Symbianize Forum

Most of our features and services are available only to members, so we encourage you to login or register a new account. Registration is free, fast and simple. You only need to provide a valid email. Being a member you'll gain access to all member forums and features, post a message to ask question or provide answer, and share or find resources related to mobile phones, tablets, computers, game consoles, and multimedia.

All that and more, so what are you waiting for, click the register button and join us now! Ito ang website na ginawa ng pinoy para sa pinoy!

Usaping utang: Essential info muna bago magtalo-talo

Stormer0628

Symbianize Angel
Advanced Member
Messages
2,145
Reaction score
5
Points
28


USAPANG UTANG: ALAMIN MUNA ANG MAHALAGANG INFO :p



Tandaan:
An informed citizen is the best asset of a country. It is best to discuss an issue with solid information rather than fleeting passions and emotions.



SHORT HISTORY OF PHILIPPINE NATIONAL DEBT


  • In 1961, Diosdado Macapagal departed from the nationalist policies of predecessor Carlos Garcia and he embraced free enterprise and opened doors to free investment.
  • In return, the United States, the International Monetary Fund, and the World Bank offered the government huge loans. It was thought that the foreign capital could be a catalyst for development. This was however our entry into the debt trap.
  • When Ferdinand Marcos became president in 1965, he continued Macapagal's economic liberalization policies. The immediate result was that the debt rose from 277.7 million dollars to 840.2 million by the end of his term. When Marcos imposed martial law, the trend toward economic liberalization accelerated. And he borrowed from outside to finance deficit and nationalists like Tañada, Recto, Garcia, and Diokno did not even oppose this decision.
  • Almost 35 years after Marcos' regime, his successors were still not able to rescue the country from debts and rather only increased it.



External Debt -The portion of a country's debt that was borrowed from foreign lenders including commercial banks, governments or international financial institutions. These loans, including interest, must usually be paid in the currency in which the loan was made.

Internal debt - The part of the total debt in a country that is owed to lenders within the country. A country occasionally needs to borrow from institutional and individual investors for budgetary purposes.

National Debt - Total outstanding borrowings of a central government comprising of internal (owing to national creditors) and external (owing to foreign creditors) debt incurred in financing its expenditure.

A debt crisis ensues when a national government cannot pay the debt it owes and seeks, as a result, some form of assistance. It deals with national economies, international loans and national budgeting. The definitions of "debt crisis" have varied over time, with major institutions such as Standard and Poor's or the International Monetary Fund (IMF) offering their own views on the matter.

Debt-to-GDP ratio
The Debt-to-GDP ratio is the proportion of a country’s Federal debt in relation to its total output or GDP. According to the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP), the ratio of what the Philippines owes from foreign creditors (external debt) to what it has been producing (GDP) has gone through a significant growth from 61.6% in 1999 to 68.2% in 2001. The ratio fluctuates until 2004 where it started a steady decline up to 2008. It rose again to 38.4% in 2009, but eventually fell down to 36.9% in 2010. Up until last year, the trend is declining, with a 27.3% ratio at the end of 2014. Figures have generally been fluctuating (in terms of public and private external debt). Governments basically aim for low debt-to-GDP ratios because such is an indicator that the economy is producing high enough output to pay off its borrowings.


Debt-to-Revenue Ratio
The debt-to-revenue, according to the NTRC, is an important calculation in evaluating the government’s ability to manage its debt. It measures the percentage of total revenue that is allocated to debt principal and interest payments. With the constant increase in the debt to revenue ratio, it becomes more difficult for the government to handle its national debt.


From almost a steady ratio of 420% in 2000-2001, the country’s debt-to-revenue ratio went down to 364% and 354% in 2011 and 2012, respectively. However, ratio started to soar as high as 539% in 2004. Between 2005-2007, the ratio slipped to as low as 327% then rose again to 391% in 2010.


Debt service ratio
Republic Act 6142 of 1970 defined the debt-service ratio as the proportion of the Philippines’ principal and interest payments on medium- and long-term debt to total external receipts or export earnings.For the past 15 years, the Philippines’ debt service burden (DSB) to exports on goods and receipts from services and income noticeably fell over half from 14.6% in 1999 to 6.2% in 2014. From 2001 to 2009, the figures have been fluctuating. However, the ratios for 2009 until 2014 maintained a trend of decline. This is preferred since low debt service ratio characterize better international finances.

Major Risks of Debt Crisis

  1. High external debts are believed to have harmful effects to the economy.
  2. The reputation of a country is also at stake when external debt is looked at and may discourage investments to enter into the country.
  3. The present foreign investors in the country would be expected to pull capital out of the country.
  4. It would lead to a decline in the Peso, making the debt burden (which is largely denominated in dollars) more onerous.



attachment.php


External Debt of the Philippines decreased to 77.474 Billion USD in 2015 from77.673 Billion USD in 2014. It averaged 42.42706 Billion USD from 1981 until 2013, reaching an all-time high of 60.442 USD Million in 2011 and a record low of 20.893 Billion USD in 1981. External Debt of the Philippines is reported by the Bangko Sentral Ng Pilipinas.


attachment.php


The Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of Philippines was worth 272.02 billion US dollars in 2013. The GDP value of Philippines represents 0.44 percent of the world economy. GDP of the Philippines averaged 60.12 USD Billion from 1960 until 2013, reaching an all-time high of 272.02 USD Billion in 2013 and a record low of 4.40 USD Billion in 1962.

attachment.php


The Gross Domestic Product (GDP) of the Philippines expanded 5.30 percent in the third quarter of 2014 over the same quarter of the previous year. GDP Annual Growth Rate averaged 5.02 Percent from 2001 until 2014, reaching an all-time high of 8.90 Percent in the second quarter of 2010 and a record low of 0.50 Percent in the third quarter of 2009. GDP Annual Growth Rate of Philippines is reported by the Philippine National Statistical Coordination Board.



attachment.php


The Philippines recorded a Government Debt to GDP of 49.20 percent of the country's Gross Domestic Product in 2013. Government Debt To GDP in Philippines averaged 58.35 Percent from 1990 until 2013, reaching an all-time high of 74.90 Percent in 1993 and a record low of 49.20 Percent in 2013. Government Debt To GDP of Philippines is reported by the Bureau of the Treasury, Philippines.

Generally, Government debt as a percent of GDP is used by investors to measure a country's ability to make future payments on its debt, thus affecting the country's borrowing costs and government bond yields.

attachment.php


The Philippines recorded a Government Budget deficit equal to 1.40 percent of the country's Gross Domestic Product in 2013. Government Budget in Philippines averaged -2.17 Percent of GDP from 1988 until 2013, reaching an all time high of 1 Percent of GDP in 1994 and a record low of -5.30 Percent of GDP in 2002. Government Budget in Philippines is reported by the Department of Finance of the Philippine Republic.

Government Budget is an itemized accounting of the payments received by government (taxes and other fees) and the payments made by government (purchases and transfer payments). A budget deficit occurs when an government spends more money than it takes in. The opposite of a budget deficit is a budget surplus.

HOW DOES THE PHILIPPINE GOVERNMENT PAY ITS EXTERNAL DEBT?

Debt Service - The cash that is required for a particular time period to cover the repayment of interest and principal on a debt. Debt service is often calculated on a yearly basis.

Debt burden is the cost of servicing the public debt. Most of this debt burden is a really transfer from one generation to another.

The previous administration viewed that maintaining a budget deficit at 2% of GDP, equivalent to P283.7 billion, would allow the administration to continue pursuing reforms to increase revenue collections without burdening the people with additional debt.

Borrowings
The projected deficit for 2015 is P283.7 billion. To cover this gap between disbursements and revenues, the administration will borrow P700.8 billion, reducing the country’s debt stock while also helping develop domestic capital markets.

The goal is to raise 86.3% of the borrowing program (P605.1 billion) through the issuance of treasury bills and bonds to local investors. The remaining 13.7% (P95.7 billion) will be sourced externally through concessional loans from development partners and the issuance of dollar bonds in global capital markets.

Good News!
The Philippines continues to pare down its foreign debt servicing to $1.538 billion as of this year or 37.32 percent less than the $2.454 billion in the same period last year, the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) reported.

Estimated Calculation for Debt Burden for both foreign and domestic debts of the Philippines:

Based on the 2015 Annual Budget
Debt Burden - P399.4 billion
Domestic Debt Increase per annum resulting from budget deficit- P700.8 billion (That if the government can stabilize the budget deficit of 2% out of the total GDP.
Foreign Debt Service- $3.09 Billion ( P137.63 Billion)

Philippine Debt Sustainability
Debt sustainability is a major issue, particularly for countries facing higher public debts, such as what most advanced economies are currently experiencing. These countries are vulnerable to rollover risks as maturing debt obligations could become more expensive to refinance considering that investors will demand significant premium to compensate for the greater risks that they will be assuming. The punitive action of the market through higher borrowing costs will make it more difficult for these countries to service their obligations, creating a vicious cycle of debt trap. This could be aggravated when governments planning to undertake unpopular measures that will increase revenues and/or reduce public expenditures face political backlash that render them not politically feasible.

According to NTRC, the country’s debt sustainability assessment for 2012-2017 shows that investors have a positive outlook on the country’s economy.

It is said that a high debt level could be perceived as sustainable by investors if it is decreasing. The country’s projected debt sustainability from 2012 to 2017 depicts downward trends in debt-to-GDP and debt-to-revenue that lead to further improvement in market perceptions. The ratio indicates that for every PhP100 worth of goods and services the country produces in the economy between the years 2012-2017, the country must use around PhP42 to PhP55 for debt repayment.

However, it is still fundamental for the government to practice proper debt management to avoid payment defaults and/or debt service eating up much of the revenues of the government (debt overhang).



Additional Figures

attachment.php


attachment.php


attachment.php


View attachment 291702

Essential Debt Indicators (to follow, no more room for attachment)
 

Attachments

  • figure 01.png
    figure 01.png
    53.8 KB · Views: 1
  • figure 01.png
    figure 01.png
    20.7 KB · Views: 308
  • figure 02 GDP.png
    figure 02 GDP.png
    35.8 KB · Views: 305
  • figure03 GDP annual growth rate.png
    figure03 GDP annual growth rate.png
    33.5 KB · Views: 306
  • figure04 debt to gdp ratio.png
    figure04 debt to gdp ratio.png
    35.9 KB · Views: 306
  • figure05 govt budget percentage of GDP.png
    figure05 govt budget percentage of GDP.png
    32 KB · Views: 302
  • additional01.PNG
    additional01.PNG
    41 KB · Views: 302
  • additional02.PNG
    additional02.PNG
    34.1 KB · Views: 301
  • additional03.PNG
    additional03.PNG
    32.7 KB · Views: 303
  • Long-Term and Short-Term Debts.PNG
    Long-Term and Short-Term Debts.PNG
    59.7 KB · Views: 2
Last edited:
Kindly include this:

Risks of external debt to Philippine economy
According to Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas:

Debt sustainability is a major issue, particularly for countries facing higher public debts, such as what most advanced economies are currently experiencing. These countries are vulnerable to rollover risks as maturing debt obligations could become more expensive to refinance considering that investors will demand significant premium to compensate for the greater risks that they will be assuming. The punitive action of the market through higher borrowing costs will make it more difficult for these countries to service their obligations, creating a vicious cycle of debt trap. This could be aggravated when governments planning to undertake unpopular measures that will increase revenues and/or reduce public expenditures face political backlash that render them not politically feasible.


And kindly emphasize this:

Major Risks of Debt Crisis

1. High external debts are believed to have harmful effects to the economy.
2. The reputation of a country is also at stake when external debt is looked at and may discourage investments to enter into the country.
3. The present foreign investors in the country would be expected to pull capital out of the country.
4. Decline in the value of Peso, making the debt burden (which is largely denominated in dollars) more onerous.
 

Attachments

  • Philippines Total Gross External Debt   1981 2016   Data   Chart   Calendar.jpeg
    Philippines Total Gross External Debt 1981 2016 Data Chart Calendar.jpeg
    91.8 KB · Views: 6
  • Philippines Inflation Rate   1958 2016   Data   Chart   Calendar   Forecast.jpeg
    Philippines Inflation Rate 1958 2016 Data Chart Calendar Forecast.jpeg
    153.6 KB · Views: 4
Last edited:
^ Thank you.

Anyone else can come forward and add other important details. I haven't really finished on the long-term, medium-term, and short-term maturity aspect of debts as also important considerations when analyzing such data—as long-term maturity debts also give a nation more flexibility in handling its payment schedules. I welcome anyone to enrich this thread for the benefit of everybody. Atin lahat to, sinimulan ko lang.

Anyone could also suggest a closely related topic for inclusion. For example, the current emergence of BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) might soon play a greater role in the global world of finance, offering a true alternative to the IMF-WB banking hegemony.
 
Last edited:
Sa panahon ba ni D. Macapagal at F. Marcos saan pumunta yung mga inutang natin? wala kasi akong nakitang info sa google

At sa panahon ni F.Marcos anong pinaka malaking sector yung ginamitan nya nang malaking pondo? Meron kasi nagsabi na nagkaroon nang spending spree si Emelda Marcos at nagpatayo nang mga ospital at iba pang mga government buildings pati narin yung funding sa film at arts industries malaki din daw pondo. So umutang lang daw tayo pero wala daw tlgang malaking investment ginawa para pambayad sa utang natin. Narinig ko lang sa barbero d2. :rofl:
 
Sa panahon ba ni D. Macapagal at F. Marcos saan pumunta yung mga inutang natin? wala kasi akong nakitang info sa google

At sa panahon ni F.Marcos anong pinaka malaking sector yung ginamitan nya nang malaking pondo? Meron kasi nagsabi na nagkaroon nang spending spree si Emelda Marcos at nagpatayo nang mga ospital at iba pang mga government buildings pati narin yung funding sa film at arts industries malaki din daw pondo. So umutang lang daw tayo pero wala daw tlgang malaking investment ginawa para pambayad sa utang natin. Narinig ko lang sa barbero d2. :rofl:

Si Kaito baka may informatics sa mga yan binanggit mo. Yung kay D30 parang wala akong nakitang thrust sa pagpapa-igi ng quality ng education satin. Para sakin kasama dapat to anumang policy shift ng kahit anong gobyerno. Kay Marcos alam ko may mga tinulungan na scholars pinagdalubhasa pa sa mga Western universities. Ang naging problema ata wala naman silang nakitang pupuntahan sa Pinas pagkatapos nilang mag-aral. Kulang sa provision ang program. Dapat pag-aralin mo pondohan mo na rin magset-up ng companies and R & D institutions para may kinahinatnan yung kaalaman nila. Gaya ng ginawa ng South Korea, Taiwan, kahit Japan. Reverse technology ang naging puhunan nila. Yung Sony nagsimula sa pagbaklas ng mga American radios and TVs, benta sa local market nila at sinuportahan naman ng mga Hapon. Nung nakaipon na ng malaki nagtayo ng sarili nilang world-class na R & D para mainnovate yung product line nila. Parang ginawa lang din ng Samsung nung una.
 
Si Kaito baka may informatics sa mga yan binanggit mo. Yung kay D30 parang wala akong nakitang thrust sa pagpapa-igi ng quality ng education satin. Para sakin kasama dapat to anumang policy shift ng kahit anong gobyerno. Kay Marcos alam ko may mga tinulungan na scholars pinagdalubhasa pa sa mga Western universities. Ang naging problema ata wala naman silang nakitang pupuntahan sa Pinas pagkatapos nilang mag-aral. Kulang sa provision ang program. Dapat pag-aralin mo pondohan mo na rin magset-up ng companies and R & D institutions para may kinahinatnan yung kaalaman nila. Gaya ng ginawa ng South Korea, Taiwan, kahit Japan. Reverse technology ang naging puhunan nila. Yung Sony nagsimula sa pagbaklas ng mga American radios and TVs, benta sa local market nila at sinuportahan naman ng mga Hapon. Nung nakaipon na ng malaki nagtayo ng sarili nilang world-class na R & D para mainnovate yung product line nila. Parang ginawa lang din ng Samsung nung una.

Thrust sa education si D30? Talagang wala. Kasi ang naririnig ko sa Dabaw, may scholarship daw bininibigay yong City Hall pero ang taas ng qualifications. Dapat 90 above yong GWA mo para makapasok ka, tapos dapat may pirma pa daw galing sa mga 'core' leaders ng baranggay na kaalyado nila. Ang narinig ko, na ang nagbibigay ng scholarship doon na hindi mataas ang qualifications basta interesado ka lang mag-aral ay yong kay Congressman Nograles, at halos lahat ata ng mga istudyante doon sa kanilang State University ay halos scholar niya.

Yong kay Marcos naman, tama may pinondohan nga siya para sa mga scholarship, si Iqbal ng MILF ay grantee noon. Tama ka, ang problema ay yong mga scholars hindi na bumalik sa ating bansa, di na nag return service. Tapos yong mga scholarships ay halos naka sentro lang sa UP, tapos palakasan pa para makakuha.

OO dapat palawigin yong R&D, yan ang wala sa atin at yan din ang hindi ko nakikita kay D30, kaya palpak pa rin. Ang US armed forces ay hindi naging dependent sa kanilang government budget pero, sila rin ay nag income generation kasi nagbebenta sila ng mga armas at ekipo. Sa atin, ang Armed Forces ay nakatuon lang sa sports at volleyball ang development kaya wala income. Dapat kay D30 hindi siya bili ng bili ng mga military hardware o vessels na maramihan na yong ibang bansa lang ang kumikita. Bili lang dapat siya ng 2 o 3, din tayo na ang gagawa para magparami. Pede natin i apply yong 'reverse engineering' para di sabihin na nangongopya tayo at para ma enhance pa. Dami pang mga trabaho ang ma create nyan, masasabi pa nating gawang Pinoy at saka uunlad pa ang karunungan.

Alam nyo, na inspire nga ako two weeks ago, kasi may pinoy na dating nangibang bansa at bumalik dito at gumawa ng electric car, ito yong link http://www.unbox.ph/wheels/the-genius-ev-an-electric-car-built-by-a-filipino-engineer/ pero ang problema ay nilalait yata at sinabi pa ng isang gabinite ngayon na mas maganda pa daw yong mga electric cars at bus na gawa ng China kasi daw mura at kumpleto na. Nakakainis, daming pasaway, kaya di tayo talaga uunlad.
 
Thrust sa education si D30? Talagang wala. Kasi ang naririnig ko sa Dabaw, may scholarship daw bininibigay yong City Hall pero ang taas ng qualifications. Dapat 90 above yong GWA mo para makapasok ka, tapos dapat may pirma pa daw galing sa mga 'core' leaders ng baranggay na kaalyado nila. Ang narinig ko, na ang nagbibigay ng scholarship doon na hindi mataas ang qualifications basta interesado ka lang mag-aral ay yong kay Congressman Nograles, at halos lahat ata ng mga istudyante doon sa kanilang State University ay halos scholar niya.

Yong kay Marcos naman, tama may pinondohan nga siya para sa mga scholarship, si Iqbal ng MILF ay grantee noon. Tama ka, ang problema ay yong mga scholars hindi na bumalik sa ating bansa, di na nag return service. Tapos yong mga scholarships ay halos naka sentro lang sa UP, tapos palakasan pa para makakuha.

OO dapat palawigin yong R&D, yan ang wala sa atin at yan din ang hindi ko nakikita kay D30, kaya palpak pa rin. Ang US armed forces ay hindi naging dependent sa kanilang government budget pero, sila rin ay nag income generation kasi nagbebenta sila ng mga armas at ekipo. Sa atin, ang Armed Forces ay nakatuon lang sa sports at volleyball ang development kaya wala income. Dapat kay D30 hindi siya bili ng bili ng mga military hardware o vessels na maramihan na yong ibang bansa lang ang kumikita. Bili lang dapat siya ng 2 o 3, din tayo na ang gagawa para magparami. Pede natin i apply yong 'reverse engineering' para di sabihin na nangongopya tayo at para ma enhance pa. Dami pang mga trabaho ang ma create nyan, masasabi pa nating gawang Pinoy at saka uunlad pa ang karunungan.

Alam nyo, na inspire nga ako two weeks ago, kasi may pinoy na dating nangibang bansa at bumalik dito at gumawa ng electric car, ito yong link http://www.unbox.ph/wheels/the-genius-ev-an-electric-car-built-by-a-filipino-engineer/ pero ang problema ay nilalait yata at sinabi pa ng isang gabinite ngayon na mas maganda pa daw yong mga electric cars at bus na gawa ng China kasi daw mura at kumpleto na. Nakakainis, daming pasaway, kaya di tayo talaga uunlad.

Di talaga uubra kung ang national education thrust mo patchy. Di dapat sa LGUs lang, dapat gawing national at uniform ang standards. Isa pa, iprioritize dapat ang sciences, pati yung specific targets along product lines and extensive industry and R & D tie-ups. Sa Iran nagulat ako isa sa nangunguna na pala sa nanotechnology, at ngayon andami niya tie-ups sa mga leading nanotech all over the world. Sino mag-iiexpect na isang fundamental Muslim country makakaisip ng ganyan, even if Iran in ancient time was a leading proponent of World civilization?

SA mga local inventors naman, cguro ang kailangan nila awareness sa alternative funding platforms. Mahirap umasa sa gobyerno. Ang uso ngayon crowdfunding, bakit di nila subukan yun. Actually di lang sa inventors to, anyone with a bright idea, like a trendy film, can go there. Yung pinsan kong filmmaker is trying to do that after one of his friends did.
 
Last edited:
External Debt Highest to Lowest by Country
View attachment 292196
View attachment 292197
View attachment 292198
Philippines: Rank 57
Full Chart


Countries Scaled to the Unsustainability of their Debt
Note: Countries not Included out of Immediate Danger and Are in Good Shape at Time of Survey

View attachment 292200

The basic idea of this ratio is that a bigger, richer country can probably afford to borrow more money than a smaller, poorer one. So rather than saying Jamaica is in good shape because it has such little debt but Brazil is a disaster, we see that Jamaica actually has a lot of debt relative to the size of its small economy, while Brazil has been quite frugal given its overall size and prosperity.

Note, too, that some of these countries—the United States, Japan, the UK—owe money that is denominated in their own currency. The Japanese state isn't going to run out of yen no matter what happens, and given Japanese inflation trends over the past 20 years that country not going to find it problematic to print a bunch of yen if that's what needs to be done.

A country with a lot of foreign currency debts (looking at you again, Jamaica) has a much more tenuous position that is much more analogous to a heavily indebted family or business.

Then there's the middle-ground case of the eurozone countries. Greece, Italy, Portugal, etc. don't issue their own currency, but they also don't borrow money in someone else's currency. The eurozone could, collectively, manage these debts fairly easily. But thus far it hasn't wanted to, which makes eurozone debt riskier than it needs to be.


Linawin ko lang ulit: kaya wala ang Pilipinas sa Figure 2 ay dahil we have been doing well in the past decade or so managing our foreign external debts. Para malinawin din kayo sa dynamics ng foreign debt, read the link below. Di lang ang absolute value ng laki ng utang ang mahalaga, kundi yung ibang economic factors pa. Of course it doesn't mean na dapat maging pabaya at careless na tayo sa paghandle ng foreign debt. If anything, we should be more careful now and study other options, gaya nga ng alternative na binibigay ng BRICS.

FOR MORE JUMP HERE
 

Attachments

  • external_debt_countries01.PNG
    external_debt_countries01.PNG
    89.2 KB · Views: 15
  • external_debt_countries02.PNG
    external_debt_countries02.PNG
    89.5 KB · Views: 14
  • external_debt_countries03.PNG
    external_debt_countries03.PNG
    88.1 KB · Views: 14
  • Countries Scaled to the Unsustainability of their Debt.png
    Countries Scaled to the Unsustainability of their Debt.png
    86.3 KB · Views: 11
Last edited:
Si Kaito baka may informatics sa mga yan binanggit mo. Yung kay D30 parang wala akong nakitang thrust sa pagpapa-igi ng quality ng education satin. Para sakin kasama dapat to anumang policy shift ng kahit anong gobyerno. Kay Marcos alam ko may mga tinulungan na scholars pinagdalubhasa pa sa mga Western universities. Ang naging problema ata wala naman silang nakitang pupuntahan sa Pinas pagkatapos nilang mag-aral. Kulang sa provision ang program. Dapat pag-aralin mo pondohan mo na rin magset-up ng companies and R & D institutions para may kinahinatnan yung kaalaman nila. Gaya ng ginawa ng South Korea, Taiwan, kahit Japan. Reverse technology ang naging puhunan nila. Yung Sony nagsimula sa pagbaklas ng mga American radios and TVs, benta sa local market nila at sinuportahan naman ng mga Hapon. Nung nakaipon na ng malaki nagtayo ng sarili nilang world-class na R & D para mainnovate yung product line nila. Parang ginawa lang din ng Samsung nung una.

Kakabalik ko lang galing bakasyon. Medyo yung isip ko nasa bakasyon parin. Mag share ako later. :)

- - - Updated - - -

Sa panahon ba ni D. Macapagal at F. Marcos saan pumunta yung mga inutang natin? wala kasi akong nakitang info sa google

At sa panahon ni F.Marcos anong pinaka malaking sector yung ginamitan nya nang malaking pondo? Meron kasi nagsabi na nagkaroon nang spending spree si Emelda Marcos at nagpatayo nang mga ospital at iba pang mga government buildings pati narin yung funding sa film at arts industries malaki din daw pondo. So umutang lang daw tayo pero wala daw tlgang malaking investment ginawa para pambayad sa utang natin. Narinig ko lang sa barbero d2. :rofl:

Sa panahon ni Macapagal, based sa mga articles na nabasa ko, wala naman siyang malaking pinaggamitang pondo para sa isang malaking projects bukod sa land reform law. Yun lang kasi yung sikat na proyekto nya. Kumpara kay Marcos. Isa na dyan yung Manila International Airport, Biomass, Biogas, Nuclear, Hydro, Dendrothermal, Geothermal, Coal, Electric Power Plant, roads, bridges, hospitals, schools, LRT1, Maharlika highway, NLEX, SLEX, etc. Tama nagfocus din si Marcos sa Arts and Theatres gaya ng PICC, Folk Arts, CCP, Film Threater, etc. Isa pa dyan sa siguradong malaking pinondohan ay yung Santa Barbara Project. Yan yung malaking effort at pondo ang nasayang dahil pinahinto yan ni Cory nung siya na ang presidente dahil pwede daw mag lead yan sa pag develop ng nuclear weapons. Kaya ngayon pinagtatawanan at binubully na lang tayo ng China dahil wala tayong pang depensa. Hehe.
 
Last edited:
To Borrow or Not to Borrow: The Tricky Affair of Foreign Reserves and National Government External Debt​

If you come to think of it, money matters, as far as countries and international economics is concerned, is a funny—or nasty—affair. Here's an example: a country would stockpile some vast amount of US dollars, euros, or yen, all to safeguard itself against various financial shocks like the Asian Financial Crisis of old, all the while foregoing the chance to use those monies to finance the building of domestic infrastructures and other local activities to stimulate its local economy; meanwhile those monies are stashed away in some other foreign banks, and those banks would then lend the money to spur their own economies. In short, we are financing other nations' economic activities, usually at lower interest rates, while we stay away from using those same monies for our own good.

Not only that:
we also now find ourselves borrowing from outside external creditors to start or complete national projects.

All of these illustrate the tricky decisions a country must make regarding its financial position relative to the other countries of the world. To some degree, however, financial experts are able to make good decisions, built from the critical experiences of the past.


View attachment 292462
View attachment 292463
Foreign Exchange Reserves by Countries, Highest to Lowest
Philippines 26th: Rating: Very Good to Excellent

Complete chart

Public Debt vs External Debt
Don't confuse public debt with external debt.

That's the amount owed to foreign investors by both the government and the private sector. Public debt affects external debt, because if interest rates go up on the public debt, they will also rise for all private debt. That's one reason businesses pressure their governments to keep public debt within a reasonable range. (Source: CIA World Factbook Glossary Public Debt)

When Public Debt Is Good

In the short run, public debt is a good way for countries to get extra funds to invest in their economic growth. Public debt is a safe way for foreigners to invest in a country's growth by buying government bonds.

This is much safer than foreign direct investment. That's when foreigners purchase at least a 10% interest in the country's companies, businesses or real estate. It's also less risky than investing in the country's public companies via its stock market. Public debt is attractive to risk-averse investors since it is backed by the government itself.

When used correctly, public debt improves the standard of living in a country.

That's because it allows the government to build new roads and bridges, improve education and job training, and provide pensions. This spurs citizens to spend more now instead of instead of saving for retirement, further boosting economic growth.

When Public Debt Is Bad
Governments tend to take on too much debt because the benefits make them popular with voters. Therefore, investors usually measure the level of risk by comparing debt to a country's total economic output, known as Gross Domestic Product (GDP). The debt-to-GDP ratio gives an indication of how likely the country can pay off its debt. Investors usually don't become concerned until the debt-to-GDP ratio reaches a critical level.

When it appears the debt is approaching a critical level, investors usually start demanding a higher interest rate. They want more return for the higher risk. If the country keeps spending, then its bonds may receive a lower S&P (Standard & Poor, the international financial risk watchdog) rating. This indicates how likely it is the country will default on its debt.

As interest rates rise, it becomes more expensive for a country to refinance its existing debt. In time, more income has to go toward debt repayment, and less toward government services.

In the long run, public debt that's too large can act like driving with the emergency brake on. Investors drive up interest rates, which makes the components of economic expansion (housing, business growth, and auto loans) more expensive. To avoid this burden, governments must be careful to find that sweet spot of public debt. That's large enough to drive economic growth, but small enough to keep interest rates low.

Here's an interesting assessment about the status of the Philippines in the matter of debt management:

.​
This is good, of course, but it is also not a license to mindlessly accumulate external debts for no good reason at all. The lesson, then, is for Filipinos to be vigilant with government handling external debts: able to give credit where it's due, but more importantly able to raise the red flags when approaching dangerous levels not justified by the economic health of the nation.
 

Attachments

  • 161204A.PNG
    161204A.PNG
    71.6 KB · Views: 3
  • 161204B.PNG
    161204B.PNG
    76.7 KB · Views: 5
Last edited:
Ph is global leader in financial inclusion

In the newly released Global Microscope on the Enabling Environment for Financial Inclusion, the Philippines is once again named as one of the global leaders.

The Report ranks the Philippines third in the world, tied with India, in terms of having a conducive environment for financial inclusion. The Philippines and India ranked highest among 10 Asian countries. Colombia and Peru tied for the number one spot.

According to the 2016 report, Colombia, Peru, India and the Philippines are the four strong leaders having performed consistently well across all indicators considered in the study.

These include government support for financial inclusion; regulatory and supervisory capacity; regulations on credit, deposit, microinsurance, and branches and agents; requirements for non-regulated lenders; electronic payments; and existence of credit reporting systems, market conduct rules, and dispute resolution mechanisms for financial consumers. In particular, the four leaders stood out from the rest of the countries in terms of regulation of insurance for low income population, digital financial services, and consumer protection.

The report recognized positive changes in the financial inclusion landscape of the Philippines since 2015. These include the signing into law of Republic Act No. 10693 or the Microfinance NGOs Act which aims to strengthen non-government organizations engaged in microfinance operations for the poor, and Republic Act No. 10846 which amends the Charter of the Philippine Deposit Insurance Corporation to strengthen its institutional and governance framework.

source
 
TS, paki update itong thread mo. Maganda yong discussion mo dito. Ano kaya yong analysis mo ngayong ipinapatupad at ipapatupad na ang mga tax reforms (TRAIN 1-5). Tayo ngayon ay may 5.7% inflation rate at may babayarin pa na panibagong utang galeng ng China na pagkalaki laki. Tapos yong consumer protection ay parang di na naipapatupad kasi nga yong DTI ay walang kontrol para magtakda ng price ceiling. Ano ba yong projection mo for the next 5 years?
 
Contained na yong inflation sa 3% for this year.
Yong TRAIN itutuloy na para mapondohan yong mga proyekto at Universal health care ng mga Pilipino.
Patuloy pa rin ang Build Build program ni Tatay Digong.
Syempre matutupad na rin yong mga increases na inaaasam ng mga kawani ng gobyerno.
Maganda mangyayari sa Pilipinas magiging progresibo tayo.
Pati environment mapapangalagaan rin.
Dami trabaho ngayong taon aabot sa 2 milyon jobs.
Thanks to Tatay Digong ang bayani ng bayan.
 
Back
Top Bottom