What Does the Bible Really Teach? II

[aNsWeRkEy02]

My bad.. Ok.. Yes it is allowed by God but He doesn't prefer it, it was the rule of the land that time where they can have slaves, because nga diba puro war noon. Because some nation treat their slaves badly, yung hinde na masyadong makatao then God intervene. He control it by giving privilages to the slaves (If you read it as a whole you, makikita mo po yun). God give us freedom, so slavery exist that time, its not the best way, at least merun pa rin pong control.. Nandun prin po yung moral po, gnun po ang pamumuhay dati kaya tanggap nila yun at least nagkaroon sila ng privilages as slaves..
.

nag intervene na lang siya..di pa niya pinagbawal..alam na nga niyang mali (or baka di niya kinoconsder na mali)..


cmon..god siya diba..aka all knowing at all powerful..di ba xa kayang sundin ng mga people niya kung ipag utos niya yun..


saka kahit sa new testament..di pinagbawal ni jesus christ yan..and to think he had all the opportunity to stop that..

parang utang na loob pa pala nung slaves kay god na pwede silang bugbugin basta nakakatayo pa sila after two days..I dont care about the priveleges..slavery as a whole is immoral..

ok last question..supposed iapply natin yung pagtrato ng mga masters a slave sa bible..sabi mo may priveleges (yet pwede sya hampasin basta buhay pa siya at nakakatayu after three days)
would you let one of your love one..aswa, anak, nanay mo..maging slave?

may priveleges naman eh..

 

[jtribaco]

^ paulit ulit na yan quote mining lang kasi... basahin kasi ang background ng story...

@thread: Bible teaches good living...

 

[ronell10]

^ paulit ulit na yan quote mining lang kasi... basahin kasi ang background ng story...

@thread: Bible teaches good living...

Paano po yung good living na tinuturo? Sorry di ako nagbabasa at ayaw ko basahin

 

[marjunz]

The bible really teach is to be Good and Bad or to be Bad or Good.

opinion lng po..

 

[marjunz]

The bible really teach is to be Good and Bad or to be Bad or Good.

opinion lng po..

 

[AmhaArites]

Eto po question ko sa inyong tatlo, pwedeng sagutin or hindi Do you believe in your religion?

My position is not egotistical but demonstrates my confidence that the Bible is the right standard against which to measure one's religion. Our Religion did so,thus Yes!

 

[ronell10]

My position is not egotistical but demonstrates my confidence that the Bible is the right standard against which to measure one's religion. Our Religion did so,thus Yes!

Thanks bro, i respect that

 

[aNsWeRkEy02]

^ paulit ulit na yan quote mining lang kasi... basahin kasi ang background ng story...

@thread: Bible teaches good living...

lol bottomline is the bible does not forbid slavery..ano pang background story ang need jan? eh wala naman siyang inestate na bawal yan..

Bible teaches good living..plus how to treat your slave and how to implement force labor

would you let one of your love one..aswa, anak, nanay mo..maging slave? given the said privilages plus the guidelines like beating it

 

[Freyjadour Falenas]

nag intervene na lang siya..di pa niya pinagbawal..alam na nga niyang mali (or baka di niya kinoconsder na mali)..


cmon..god siya diba..aka all knowing at all powerful..di ba xa kayang sundin ng mga people niya kung ipag utos niya yun..


saka kahit sa new testament..di pinagbawal ni jesus christ yan..and to think he had all the opportunity to stop that..

parang utang na loob pa pala nung slaves kay god na pwede silang bugbugin basta nakakatayo pa sila after two days..I dont care about the priveleges..slavery as a whole is immoral..

ok last question..supposed iapply natin yung pagtrato ng mga masters a slave sa bible..sabi mo may priveleges (yet pwede sya hampasin basta buhay pa siya at nakakatayu after three days)
would you let one of your love one..aswa, anak, nanay mo..maging slave?

may priveleges naman eh..

Dahil po iyan sa freedom, God give us the freedom to choose kung ano gusto natin gawin, and that is the rule that time, accepted ng lahat po iyon and that is fair for them, read out the whole passage po, don't cut out sections or verses, di po natin maiintidihan.

Sa panahon ngayon kung ganun ang batas ng mundo na pede mag slave papayag ako, eh ganun eh, parang ngayong panahon, sa ibang bansa pede mo bitayin yung nagkasala, paano po pag yung pamilya mo po o kamag-anak mo nagkasala dun at yun ang gagawin nila sa kanila, papayag ka po ba? eh yun nga po ang batas nila..

Moderation ika nga.. di ba patas yun?..

 

[aNsWeRkEy02]

Dahil po iyan sa freedom, God give us the freedom to choose kung ano gusto natin gawin, and that is the rule that time, accepted ng lahat po iyon and that is fair for them, read out the whole passage po, don't cut out sections or verses, di po natin maiintidihan.

Sa panahon ngayon kung ganun ang batas ng mundo na pede mag slave papayag ako, eh ganun eh, parang ngayong panahon, sa ibang bansa pede mo bitayin yung nagkasala, paano po pag yung pamilya mo po o kamag-anak mo nagkasala dun at yun ang gagawin nila sa kanila, papayag ka po ba? eh yun nga po ang batas nila..

Moderation ika nga.. di ba patas yun?..

accepted? or baka wala lang mgawa yung mga slave kasi ultimo si god di yun pinagbawal..

isa pa nung panahon na yun nakikipag ugnay kuno si god sa mga tao niya..nagbigay pa nga siya ng ten commandments eh..

so ibig mong sabihin mas mataas yung batas ng tao kesa sa utos ni god? na kahit si god walang mgawa kasi batas yun nun?

eto yung quote ni mightymarc..makes sense din nga naman

Bullocks!

Isang line lang pwedeng pwede na sabihin ni god na "abolish slavery, its not right to own a human being"... ISA LANG LINE YAN, ISA! pwede mo rin gawing 2 verses. Hindi nagawang isulat?!? Dahil hindi yun ang purpose ng bible?

Political issues ba?

O eh bakit di naisama pa rin ang tungkol sa pagtrato sa kababaihan bilang under sa lalaki sa ibang bible verses?!?

"Women should be silent in the churches, for they are not permitted to speak, but should be submissive, as the law also says." (1 Corinthians 14:34)

Dyan pa lang kitang kita mo na ang biased ng sumulat ng verses na yan. Pero ang tungkol sa immoral na slavery wala man lang nabanggit!

"Judge for yourselves: Is it proper for a woman to pray to God with her head uncovered? Does not even nature itself teach you that if a man has long hair it is a disgrace to him, but that if a woman has long hair, it is her glory? For her hair is given to her as a covering." (1 Corinthians 11:13-15)

Ayan tungkol sa buhok. Buhok?!? Trivial na yan ha, pero naisama pa sa bible. Pero ang tungkol sa slavery, wala. Pinaburan pa, may guidelines pa on how to treat your slaves.

 

[Freyjadour Falenas]

accepted? or baka wala lang mgawa yung mga slave kasi ultimo si god di yun pinagbawal..

isa pa nung panahon na yun nakikipag ugnay kuno si god sa mga tao niya..nagbigay pa nga siya ng ten commandments eh..

so ibig mong sabihin mas mataas yung batas ng tao kesa sa utos ni god? na kahit si god walang mgawa kasi batas yun nun?

eto yung quote ni mightymarc..makes sense din nga naman

Hindi po natin pwedeng i-compare po ang batas natin sa batas ni God, it is two different thing po. Parang tubig at mantika po yun. God doesn't force us to follow His rule, but nagbigay siya ng consequences na pedeng mangyari pag di mo sinunod ang rule nya po.. Iba po ang pagiisip ng Diyos sa pagiisip ng tao na tulad mo at tulad ko po.

Yung kay mightymarc po, yung sa old testament po, trivial pa ang mga tao noon, at ganun po ang pamumuhay nila na may slaves etc etc. Wala naman pong masama sa ganun kasi nga po accepted nga po ng lahat yun at parang sa batas natin ngayon na tinatanggap na ng karamihan. Di ba ikaw po, tanggap mo na bumaril ang sundalo sa kalaban niya??? Ganyan din po dati..

 

[vander_01]

yes sir we can say so,the Bible account in the first chapter of Genesis simply states the general order of creation. It allows for possibly thousands of millions of years for the formation of the earth and many millenniums in six creative eras or days to prepare the for human habitation. Some dinosaurs may indeed have been created in the fifth era listed in Genesis,when the bible says tha God made flying creatures and great sea monsters. Perhaps other types of dinosaurs were created in the sixth epoch. The vast array of dinosaurs with their huge appetites would have been appropriate considering the abundant vegetation that evidently existed in their time. Gen.1:20,21-'' And God went on to say: ''Let the waters swarm forth a swarm of living souls and let flying creatures fly over the earth upon the face of the expanse of the heavens.'' 21 And God proceeded to create the great sea monsters and every living soul that moves about,which the waters swarmed forth according to their kinds,and every winged flying creature according to its kind. And God got to see that it was good.''.

---
nice piece of trivia

 

[vander_01]

Oh and angels dont have wings, i heard its artist representation of early painters. And the devil that has horns came from the egyptian god of fertility, the one with the head of a ram.

 

[AmhaArites]

A piece of bread for everyone in this thread: ''The wicked one according to his superciliousness makes no search; All his ideas are: '' There is no God.''-Psalm 10:4.

 

[ronell10]

Oh and angels dont have wings, i heard its artist representation of early painters. And the devil that has horns came from the egyptian god of fertility, the one with the head of a ram.

kaya lang ata nilalagyan ng wings ang angels para to represent na they are flying

 

[Xhirako]

...but the cherubim...or the seraphim yata...i'm not sure....has wings...anim pa nga...are they not angels?

 

[balampatitot]

There are 3 classification of Angels:
*Archangels
*Cherubs
*Seraphs
And the bible did not mention literally of them having wings,perhaps its just a representation of their ability to fly.. Makapangyarihan sila.

 

[balampatitot]

Food for thoughts:'' It is the foolishness of an earthling man that distorts his way,and so his heart becomes enraged against Jehovah God himself.'' Prov.19:3

 

[hackerz14]

Oh and angels dont have wings, i heard its artist representation of early painters. And the devil that has horns came from the egyptian god of fertility, the one with the head of a ram.

yes kasi yung mga early painters ay nakakakita ng angels and they thought that angels have wings dahil ang nakikita nila ay yung aura ng angels napagkamalan nilang wings.

 

[Xhirako]

...do anyone know why 6 wings?..2 covers the face, 2 covers the body, 2 for flying,, wala lang, gusto ko lang malaman,, the ones made at the arc of covenant has wings also,