- Messages
- 622
- Reaction score
- 0
- Points
- 26
kung hinahanap mo word na inbreeding at birth defects ay di talaga makikita sa bible yun but the word incest simply testifies the defects of the child when it is born because of inbreeding. analytically speaking, as what pcruz stated, by observance the ancient people knew it pretty well what incest means and that is birth defects.
As I see it, as a bible nut, you went outside your boundaries for that argument.
Everything is in the bible as you christians say. Incest, in the bible, was forbidden ONLY for sanctity reasons and there was no verse that can be presented that links birth defects in inbreeding in ANY way. No one being able to present a single verse (even cherry picked ones) to prove otherwise is more than enough evidence for it.
A bible nut stating an argument that is outside the only reference material they only need (or so they claim). So basically, that was only based on your own presumptions. If not please feel free to state some evidences.
Using analysis, an argument like what you said may have been feasible. But if the analysis goes outside the boundaries of what you stand for (the bible), that makes your argument invalid.
My point still stands. The bible has only forbidden incest ONLY due to sanctity reasons and NOT in ANY WAY due to birth defects potentially caused by inbreeding.