung mga libro ng propeta.

Which is used by Christ to teach.

Then the other parts was made by the apostles of Christ. Tama?

So if we look deep in the History of the Bible, There is two, the New and the Old Testament.

Admit it na kung walang Old Testament at New Testament, WALA RING BIBLE.

tsaka bago pa maitatag ang Roman Catholic Church, mayroon na po itong counterpart, which is the Eastern Church. Na qualified angkinin ang Holy Bible dahil ang pinaka-unified at unang bible na magkasama ang Old at New Testament ay nakasulat po sa Greek Language.

Eastern Orthodox yata yun? Tapos Humiwalay lang ang Rome dito kaya Tinawag na Roman Catholic Church.

Anyway yan po yung info na nalaman ko sa seminarista na isang buwan nalang ay oordenahan na sa pagkapari, na nainterview ko. Hope it Helps!

God Bless Guys!

 

[pustiso]

walang counter part ang simbahang katoliko. brother religion niya ang orthodox church. pareho lang sila ng teaching, puro tradition nagkaiba lang sa pamamahala.

orhodox - st james
roman catholic - st peter

magkakapatid sa pananampalataya

 

[skeptcode]

Sino si Emperor Constantine po

 

[knowledge seeker]

constantine

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constantine_the_Great