Symbianize Forum

Most of our features and services are available only to members, so we encourage you to login or register a new account. Registration is free, fast and simple. You only need to provide a valid email. Being a member you'll gain access to all member forums and features, post a message to ask question or provide answer, and share or find resources related to mobile phones, tablets, computers, game consoles, and multimedia.

All that and more, so what are you waiting for, click the register button and join us now! Ito ang website na ginawa ng pinoy para sa pinoy!

Totoo ba na may Diyos? Nag-eexist ba siya talaga?

Status
Not open for further replies.
Simple lang ang sagot jan , OO totoo na may Diyos Totoo na nag Exist siya , nagbabasa ka ng bible pero may pagdududa kapa din sa isip mo .? hindi mo ba alam na halos lahat ng nasa bibliya ay napapatunayan na ng science .? about sa noah arc , kay moses at kung ano ano pa ? sa book of revelation halos lahat ng signs isa isa ng lumalabas , puro lindol ,bagyo at kung ano ano sakuna , at higit sa lahat ang paglaganap ng tinatawag na anti christ.

Kapatid sa pagbabasa ng bibliya wag lang mata mo ang buksan mo kundi buksan mo din ang puso mo para tanggapin ang katotohanan na totoo ang Diyos ,. subukan mo manalangin sa kanya tol ,dahil lahat ng kumakatok pinagbubuksan lahat ng naghahanap ay nakakakita, hindi madamot ang Diyos tol at gusto na yang ginagawa mo ang nananaliksik ka about sa kanya . Search mo sa internet lahat ng sinabi ko tol makikita mo lahat ng nakasulat sa bibliya ay totoo, Sana nakatulong ako sa kaguluhan ng pag iisip mo tol and i pray na sana malaman mo na yung sagot sa katanungan mo , sa katunayan nga yung sagot sa tanong mo ay nasagot na nasayo nalang yung choice kung paniniwalaan mo .

????

The Ark: Could Noah's Tale Be True?

The new film "Noah" stars Russell Crowe as the man chosen by God to collect pairs of Earth's animals on a massive ark to save them from a global flood. The film, which opened March 28, is sizing up to be a Biblical blockbuster, replete with star power and stunning special effects. But how realistic is it?

While many people consider the story of Noah's Ark merely an instructive myth or parable about God's punishment for man's wickedness, others believe that the story is historically accurate. To them, Noah's tale describes events that really happened only a few thousand years ago.

A plausible ark?

Henry Morris, author of "The Biblical Basis for Modern Science" (Baker House, 1984), a creationist text, states that "The ark was to be essentially a huge box designed essentially for stability in the waters of the Flood rather than for movement through the waters. ... The ark was taller than a normal three-story building and about one and a half times as long as a football field. The total volumetric capacity was equal to 1,396,000 cubic feet [39,500 cubic meters] ... equivalent to 522 standard railroad stock cars, far more than enough space to carry two of every known kind of animal, living or extinct." [Wipeout: History's Most Mysterious Extinctions]

The flaws in Morris's calculations become evident when you consider that, according to many creationists, Noah's Ark included hundreds of dinosaurs. That would mean, for example, the brachiosaurus (two of them, of course), each of which weighed about 50 tons and reached 85 feet (26 meters) long. Even if two representatives all of Earth's animals could somehow fit on the ark, enough space would be needed for drinking water and food for an entire year.

Furthermore, contrary to many depictions of the ark, God actually asked Noah to collect not one but seven pairs of "clean" animals and one pair of "unclean" animals (Genesis 7:2-3) — resulting, in some cases, in fourteen of many animals. There simply would not be nearly enough space for all of them.

There's also the problem of collecting all those animals in the first place, anthropology professor Ken Feder notes in his book "The Encyclopedia of Dubious Archaeology" (Greenwood, 2010).

"How would koala bears from Australia, llamas from South America and penguins from Antarctica have managed the trip to the ark's location in the Middle East?" Feder writes. "And how would their human caretakers have looked after this vast menagerie of animals? Noah, his wife, and his three sons and their wives (that's only eight people) providing food and water to the animals would have been an impossible task. What (or who) would the carnivores, living in close quarters with all those delicious herbivores, have eaten?"

Since the ark's purpose was merely to float (and not necessarily go anywhere), it would have had no means of propulsion (such as a sail) or even steering. According to Morris, "As far as navigation was concerned, God Himself evidently steered the ship, keeping its occupants reasonably comfortable inside while the storms and waves raged outside." [History's 10 Most Overlooked Mysteries]

Of course, this rather begs the question, because if God created the global flood and divinely steered the ark, then presumably He could have done any other miracle to assure the success of Noah's mission, from temporarily shrinking all the animals to the size of rats or even allowing them all to live for a year without food or water. Once a supernatural miracle is invoked to explain one thing, it can be used to explain everything.

A closer look

Another problem with the Ark story arises becausethere is no evidence for a global flood. Creation stories from many different religions and cultures include flood stories, and Feder notes that if a worldwide flood had occurred, "The archaeological record of 5,000 years ago would be replete with Pompeii-style ruins — the remains of thousands of towns, villages and cities, all wiped out by flood waters, simultaneously. ... It would appear that the near annihilation of the human race, if it happened, left no imprint on the archaeological record anywhere."

The lack of physical evidence of the great flood hasn't stopped modern believers from searching for Noah's Ark itself. But the boat is conspicuously missing. It has never been found despite repeated claims to the contrary. Forty years ago, Violet M. Cummings, author of "Noah's Ark: Fable or Fact?" (Creation-Science Research Center, 1973) claimed that the Ark had been found on Mount Ararat in Turkey, exactly as described in Genesis 8:4, which states, "and on the 17th day of the seventh month the ark came to rest on the mountains of Ararat."

In February 1993, CBS aired a two-hour primetime special titled, "The Incredible Discovery of Noah's Ark." It included the riveting testimony of a man who claimed not only to have personally seen the Ark on Ararat, but also to have recovered a piece of it. The claims were later revealed to be a hoax. In March 2006, researchers found a rock formation on Mount Ararat that resembled a huge ark, but nothing came of that claim.

A few months later, a team of archaeologists from a Christian organization found yet another rock formation that might be Noah's Ark — not on Mt. Ararat but instead in the Elburz Mountains of Iran. That sensational discovery fizzled out, too. In 2012, "Baywatch" actress Donna D'Errico was injured on Mount Ararat while on a quest to find Noah's Ark. She said she had been inspired to search for the Ark ever since she saw a movie about it as a child.

The fact that Noah's Ark has been "discovered" so many times yet remains lost is something of a mystery in itself. Whether "Noah" floats or sinks at the box office this weekend, it notably doesn't include the tagline "Based on a true story."

Benjamin Radford is deputy editor of "Skeptical Inquirer" science magazine and author of six books including "The Martians Have Landed! A History of Media Panics and Hoaxes" (McFarland, 2011). His website is www.BenjaminRadford.com.

source: https://www.livescience.com/44442-noahs-ark-true.html

- - - Updated - - -

sa mga MASIPAG magbasa at MAGSALIKSIK hindi yung nakikinig lang sa sinasabi ng iba , ,

eto pa === http://www.patheos.com/blogs/freethoughtnow/can-it-be-stated-enough-why-the-noahs-ark-myth-doesnt-hold-water/
 
Simple lang ang sagot jan , OO totoo na may Diyos Totoo na nag Exist siya

diyos ng anong religion? si ahura mazda ba ng zoroastrianism na pinagkopyahan ng christianity? o ang pagan gods na pinagkopyahan din ng NT authors? bakit mas totoo yung nangopya lang?


nagbabasa ka ng bible pero may pagdududa kapa din sa isip mo .? hindi mo ba alam na halos lahat ng nasa bibliya ay napapatunayan na ng science .? about sa noah arc ,

noah's flood is another copycat story from babylonian myth. bilical writers adopted this story after their return from exile and invented judaism with the belief in one god (which they also copied from persian religion zoroastrianism na pioneer ng belief in one god ahura mazda who also freed them from babylonia led by their king cyrus the great kaya nga pati si cyrus ginawa nilang messiah sa bible)


kay moses at kung ano ano pa ?

the torah or the first 5 books of the hebrew bible was written by 4 sources: J,E,P and D sources.. walang t@ngang bible scholar ang nagsabing si moses ang nagsulat


sa book of revelation halos lahat ng signs isa isa ng lumalabas , puro lindol ,bagyo at kung ano ano sakuna , at higit sa lahat ang paglaganap ng tinatawag na anti christ.


ang book of revelation ay sinulat using the ancient literary technique na vaticinium ex eventu, meaning tapos na yun gmga events na tinutukoy at sinulat in the form of prophecy para kunwari natupad.. ang revelation ay sinulat after the jewish revolt at the end of the reign of nero (ang 666 ay gematria applied to nero's name in greek).. wala pang tao panahon pa ng dinosaurs magpahanggang ngayon meron nang lindol bagyo at sakuna


Kapatid sa pagbabasa ng bibliya wag lang mata mo ang buksan mo kundi buksan mo din ang puso mo para tanggapin ang katotohanan na totoo ang Diyos ,. subukan mo manalangin sa kanya tol ,dahil lahat ng kumakatok pinagbubuksan lahat ng naghahanap ay nakakakita, hindi madamot ang Diyos tol at gusto na yang ginagawa mo ang nananaliksik ka about sa kanya . Search mo sa internet lahat ng sinabi ko tol makikita mo lahat ng nakasulat sa bibliya ay totoo, Sana nakatulong ako sa kaguluhan ng pag iisip mo tol and i pray na sana malaman mo na yung sagot sa katanungan mo , sa katunayan nga yung sagot sa tanong mo ay nasagot na nasayo nalang yung choice kung paniniwalaan mo .

mag reasearch ka.. basahin mo libro ng mga biblical scholars at hindi mga pastor lang ng mga religion..

eto pinaka the best na docu about how the bible stories were invented:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qalTJzk4kO0&t=29s
 
Last edited:
Bakit sabi ni Archangel Michael sa napanuod kong anime eh wala ng Diyos? Sistema na lang daw ang naiwan. Baka totoo yun? :noidea:
 
Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind. - Albert Einstein
 
Ah ito naman pala eh, mas rational ang pag-iisip mo at reasonable ka kapag ganito ang paniniwala mo. Naku mas maniniwala ako sa CHANCE kesa sa may intelligent design.
View attachment 325180
 

Attachments

  • Believe it or not.jpg
    Believe it or not.jpg
    364.6 KB · Views: 3
Ang dabest dyan sir is to pray and ask the Lord to guide you kung paano mo ma prove na may Diyos. Kung sa'yong puso na gusto mo talagang ma prove na may Diyos. Kasi pag nagbabasa kalang ng Bible at walang mag guide sa'yo useless, kasi di mo maiintindihan. So kailangan mo ng tao na mag guide sa'yo, pray ka lang na Lord guide me na matuklasan ko ang tao na mag guide sa akin tungo sa kaalaman tungkol sa Diyos at makaintindi ka sa lahat ng nakasulat sa Bible. Kasi walang Religion na maka save sa atin. Kahit anong Religion hindi 'yan maka save sa atin. Ako wala akong Religion. God hate Religion.
 
Ang dabest dyan sir is to pray and ask the Lord to guide you kung paano mo ma prove na may Diyos. Kung sa'yong puso na gusto mo talagang ma prove na may Diyos. Kasi pag nagbabasa kalang ng Bible at walang mag guide sa'yo useless, kasi di mo maiintindihan. So kailangan mo ng tao na mag guide sa'yo, pray ka lang na Lord guide me na matuklasan ko ang tao na mag guide sa akin tungo sa kaalaman tungkol sa Diyos at makaintindi ka sa lahat ng nakasulat sa Bible. Kasi walang Religion na maka save sa atin. Kahit anong Religion hindi 'yan maka save sa atin. Ako wala akong Religion. God hate Religion.

Tol parang nakakalito ka, "God hate religion" ? may sinabi ba ang bible about sa sinabi mo. Kasi ang diyos nga ang nagtatag ng pananampalataya edi syempre religion yun. At ito pa kung may limang daang paniniwala at isama narin natin ang parang nagrerebelding atheista dyan, dapat isa lang ang totoo. Malay nyo totoo pala ang mga atheista, edi hindi kana kakabahan i-abort ang bata at pwede na ang same sex marriage (tibay nang sikmura), ayos diba, .
 
Wala pang masyadong discoveries ang Science may sagot na agad ang Bible at ang nakakamangha pa dyan yung natutuklasan ngayon pa lang sinabi na ng Bible :) :)
 
...
ang book of revelation ay sinulat using the ancient literary technique na vaticinium ex eventu, meaning tapos na yun mga events na tinutukoy at sinulat in the form of prophecy para kunwari natupad.. ang revelation ay sinulat after the jewish revolt at the end of the reign of nero (ang 666 ay gematria applied to nero's name in greek).. wala pang tao panahon pa ng dinosaurs magpahanggang ngayon meron nang lindol bagyo at sakuna

eto pinaka the best na docu about how the bible stories were invented:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qalTJzk4kO0&t=29s

ganun po pala ang pagkakasulat sa book of revelation ;)
ang haba po ng documentary sa link mo po koya halos 2hours pero napaka-imformative naman, ;)
 
Last edited:
Isipin nyo may dalawang dimension ng kalawakan ang isa may dios na lumikha (kakayahang hindi mauunawaan ng tao at hindi makukumpara ang talino) at siya'y may kontrol sa buhay ng tao, pwedeng magbigay ng walang hanggang buhay para lang sa mga mabubuting tao, may desisyon kung anong mangyayari sa kalawakan at mas tinataguyud ang magandang gawain at may pantay na kondisyon sa maling gawa.
Tapos dito naman ang dimensyon ng mga athiesta kung saan ang kalawakan ay galing sa matter at nanggaling din ang buhay nila sa matter (kasi dapat hindi pwedeng mapunta ang conclusion nila sa may lumikha at ang pinaka huling pagpipilian nila ay ang materialismong pananaw) at nagtuloy tuloy sa proseso ng evolution dahil sa mahabang panahon, subalit hindi nila pwedeng tanggihin ang buhay nila ay nakadepende sa paligid nila, sabi ng mga scientist ang araw daw ay may hangganan din, paano kung inabutan nila ang ganong punto na pinagkukunan ng buhay nila ay mawawala na, kasi diba ang araw ay isang uri din ng bituin kapag malapit ng mamatay. Ito ay sasabog(walang katapat ang supernova, alam nyo naman yan), hindi pwedeng umilag ang planeta nyo, panigurado mapupugnaw yan, wag nyong sabihin pupunta kayo sa mars at anong mangyayari sa hustisya nyo kasi sigurado naman ang may karapatan lang diyan ay mga may pera at may impluwensya at napapaisip din ako kung hanggang saan aabot ang evolution nyo, ano ba next stage ng buhay nyo may madadag bang bagong physical features sa katawan nyo, may magbabago ba sa pagiisip nyo at sa morale nyo, sigurado ba kayo na ang ibang hayop ay magiging tao din. Pwede nyo ding isipin baka may iba pang katulad sa buhay natin parang alien ba?, ganun din siguro yan may pinagkukunan sila ng buhay at may limitasyon din ito para sa kanila. Tapos paulit ulit lang, pwede ding may big bang nanaman tapos darating ang panahon mamatay ang tao at darating ang conclusion mo na anong sense ng ganong buhay ?
Sa dalawang sitwasyong yan dapat isa diyan ay totoo, baka mapansin nyo parang sugarcoating ang halimbawa ko sa may Dios, pero yun ang matibay naming paniniwala. Sa opposite na pananaw ng atheista totoo naman ang sinabi ko kasi pwede parin silang mabuhay ng normal at masaya na walang dios, pipilitin nilang abutin ang hangganan ng science nila at wala namang masama dun kasi ang gusto nila ay katotohanan din. Hindi namin alam kung anong meron sa future nyo, wala namang tao may hawak sa kibukasan ngunit may mga bagay na magaganap na hindi maiiwasan. Isipin natin lagi kung anong hangganan ng buhay, tignan natin kung makabuluhan ba yon. Alam nyo sa sarili nyo isa lang dapat ang totoo dito at isa lang ang pagpipilian natin.
 
Last edited:
Isipin nyo may dalawang dimension ng kalawakan ang isa may dios na lumikha (kakayahang hindi mauunawaan ng tao at hindi makukumpara ang talino) at siya'y may kontrol sa buhay ng tao, pwedeng magbigay ng walang hanggang buhay para lang sa mga mabubuting tao, may desisyon kung anong mangyayari sa kalawakan at mas tinataguyud ang magandang gawain at may pantay na kondisyon sa maling gawa.
Tapos dito naman ang dimensyon ng mga athiesta kung saan ang kalawakan ay galing sa matter at nanggaling din ang buhay nila sa matter (kasi dapat hindi pwedeng mapunta ang conclusion nila sa may lumikha at ang pinaka huling pagpipilian nila ay ang materialismong pananaw) at nagtuloy tuloy sa proseso ng evolution dahil sa mahabang panahon, subalit hindi nila pwedeng tanggihin ang buhay nila ay nakadepende sa paligid nila, sabi ng mga scientist ang araw daw ay may hangganan din, paano kung inabutan nila ang ganong punto na pinagkukunan ng buhay nila ay mawawala na, kasi diba ang araw ay isang uri din ng bituin kapag malapit ng mamatay. Ito ay sasabog(walang katapat ang supernova, alam nyo naman yan), hindi pwedeng umilag ang planeta nyo, panigurado mapupugnaw yan, wag nyong sabihin pupunta kayo sa mars at anong mangyayari sa hustisya nyo kasi sigurado naman ang may karapatan lang diyan ay mga may pera at may impluwensya at napapaisip din ako kung hanggang saan aabot ang evolution nyo, ano ba next stage ng buhay nyo may madadag bang bagong physical features sa katawan nyo, may magbabago ba sa pagiisip nyo at sa morale nyo, sigurado ba kayo na ang ibang hayop ay magiging tao din. Pwede nyo ding isipin baka may iba pang katulad sa buhay natin parang alien ba?, ganun din siguro yan may pinagkukunan sila ng buhay at may limitasyon din ito para sa kanila. Tapos paulit ulit lang, pwede ding may big bang nanaman tapos darating ang panahon mamatay ang tao at darating ang conclusion mo na anong sense ng ganong buhay ?
Sa dalawang sitwasyong yan dapat isa diyan ay totoo, baka mapansin nyo parang sugarcoating ang halimbawa ko sa may Dios, pero yun ang matibay naming paniniwala. Sa opposite na pananaw ng atheista totoo naman ang sinabi ko kasi pwede parin silang mabuhay ng normal at masaya na walang dios, pipilitin nilang abutin ang hangganan ng science nila at wala namang masama dun kasi ang gusto nila ay katotohanan din. Hindi namin alam kung anong meron sa future nyo, wala namang tao may hawak sa kibukasan ngunit may mga bagay na magaganap na hindi maiiwasan. Isipin natin lagi kung anong hangganan ng buhay, tignan natin kung makabuluhan ba yon. Alam nyo sa sarili nyo isa lang dapat ang totoo dito, dalawa lang ang pagpipilian natin.

natawa ako dito :lol:

Hindi namin alam kung anong meron sa future nyo

bakit? sino ba nakaka alam ng future ng bawat isa ??
 
para po sa mga hindi naniniwala kay GOD pakibasa po ng story sa baba. nang maintindihan nyo ng mabuti ang lahat. Maraming salamat po.




An atheist professor of philosophy pauses before his class and then asks one of his new students to stand. 'You're a Christian, aren't you, son?'
'Yes sir,' the student says.

'So you believe in God?'

'Absolutely. '

'Is God good?'

'Sure! God's good.'

'Is God all-powerful? Can God do anything?'

'Yes'

'Are you good or evil?'

'The Bible says I'm evil.'

The professor grins knowingly. 'Aha! The Bible! He considers for a moment. 'Here's one for you. Let's say there's a sick person over here and you can cure him. You can do it. Would you help him? Would you try?'

'Yes sir, I would.'

'So you're good...!'

'I wouldn't say that.'

'But why not say that? You'd help a sick and maimed person if you could. Most of us would if we could. But God doesn't.'

The student does not answer, so the professor continues. 'He doesn't, does he? My brother was a Christian who died of cancer, even though he prayed to Jesus to heal him. How is this Jesus good? Can you answer that one?'

The student remains silent. 'No, you can't, can you?' the professor says. He takes a sip of water from a glass on his desk to give the student time to relax 'Let's start again, young fella. Is God good?'

'Er..yes,' the student says.

'Is Satan good?'

The student doesn't hesitate on this one. 'No.'

'Then where does Satan come from?'

The student falters. 'From God'

'That's right. God made Satan, didn't he? Tell me, son. Is there evil in this world?'

'Yes, sir..'

'Evil's everywhere, isn't it? And God did make everything, correct?'

'Yes'

'So who created evil?' The professor continued, 'If God created everything, then God created evil, since evil exists, and according to the principle that our works define who we are, then God is evil.'

Again, the student has no answer. 'Is there sickness? Immorality? Hatred? Ugliness? All these terrible things, do they exist in this world?'

The student squirms on his feet. 'Yes.'

'So who created them?'

The student does not answer again, so the professor repeats his question. 'Who created them?' There is still no answer. Suddenly the lecturer breaks away to pace in front of the classroom. The class is mesmerized. 'Tell me,' he continues onto another student. 'Do you believe in Jesus Christ, son?'
The student's voice betrays him and cracks. 'Yes, professor, I do.'

The old man stops pacing. 'Science says you have five senses you use to identify and observe the world around you. Have you ever seen Jesus?'

'No sir. I've never seen Him.'

'Then tell us if you've ever heard your Jesus?'

'No, sir, I have not..'

'Have you ever felt your Jesus, tasted your Jesus or smelt your Jesus? Have you ever had any sensory perception of Jesus Christ, or God for that matter?'

'No, sir, I'm afraid I haven't.'

'Yet you still believe in him?'

'Yes'

'According to the rules of empirical, testable, demonstrable protocol, science says your God doesn't exist... What do you say to that, son?'

'Nothing,' the student replies.. 'I only have my faith.'

'Yes, faith,' the professor repeats. 'And that is the problem science has with God. There is no evidence...only faith.'
The student stands quietly for a moment, before asking a question of His own. 'Professor, is there such thing as heat? '

'Yes.

'And is there such a thing as cold?'

'Yes, son, there's cold too.'

'No sir, there isn't.'

The professor turns to face the student, obviously interested. The room suddenly becomes very quiet. The student begins to explain. 'You can have lots of heat, even more heat, super-heat, mega-heat, unlimited heat, white heat, a little heat or no heat, but we don't have anything called 'cold'. We can hit d own to 458 degrees below zero, which is no heat, but we can't go any further after that. There is no such thing as cold; otherwise we would be able to go colder than the lowest -458 degrees. Every body or object is susceptible to study when it has or transmits energy, and heat is what makes a body or matter have or transmit energy. Absolute zero (-458 F) is the total absence of heat. You see, sir, 'cold' is only a word we use to describe the absence of heat. We cannot measure cold. Heat we can measure in thermal units because heat is energy. Cold is not the opposite of heat, sir, just the absence of it.'

Silence across the room. A pen drops somewhere in the classroom, sounding like a hammer.

'What about darkness, professor. Is there such a thing as darkness?'

'Yes,' the professor replies without hesitation.. 'What is night if it isn't darkness?'

'You're wrong again, sir. Darkness is not something; it is the absence of something. You can have low light, normal light, bright light, flashing light, but if you have no light constantly you have nothing and it's called darkness, isn't it? That's the meaning we use to define the word. In reality, darkness isn't. If it were, you would be able to make darkness darker, wouldn't you?'

The professor begins to smile at the student in front of him. This will be a good semester. 'So what point are you making, young man?'

'Yes, professor. My point is, your philosophical premise is flawed to start with, and so your conclusion must also be flawed.'

The professor's face cannot hide his surprise this time. 'Flawed? Can you explain how?'

'You are working on the premise of duality,' the student explains.. 'You argue that there is life and then there's death; a good God and a bad God. You are viewing the concept of God as something finite, something we can measure. Sir, science can't even explain a thought. It uses electricity and magnetism, but it has never seen, much less fully understood either one. To view death as the opposite of life is to be ignorant of the fact that death cannot exist as a substantive thing. Death is not the opposite of life, just the absence of it.'

'Now tell me, professor.. Do you teach your students that they evolved from a monkey?'

'If you are referring to the natural evolutionary process, young man, yes, of course I do.'

'Have you ever observed evolution with your own eyes, sir?'

The professor begins to shake his head, still smiling, as he realizes where the argument is going. A very good semester, indeed.

'Since no one has ever observed the process of evolution at work and cannot even prove that this process is an on-going endeavor, are you not teaching your opinion, sir? Are you now not a scientist, but a preacher?'

The class is in uproar. The student remains silent until the commotion has subsided. 'To continue the point you were making earlier to the other student, let me give you an example of what I mean.' The student looks around the room. 'Is there anyone in the class who has ever seen the professor's brain?' The class breaks out into laughter. 'Is there anyone here who has ever heard the professor's brain, felt the professor's brain, touched or smelt the professor's brain? No one appears to have done so. So, according to the established rules of empirical, stable, demonstrable protocol, science says that you have no brain, with all due respect, sir.' 'So if science says you have no brain, how can we trust your lectures, sir?'

Now the room is silent. The professor just stares at the student, his face unreadable. Finally, after what seems an eternity, the old man answers. 'I guess you'll have to take them on faith.'

'Now, you accept that there is faith, and, in fact, faith exists with life,' the student continues. 'Now, sir, is there such a thing as evil?' Now uncertain, the professor responds, 'Of course, there is. We see it every day. It is in the daily example of man's inhumanity to man. It is in the multitude of crime and violence everywhere in the world. These manifestations are nothing else but evil.'

To this the student replied, 'Evil does not exist sir, or at least it does not exist unto itself. Evil is simply the absence of God. It is just like darkness and cold, a word that man has created to describe the absence of God. God did not create evil Evil is the result of what happens when man does not have God's love present in his heart. It's like the cold that comes when there is no heat or the darkness that comes when there is no light.'

The professor sat down.



PS: the student was Albert Einstein
Albert Einstein wrote a book titled God vs. Science in 1921...

Where did the Devil come from?

God did not create the Devil. Instead, God created the angel who later became the Devil, also known as Satan. Jesus implied that at one time the Devil had been truthful and guiltless. Originally, then, the Devil was a righteous angelic son of God.—Read John 8:44.

How could an angel become the Devil?

The angel who became the Devil chose to oppose God and incited the first human pair to join him. He thus made himself Satan, which means “Resister.”—Read Genesis 3:1-5; Revelation 12:9.

Like the rest of God’s intelligent creatures, the angel that became the Devil had the freedom to choose between doing right and doing wrong, but he developed a desire to be worshipped. His desire for glory was stronger than his desire to please God.—Read Matthew 4:8, 9; James 1:13, 14.
 
natawa ako dito :lol:

Hindi namin alam kung anong meron sa future nyo

bakit? sino ba nakaka alam ng future ng bawat isa ??


O sige boss, wala naman talagang taong kayang manghula ng future, ang gusto kong malaman kahit assumption lang sa inyo, sa pananaw ba ng atheism saan aabot ang evolution kahit wild guess lang at anong goal nito ? Kasi kung nagsimula sa big bang tapos wala nang source of life, Edi wala na , siguro ganon ang ibig sabihin ng buhay, simple lang.
 
O sige boss, wala naman talagang taong kayang manghula ng future, ang gusto kong malaman kahit assumption lang sa inyo, sa pananaw ba ng atheism saan aabot ang evolution kahit wild guess lang at anong goal nito ? Kasi kung nagsimula sa big bang tapos wala nang source of life, Edi wala na , siguro ganon ang ibig sabihin ng buhay, simple lang.

Ang isang dapat tutukan ng tao ngayon ay ang gene editing and transhumanism, this last about integrating AI and the human body. Both give humans the chance to achieve immortality. Speculative? No. Andiyan na ang technologies, and there are powerful groups espousing—and most especially financing—these now.


So who will get to immortality first? Theists (kasama na Christians) na naghihintay ng reward ng mga diyos nila or these atheists in the forefront of these technologies/capabilities who are taking the initiative to do something about limited human existence because they don't believe in gods and don't believe humans should just sit around waiting for empty promises—empty products that that religions from the beginning of history are selling to the masses, a pure moneymaking scam?
 
Where did the Devil come from?

God did not create the Devil. Instead, God created the angel who later became the Devil, also known as Satan. Jesus implied that at one time the Devil had been truthful and guiltless. Originally, then, the Devil was a righteous angelic son of God.—Read John 8:44.

How could an angel become the Devil?

The angel who became the Devil chose to oppose God and incited the first human pair to join him. He thus made himself Satan, which means “Resister.”—Read Genesis 3:1-5; Revelation 12:9.

Like the rest of God’s intelligent creatures, the angel that became the Devil had the freedom to choose between doing right and doing wrong, but he developed a desire to be worshipped. His desire for glory was stronger than his desire to please God.—Read Matthew 4:8, 9; James 1:13, 14.

Boss obvious naman naniniwala ako may Diyos, na predict din kaya nya ang pag-saway ng mga angel at syempre mag lilead nun opposition, pero hindi intensyon ng Diyos yun, kasi baka may freewill din ang mga angel katulad satin.
Pero natatawa ako may mga atheist na nakaka-encounter ng multo, ayaw nilang sabihing multo yun, lagi nilang sinasabi physics, phenomena or just an accident. Kaya tama ang sinabi ng Bible ang mga demonyo raw ay kayang manggaya at target daw nito mga pinuno at darating ang panahon kasama raw sila sa paghuhukom.
 
There is no god: what recent findings tell us

attachment.php



When you ask if there is a god, consider the most recent developments in human knowledge:

WHAT MODERN RESEARCH ON THE HUMAN BRAIN HAS TO SAY

  1. It’s now established that hearing voices is unique to some populations of the earth. It’s a result of a defect in the brain anatomy of some people, tied to how the brain evolved from the earliest life forms to what we see now in humans.
  2. Most of these humans fall in the category of people who suffer from schizophrenia, whether mild or extreme.
  3. In human history, those who came up with the idea of gods are these very same people who are convinced that they heard voices in their heads, and that these voices were from supernatural beings—gods.
  4. The first time a human being hears about any god, he has no idea about it. If he is forced enough to do so, the human will react by creating a god personality within a compartment in his brain. Each human’s idea of a god and his relationship with him will vary from person to person.
  5. Any human can do this because of the unique power of the brain to summon multiple personalities within itself. In people with traumas, this can go undiagnosed for many years and manifest in the world as various forms of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.
  6. People with extreme schizophrenia and bipolar disorder can believe their minds’ creations as if they were real: be it certain other people, fantastic beings—or gods. Even famous artists and scientists suffer from this malady.
  7. Extend all these information to the dawn of human history and think about the kind of leaders and mystical personalities that have peopled human societies, governments, religious establishments.


WHAT MODERN ASTROPHYSICS HAS TO SAY

  1. We now know enough of the history of the universe from the first trillionth of a second to ascertain that there is no reason to believe any supernatural being is needed to create the universe.
  2. Left to itself, the vacuum of space has enough power to create the universe and all the structures that we know populate it: superclusters, galaxies, solar systems, planets, asteroids, comets, etc.


WHAT MODERN BIOGENETICS HAS TO SAY

  1. Our knowledge of the workings of DNA/RNA leads us to believe that soon humans will have the ultimate power of creation of life forms within their hands.
  2. Intensive research in the nonbiological origins of life has come up with many ideas that are all plausible in the context of the situations that were at work on primordial Earth and the solar system.
  3. Many of the molecules that are relevant to the creation of life are found in many astronomical bodies. They are not unique to Earth.
  4. Many laboratory experiments from the time of Urey to recent ones have come up with the proteins and other organic molecules that are all critical to the synthesis of life as we know it.
  5. Whether life started in the deep ocean, land, or puddles of mud helped by ultraviolet radiation will soon be resolved by the onset of new knowledge and technologies—the gene editing technology CRISPR, for example—that enable humanity to extend its control of the biological processes that govern themselves.
 

Attachments

  • thereisnogod-final.jpg
    thereisnogod-final.jpg
    181.4 KB · Views: 102
Re: There is no god: what recent findings tell us




When you ask if there is a god, consider the most recent developments in human knowledge:

WHAT MODERN RESEARCH ON THE HUMAN BRAIN HAS TO SAY

  1. It’s now established that hearing voices is unique to some populations of the earth. It’s a result of a defect in the brain anatomy of some people, tied to how the brain evolved from the earliest life forms to what we see now in humans.
  2. Most of these humans fall in the category of people who suffer from schizophrenia, whether mild or extreme.
  3. In human history, those who came up with the idea of gods are these very same people who are convinced that they heard voices in their heads, and that these voices were from supernatural beings—gods.
  4. The first time a human being hears about any god, he has no idea about it. If he is forced enough to do so, the human will react by creating a god personality within a compartment in his brain. Each human’s idea of a god and his relationship with him will vary from person to person.
  5. Any human can do this because of the unique power of the brain to summon multiple personalities within itself. In people with traumas, this can go undiagnosed for many years and manifest in the world as various forms of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder.
  6. People with extreme schizophrenia and bipolar disorder can believe their minds’ creations as if they were real: be it certain other people, fantastic beings—or gods. Even famous artists and scientists suffer from this malady.
  7. Extend all these information to the dawn of human history and think about the kind of leaders and mystical personalities that have peopled human societies, governments, religious establishments.


WHAT MODERN ASTROPHYSICS HAS TO SAY

  1. We now know enough of the history of the universe from the first trillionth of a second to ascertain that there is no reason to believe any supernatural being is needed to create the universe.
  2. Left to itself, the vacuum of space has enough power to create the universe and all the structures that we know populate it: superclusters, galaxies, solar systems, planets, asteroids, comets, etc.


WHAT MODERN BIOGENETICS HAS TO SAY

  1. Our knowledge of the workings of DNA/RNA leads us to believe that soon humans will have the ultimate power of creation of life forms within their hands.
  2. Intensive research in the nonbiological origins of life has come up with many ideas that are all plausible in the context of the situations that were at work on primordial Earth and the solar system.
  3. Many of the molecules that are relevant to the creation of life are found in many astronomical bodies. They are not unique to Earth.
  4. Many laboratory experiments from the time of Urey to recent ones have come up with the proteins and other organic molecules that are all critical to the synthesis of life as we know it.
  5. Whether life started in the deep ocean, land, or puddles of mud helped by ultraviolet radiation will soon be resolved by the onset of new knowledge and technologies—the gene editing technology CRISPR, for example—that enable humanity to extend its control of the biological processes that govern themselves.

You are always referring to the articles which not created by you. why don't you try to research by your own. sa kalikutan ng utak nga mga gumawa nyan namatay na lang sila na wala namang napala. if really read the bible why dont you try to consider some facts na totoong nangyari naman talaga doon at nangyayari noon. Bible tells na may nabuhay na Emperador na si Augustus Ceasar, Hula na magkakaroon ng mga salot sa mundo, Lilindol sa bawat dako, magkakadigma ang bansa laban sa mga bansa, lalago ang kaalaman at maraming magsasabing walang Dios? it is proven na at nangyayari na ngayon. at hindi lang naman iisang tao ang nagsulat ng Bible madami sila mga apostol. madami rin nahuhukay na mga artifacts and scroll na 2000 years ago.

did you consider it na facts? maybe not. kasi you are always pushing and forcing yourself na ayaw mo itong paniwalaan. and thats the trait of atheist.
 
Re: There is no god: what recent findings tell us

You are always referring to the articles which not created by you. why don't you try to research by your own.

All my sources are peer-reviewed materials. Ang ibig sabihin ng peer-reviewed ay dumaan sila sa maraming screening, maaari silang ulitin ng kahit sino. Kapag galing sa mga peer-reviewed journals/publications, ibig sabihin ay authoritative sources sila. Di kailangan mag-conduct ng sariling research kung ang resulta ay napatunayan na.

a kalikutan ng utak nga mga gumawa nyan namatay na lang sila na wala namang napala.
Karamihan ng malilikot na utak na sinabi mo ay buhay na buhay pa. Di lang yan, malamang kabilang sa mga unang tao na makaka-avail sa immortality projects that are ongoing now.

if really read the bible why dont you try to consider some facts na totoong nangyari naman talaga doon at nangyayari noon. Bible tells na may nabuhay na Emperador na si Augustus Ceasar, Hula na magkakaroon ng mga salot sa mundo, Lilindol sa bawat dako, magkakadigma ang bansa laban sa mga bansa, lalago ang kaalaman at maraming magsasabing walang Dios? it is proven na at nangyayari na ngayon. at hindi lang naman iisang tao ang nagsulat ng Bible madami sila mga apostol. madami rin nahuhukay na mga artifacts and scroll na 2000 years ago.

did you consider it na facts? maybe not. kasi you are always pushing and forcing yourself na ayaw mo itong paniwalaan. and thats the trait of atheist.
Alamin mo muna kung sino ang sumulat ng bible at kung paano ito sinulat. Sinulat ng apostol? Walang apostol na sumulat ng bible, lahat ay interpolated lamang ng Roman Catholic forgers.

Kung meron man mga nabanggit na historical figures ang bible, hindi ibig sabihin ay factual na siya. Kung ang Superman at Batman comics ba na bumanggit kay Obama at Trump, sasabihin mo na factual na?

Sinong tao ang di makakaalam sa mga sakuna, lindol, at iba pang trahedya sa mundo? Kahit mangmang sa kalsada kayang gawin yan. Maraming hulahop sa bible na sinulat pagkatapos na maganap ang *hula*. May nagbanggit na rin dito, si aliester, sa ganyang istilo na tinatawag na Vaticinium ex eventu—prophesying after the fact, para palabasin na nagkatotoo ang mga hula. Ang problema ng mga tao na to ay mabibisto rin pala sila.
 
Re: There is no god: what recent findings tell us

pag inisip ko po na may Diyos, segurado ako mayroon talaga at tooong may Diyos, basta po inisip ko na meron, nasa isip ko nga po e, kaya nag-eexist yung Diyos sa isip ko,
di ko nakikita,
di ko nahahawakan,
di ko naaamoy, iniisip ko lang, ibig sabihin nililikha ko lang ang Diyos sa aking isip, iniisip ko na makapangyarihan yung Diyos gaya ng sinasabi sa akin ng mga magulang ko at ng mga relihiyoso ;)

pero pag namatay na ako, di na gagana ang utak at di na makakapag-isip e segurado wala na rin yang Diyos na yan kase wala ang aking isip ;)

pero sa ibang tao na buhay pa at nakakapag-isip pa at iniisip din nila na may Diyos e, segurado may Diyos para sa kanila dahil nililikha nila sa isip nila at nag-eexist sa isip nila yun :clap:
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom