Know the Truth [C.F.D] WHO REALLY CHANGED THE TEN COMMANDMENTS?

[rcell]

Re: Know the Truth Page [Catholic Apologetics] Pangungumpisal sa Pari

Tanong ko lang po

Ang meaning po ng Catholic ay laganap di po ba ...tanong ko lang po laganap po ba kayo.

Ang Iglesia catholica apostolica Romana ay nasa biblia po ba....Di po ba sa israel oh sa jerusalem nag simula ang aral ng Dios

Bkit po lagi sa Roma sinasabi ng catholico nag simula ang aral ng Dios.

Naba ko po halos lahat ng paliwang u po ay nasa biblia din ...ang Rosario Purgatorio oh limbo ay nasa biblia din ba?

kailangan ba natin pag fiestahan ang bawat santo?

Dapat po ba talga natin lagyan ng litrato ni jesus ang bawat kapilya natin at totoo po ba na ganun ang itsura nya

dahil na pansin ko po iba iba ang itsura nito.

Tama po ba na si Jesus ay may Mahabang buhok?

Hinde po ba tayo pwede dumerekta sa Dios ama sa pamamagitan ni Jesus kung mananalagin tayo

Bakita kailangan pa sa mga Rebulto,Litrato mga santo kay birhen maria tayo makikipag usap?

Bakit po pinag babawal dati ng mga catholico na mag basa ng biblia at ang masumpungan nito ay papatayin ( sinusunog )

Bakit may Jose Rizal at mga 3 pari na lumaban sa Catholico dahil sa maling turo na pinapasamba ang mga rebulto

Dapat bang patayin sila..

Dapat ba talga bindesyunan yung patay na nasa libingan na

Tama po ba ang ginawa ng papa sa Roma na humingi sya ng pasensya sa mga halos milyong tao na pinapatay

ng mga catholico Romano

 

[BBCAtomic]

Re: Know the Truth Page [Catholic Apologetics] Pangungumpisal sa Pari

Question by : rcell

Tanong ko lang po

Ang meaning po ng Catholic ay laganap di po ba ...tanong ko lang po laganap po ba kayo.

Ang Iglesia catholica apostolica Romana ay nasa biblia po ba....Di po ba sa israel oh sa jerusalem nag simula ang aral ng Dios

Bkit po lagi sa Roma sinasabi ng catholico nag simula ang aral ng Dios.

Naba ko po halos lahat ng paliwang u po ay nasa biblia din ...ang Rosario Purgatorio oh limbo ay nasa biblia din ba?

kailangan ba natin pag fiestahan ang bawat santo?

Dapat po ba talga natin lagyan ng litrato ni jesus ang bawat kapilya natin at totoo po ba na ganun ang itsura nya

dahil na pansin ko po iba iba ang itsura nito.

Tama po ba na si Jesus ay may Mahabang buhok?

Hinde po ba tayo pwede dumerekta sa Dios ama sa pamamagitan ni Jesus kung mananalagin tayo

Bakita kailangan pa sa mga Rebulto,Litrato mga santo kay birhen maria tayo makikipag usap?

Bakit po pinag babawal dati ng mga catholico na mag basa ng biblia at ang masumpungan nito ay papatayin ( sinusunog )

Bakit may Jose Rizal at mga 3 pari na lumaban sa Catholico dahil sa maling turo na pinapasamba ang mga rebulto

Dapat bang patayin sila..

Dapat ba talga bindesyunan yung patay na nasa libingan na

Tama po ba ang ginawa ng papa sa Roma na humingi sya ng pasensya sa mga halos milyong tao na pinapatay

ng mga catholico Romano

Answered by : Splendor of the Church

Ang meaning po ng Catholic ay laganap di po ba...tanong ko lang po laganap po ba kayo.


Tama ka kapatid. Oo laganap sa buon mundo ang Catholic Church, wala pa sa mundo ang mga Protestante ay namamayagpag na ang simbahang Katoliko. .

Revelation 7:9 9After these things I looked, and behold, a great multitude which no one could count, from every nation and all tribes and peoples and tongues, standing before the throne and before the Lamb, clothed in white robes, and palm branches were in their hands;

Ang Iglesia catholica apostolica Romana ay nasa biblia po ba....Di po ba sa israel oh sa jerusalem nag simula ang aral ng Dios.
Bkit po lagi sa Roma sinasabi ng catholico nag simula ang aral ng Dios.

Ang IKAR ay hindi makikita sda Biblia dahil ang Iglesia Katolika Apostolica Romana (IKAR) ay MARKA o PALATANDAAN na Tunay na Iglesia ng Dios.

Bakit may mga Palatandaan ang Tunay na Iglesia ni Cristo?

Ang ating Panginoong Jesu Kristo ay, DAAN, ng ating kaligtasan (Juan 14:6). Ang Iglesia o Simbahan na katawan niya, ay tinawag ding DAAN (Gawa 24:14).

Ang sabi sa aklat ng Jeremias 31:21, na lalagyan ng mga palatandaan ang DAAN. Nabubuo ang katuparan nito noong Vatican Council sa 1870, ng opisyal na naiihayag ang buong descriptive o palatandaan nito, na, Holy Catholic Apostolic Roman Church.

Bakit Holy o Santa ang tunay na Iglesia ni Cristo? Dahil, sinabi ito ni Pablo sa I Corinto 14:33.

Bakit Catholic ang tunay na Iglesia ni Cristo? Dahil, ito ang sabi ng Panginoong Jesu Cristo sa Mark 11:17, na tatawagin itong “…of all nations…,” na ibig sabihin Universal o Catholic.

Bakit Apostolic ang tunay na Iglesia ni Cristo? Dahil, ang mga apostoles po ang unang mga kaanib nito (Efeso 2:20).

Bakit Roman ang tunay na Iglesia ni Cristo? Dahil, ang centro o ang pangkalahatang pamamahala nito ay una doon ito sa Jerusalem (Lukas 24:47) dahil doon ito nagsisimula. Pero, sabi ng Panginoon sa Mateo 21:43 (KJV), ililipat ito sa ibang lugar, na maka-bunga ng marami. Malayo daw sa Jerusalem ang lugar na ito (Gawa 2:39). Ang malayong lugar na ito, ay lugar ng mga Hentil (Gawa 22:21). Nilinaw ng Panginoon kung anong exact na lugar ito, ang Roma (Gawa 23:11). Roma, dahil, lugar ito ng mga Hentil, naayon sa sinabi sa Gawa 22:21, na lugar ito ng mga Hentil.

READ MORE : Kung may Tanong ka pwedde ka mag comment dito : CLICK ME. WAG POD TAYONG TAMARIN MAG BASA


Nabasa ko po halos lahat ng paliwang u po ay nasa biblia din ...ang Rosario Purgatorio oh limbo ay nasa biblia din ba?

Rosario :

ANG SALITANG “ROSA” AY GALING SA LATIN BIBLE, THE VULGATE:

Sir_39:17 [Latin Vulgate] “in voce dicit obaudite me divini fructus et quasi ROSA plantata super rivum aquarum fructificate”

Sir 39:17 [Douay-Rheims Bible] “By a voice he saith: Hear me, ye divine offspring, and bud forth as the rose planted by the brooks of waters.”

ANG WORD NA “RIO” AY HINDI LATIN KUNDI SPANISH AT ITO AY MAKIKITA SA SPANISH BIBLE:

Rev 22:1 [Sagradas Escrituras] “DESPUÉS me mostró un RIO limpio de agua de vida, resplandeciente como cristal, que salía del trono de Dios y del Cordero.”

PERO MAY MAS MAGANDANG TALATA NA PINAGKUNAN NG SALITANG ROSARY. ITO AY ANG SALITANG LATIN NA “ROSARUM” GALING SA LATIN VULGATE BIBLE:

Sir_50:8 [Latin Vulgate] “quasi arcus effulgens in nebulam gloriae et quasi flos ROSARUM in diebus veris quasi lilia quae sunt in transitu aquae et quasi tus redolens in diebus aestatis”

Sir 50:8 [Douay-Rheims Bible] “And as the rainbow giving light in bright clouds, and as THE FLOWER OF ROSES in the days of the spring, and as the lilies that are on the brink of the water, and as the sweet smelling frankincense in the time of summer.”

Ang ibig sabihin ng Rosario o Rosary ay Flower of Roses

YUN NGA LANG PARA HINDI SILA MAPAHIYA INALIS NI MARTIN LUTHER SA LISTAHAN NG BIBLIA ANG AKLAT NA IYAN AT 6 PANG AKLAT KAYA KULANG ANG AKLAT NG MGA PROTESTANTE AT NG MGA MANALO DAHIL BINAWASAN NI MARTIN LUTHER PARA HINDI SILA MAPAHIYA.

Kung may tanong kapa o comment punta ka po dito : CLICK ME

Purgatorio :

Panoorin mo po ang bago naming Episode sa Know The Truth sa First Page na ang Title ay Purgatory. Salamat po

Limbo :

Ang limbo po ay hindi Opisyal na Doktrina ng Catholic Church..

A THEOLOGICAL OPINON. A theologican opinion supported by many theologians of the Church. - Fr. Abe Arganiosa

his theological opinion as Father Abe noted is labeled in Dr Ludwig Ott’s Fundamental of Catholic Dogma as sentencia communis which means that it is espouse as a common belief by many theologians. The international theological commission report which studied the fate of the infants who die without receiving the sacrament of Baptism has stated that the doctrine of limbo remains to be a valid theological opinion. This is based on the premise that all of us are born into this world in the state of original sin which is the absence of sanctifying grace which is a necessary pre-requisite for a soul to enter into the happiness of heaven. Now divine revelation has informed us of no other certain means by which the stain of original sin in infants is washed away except through the waters of Baptism. Thus although the Catechism teaches that there is the possibility of salvation for infants who die without receiving the sacrament of Baptism yet this is not based on certitude but on the virtue of hope which rests on God’s mercy. There is still much theological difficulties on both sides i.e,, those who espouse the doctrine of Limbo and those who don’t. If and when the Church will definitely decide on this matter may not happen in the near future. -Ramon Gitamontoc

kailangan ba natin pag fiestahan ang bawat santo?

FEASTS ARE VERY BIBLICAL. THOSE WHO DO NOT HAVE FEAST DO NOT BELONG TO GOD BUT TO THE DEVIL. THE TESTIMONIES OF SCRIPTURES CONCERNING THE ORIGIN OF FEASTS ARE VERY CLEAR:

Exodus 12:14 And this day shall be unto you for a memorial; and ye shall keep it a feast to the LORD throughout your generations; ye shall keep it a FEAST by an ordinance for ever.

GOD ORDERED MOSES AND HIS PEOPLE TO CELEBRATE A FEAST. AND THE LORD JESUS ATTENDED A FEAST AS WELL:

Luke 5:29 And Levi made him a GREAT FEAST in his own house: and there was a great company of publicans and of others that sat down with them.

More Comment and Questions? Go Here : CLICK ME

Dapat po ba talga natin lagyan ng litrato ni jesus ang bawat kapilya natin at totoo po ba na ganun ang itsura nya
dahil na pansin ko po iba iba ang itsura nito. Tama po ba na si Jesus ay may Mahabang buhok?

Bakit naman hindi? Kahit ang Templo na ginawa ni Solomon eh meron pang mga Larawan ng Hayop.

You can read here : CLICK ME
CLICK ME

Hinde po ba tayo pwede dumerekta sa Dios ama sa pamamagitan ni Jesus kung mananalagin tayoAMA

Pwede naman basta sa pamamagitan ni Cristo papunta sa AMA. Sa amin po kasi humihingi kami ng tulong sa mga Saint o Kay Maria na ipanalangin kami kay Cristo at ipapanalangin naman kami ni Cristo sa Kanyang AMA.

Read more about Intercession of Saints : CLICK ME

Bakita kailangan pa sa mga Rebulto,Litrato mga santo kay birhen maria tayo makikipag usap?


Wala namang Problema yun. Nasaiyo kung saan mo gusto manalangin sa harap ng rebulto o hindi..


Bakit po pinag babawal dati ng mga catholico na mag basa ng biblia at ang masumpungan nito ay papatayin ( sinusunog )

hmmm.. Konti lang ang alam ko about dito.. Nngunit subukan mo mag tanong sa mga Official CFD's namin Specially Fr. Abe and Atty Mars. sa SplendoroftheChurch.com.ph/blog at knowthetruth.ph.

Bakit may Jose Rizal at mga 3 pari na lumaban sa Catholico dahil sa maling turo na pinapasamba ang mga rebulto Dapat bang patayin sila..

I can't answer you here dahil kulang ang aking kaalaman.. Try to consult here more about Jose Rizal : CLICK ME

Dapat ba talga bindesyunan yung patay na nasa libingan na

Bakit hindi? Meron bang mawawala kung Ipanalangn natin sa Diyos ang kanilang Kaluluwa? Ganuon namin kamahal ang mga namatay.

Tama po ba ang ginawa ng papa sa Roma na humingi sya ng pasensya sa mga halos milyong tao na pinapatay

ng mga catholico Romano

Kung ang Dios ay kayang mag-patawad ang tao pa kaya? Si Saint. Paul Maraming Pinatay ngunit siya ay pinatawad..

KUNG MERON KA PA PONG COMMENT O IBA PANG TANONG PUNTA KALANG PO SA MGA LINK NA IBINIGAY KO. SALAMAT PO AND GOD BLESS YOU..​

 

[asiantreasure]

Re: Know the Truth Page [C.F.D] New : Pagsamba sa Rebulto?

ang pagsamba ng hindi totoong dios ay pagansm

 

[BBCAtomic]

Re: Know the Truth Page [C.F.D] New : The Catholic Church!

The Top 25 Biblical Reasons (Why I Have Remained/You Should Remain) a Catholic and Catholicism is The True Religion

By : Lay Person Scripturist

1. Catholics attend Holy Mass Daily and Receive Communion

The believers of God in the past gather in the temple every day and break the bread.

“And day by day, attending the temple together and breaking bread in their homes, they received their food with glad and generous hearts.”(Acts 2:46, English Standard Version)

Catholics gather in the church every day because of the mass and receive communion as well.

2. Catholics believe that the host is the body of Christ

Many of those who oppose the Catholic Church also do something like the Holy Communion but they do not recognize the bread as the body of Christ.

“For if you do not recognize the meaning of the Lord’s body when you eat the bread and drink from the cup, you bring judgment on yourself as you eat and drink.”(1 Corinthians 11:29, Good News Translation)

For the Catholic Church, receiving communion is not only the important matter but the belief that the bread is also the body of Christ.

3. Catholics Perform The Corporal Works Of Mercy

Many Catholics give importance to the commandments of Christ such as feeding the hungry, giving water to the thirsty, visiting the sick and those in the prison, helping the homeless, and giving clothes to those who do not have anything to wear.

“When the Son of Man comes in his glory with all his angels, he will sit on the throne of his Glory.All the nations will be brought before him, and as a shepherd separates the sheep from the goats, so will he do with them, placing the sheep on his right and the goats on his left. The King will say to those on his right: ‘Come, blessed of my Father! Take possession of the kingdom prepared for you from the beginning of the world. For I was hungry and you fed me, I was thirsty and you gave me drink. I was a stranger and you welcomed me into your house. I was naked and you clothed me. I was sick and you visited me. I was in prison and you came to see me.’Then the good people will ask him: ‘Lord, when did we see you hungry and give you food; thirsty and give you drink, or a stranger and welcome you, or naked and clothe you? When did we see you sick or in prison and go to see you?’The King will answer, ‘Truly, I say to you: whenever you did this to these little ones who are my brothers and sisters, you did it to me.”(Matthew 25:31-40, Christian Community Bible)

If we were to survey, there are many Catholic organizations that do these since the church believes that worshiping God is not enough if it does not include the corporal works of mercy.

4. Catholics Care for the Orphans

There are religions that say religions are not necessary but cannot deny the fact that there are religions that God is happy with such as those that car for orphans, children without parents, old folks who are not cared for.

“Religion that is pure and undefiled before God, the Father, is this: to visit orphans and widows in their affliction, and to keep oneself unstained from the world.”(James 1:27, English Standard Version)

There are many organizations made up of nuns like the divine mercy community which helps these people.

5. Catholics Invite The Poor And Those With Disabilities To Feed Them

“But when you give a reception, invite the poor, the crippled, the lame, the blind,”(Luke 14:13, New American Standard)

6. Catholics are proud of the Cross of Christ

Saint Paul is not ashamed but is proud of doing this.

“As for me, may I never boast about anything except the cross of our Lord Jesus Christ. Because of that cross, my interest in this world has been crucified, and the world’s interest in me has also died.”(Galatians 6:14, New Living Translation)

Many Catholics make the sign of the cross and are proud of this.

There are many religions ashamed of the Cross.

That is why they condemn the Catholics who are proud of the Cross.

This is not surprising since the Apostle Paul said this a long time ago.

“Brothers, join in imitating me, and keep your eyes on those who walk according to the example you have in us. For many, of whom I have often told you and now tell you even with tears, walk as enemies of the cross of Christ.”(Philippians 3:17-18. English Standard Version)

7. Catholics Help Those Devastated by Calamities

Catholics do this just like the early Christians who work together to help victims of calamities.

“And the disciples, every man according to his ability, determined to send relief unto the brethren that dwelt in Judea: which also they did, sending it to the elders by the hand of Barnabas and Saul.”(Acts 11:29-30, American Standard Version)

8. Catholics Have Higher Respect For Saints Especially The Virgin Mary

Catholics cannot offend saints from Heaven since this is an act of false prophets.

Many religions ridicule Catholics because of the act of venerating saints.

“These false teachers are bold and arrogant, and show no respect for the glorious beings above; instead, they insult them.”(2 Peter 2:10. Good News Translation)

9. Catholics Teach Followers To Give According To What The Heart Dictates

Just like Saint Paul and Christians, Catholics are not forced to give big donations but are allowed to decide regarding this.

“Each one must give as he has decided in his heart, not reluctantly or under compulsion, for God loves a cheerful giver.”(2 Corinthians 9:7, English Standard Version)

This can be five, 10, 100, 1,000 or half of their incomes.

Even if believers do not give anything, you cannot hear any complaints from the Catholic Church.

10.) Catholics Donate Blood

Just like what Christ said there is no love greater than a person who offers his life and Catholics prove their love for others by offering their lives and by donating their blood,

“Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends.”(John 15:13, American Standard Version)

Donors value the lives of their brothers so they can still continue to place importance of life in this world.

This was not done by Jehovah’s witnesses which claim to be the true religion. Instead, they allow their members to die even if the doctor asks for a blood transfusion to prolong the life of that person who needs blood badly.

11. The Lord’s Prayer is accepted and used by Catholics

Do you hear the religions chastising the Catholic Church pray the Lord’s Prayer? Their alibi is Christ did not say “pray this” but “pray like this”.

“Pray like this: Our Father in heaven, may your name be kept holy.May your Kingdom come soon. May your will be done on earth, as it is in heaven. Give us today the food we need,and forgive us our sins, as we have forgiven those who sin against us. And don’t let us yield to temptation,but rescue us from the evil one.(Matthew 6:9-13, New Living Translation)

The question is, if Catholics listen to the example taught by Christ, is this wrong? Did Christ give a wrong example?

At least, the example we followed is the example of Christ

12. The Catholic believes in the fruits of the Holy Spirit

The Catholic believes in the fruits of the Holy Spirit.

One of the fruits of the Holy Spirit is Self-control.

Self-control entails asking for the guidance of the Holy Spirit and this is the solution needed.

There is no need for the RH Bill.

“But the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness, gentleness, self-control; against such things there is no law.”(Galatians 5:22-23, English Standard Version)

It is because of self-control coming from the Holy Spirit that Catholics believe that Saint Joseph did not touch the Blessed Mary.

Hence, there was no sexual thing that happened since God was careful in choosing the Mother of our Savior.

Many anti-Catholics do not believe this since they say it is impossible that there was no sex between Joseph and Mary. However, there is nothing impossible for Catholics because of the Holy Spirit’s guidance. If the Spirit guides a person, he can control himself so as not to counter the wishes of God.

13. Catholics Pray At 3:00 PM

One of the favorite prayers of Catholics is the 3 o’ clock prayer.

The Disciples of Christ pray at 3:00 pm.

“One day Peter and John went to the Temple at three o’clock in the afternoon, the hour for prayer.”(Acts 3:1, Good News Translation)

- - - Updated - - -

 

[Actzuki]

Re: Know the Truth Page [C.F.D] New : The Catholic Church!

Continuation Above

14. Catholics do not judge others whatever day they choose to worship

if the apostle paul does not condemn or ridicule the day that other religions choose to worship, catholics also do not say that it is wrong to pray on saturdays.

“therefore no one is to act as your judge in regard to food or drink or in respect to a festival or a new moon or a sabbath day-”(colossians 2:16, new american standard)

15. Catholics do not judge other religions that they will go to hell

they are not like others who introduce themselves as christians and say that catholics will go to hell and those who do not join their religion will not be saved.
Catholics recognize that only god is the judge and has the right to decide who will be saved or not.

“god alone, who gave the law, is the judge. He alone has the power to save or to destroy. So what right do you have to judge your neighbor?”(james 4:12, new living translation)

16. Catholics use the bible which has not been edited

if you will see the bible of other religions, there are only 66 books while catholics have 73.

They do not have the books of tobit and sirach.

If you will open the king james version, new international version, lamsa translation, new world translation, and other versions used by anti-catholics, you will notice that they do not have tobit and sirach.

a number of books have been included in some versions of catholic bibles discovered in qumran and these are tobit, ben sira (also known as sirach or ecclesiasticus). The parts of these books (tobit, sirach, and the letter of jeremiah) can be found in the septuagint which is the greek translation of the hebrew scriptures.

The truth is there are many good pieces of advice in sirach that we can follow to make us look pleasing before god.

17. Catholics have the sacrament of confirmation

for other religions, baptism is enough to receive the holy spirit. This is not enough for catholics.

There are many things that the bible says such as the holy spirit did not descend on them even if they have been baptized. They only received the spirit when the apostles of christ placed their hand on them.

“now when the apostles at jerusalem heard that samaria had received the word of god, they sent to them peter and john, who came down and prayed for them that they might receive the holy spirit, for he had not yet fallen on any of them, but they had only been baptized in the name of the lord jesus. Then they laid their hands on them and they received the holy spirit.”(acts 8:14-17, english standard version)

it is important that we receive the holy spirit and this is possible through confirmation.

The person who does not have the holy spirit will not understand the word of god. Those who condemn catholics say that we should only read the bible because we do not understand the truth.

This is wrong since reading the bible alone does not mean that we will understand the mystery written in the bible.

“and the spirit said to philip, go over and join this chariot. So philip ran to him and heard him reading isaiah the prophet and asked, do you understand what you are reading? And he said, how can i, unless someone guides me?” and he invited philip to come up and sit with him.”(acts 8:29-31, english standard version)

how can we understand what is written in the bible if we will not be guided by the holy spirit? How can we be blessed by the holy spirit if we have not received it? How will we receive it if it has not come down us? How can the spirit come down if we have received the sacrament of confirmation? How will a person receive the sacrament of confirmation if this is not done inside the church?

18. Catholics believe that priests are emissaries of god

many religions claim that they are emissaries of god.

You will not hear from catholic priests that they claim to be emissaries of god.

“for it is not he who commends himself that is approved, but he whom the lord commends.”(2 corinthians 10:18, new american standard)

what does the bible say about priests?

“for the lips of a priest should preserve knowledge, and men should seek instruction from his mouth; for he is the messenger of the lord of hosts.”(malachi 2:7, new american standard)

19.catholic priests follow the vow of celibacy which the apostle paul demonstrated

many claim to be priests of god because other than the catholic church, there are also religions that have their own priests.

What religion has priests who do not marry because they follow the suggestion of saint paul?

Paul said follow me because i followed christ.

the apostle paul served god without any wife just like christ who served without any spouse.

“and this i say for your own profit; not that i may cast a snare upon you, but for that which is seemly, and that ye may attend upon the lord without distraction.” 20. Just like saint paul, catholics did not say that, “we are saved”(1 corinthians 7:35, american standard version)

catholics believe that we were saved from sin by the death of christ on the cross.

20. Catholics do not say that we are truly saved from hell because the apostle paul did not say that he has been saved from hell but strive so he can be saved.

“i do not claim that i have already succeeded or have already become perfect. I keep striving to win the prize for which christ jesus has already won me to himself. Of course, my friends, i really do not[a] think that i have already won it; the one thing i do, however, is to forget what is behind me and do my best to reach what is ahead. So i run straight toward the goal in order to win the prize, which is god’s call through christ jesus to the life above.”(philippians 3:12-14, good news translation)

many religions claim that they are saved and this will not be lost forever.

This contradicts what the apostle paul said that even if he is chosen by god, he can be scorned if he does not discipline himself.

“i discipline my body like an athlete, training it to do what it should. Otherwise, i fear that after preaching to others i myself might be disqualified.”(1 corinthians 9:27, new living translation)

21. Like apostle peter, catholics believe that faith alone is not enough

that is why apostle peter said: Do your best to add other things to your faith.

“because you have these blessings, do your best to add these things to your lives: To your faith, add goodness; and to your goodness, add knowledge; and to your knowledge, add self-control; and to your self-control, add patience; and to your patience, add service for god; and to your service for god, add kindness for your brothers and sisters in christ; and to this kindness, add love. If all these things are in you and are growing, they will help you to be useful and productive in your knowledge of our lord jesus christ.”(2 peter 1:5-8, new century version)

if faith alone is sufficient, apostle peter will not say to add other things to your faith.

If we say add, it means one thing is lacking and we have to add to this.

22. Catholics believe that the church is the pillar and foundation of the truth

the church believes that it is not only the bible which is the only foundation and basis of truth but the church established by god which is the pillar and foundation of the truth.

“so that if i am delayed, you will know how people must conduct themselves in the household of god. This is the church of the living god, which is the pillar and foundation of the truth.”(1 timothy 3:15, new living translation)

this is contrary to what other religions say that the bible is the only foundation and basis of truth.

reading the bible is not enough. Like what happened in the bible, one official read it but he did not understand so he was taught by philip, a servant of god, who was filled by the holy spirit. (acts 8:29-31)

the catholic church is being served by priests who were chosen by god.

When god picks you like the apostle paul as his priest, you will be guided to understand the mystery of the bible.

“to be a minister of christ jesus to the gentiles, ministering as a priest the gospel of god, so that my offering of the gentiles may become acceptable, sanctified by the holy spirit.”(romans 15:16, new american standard)
“and i have been made a servant of the church by god, who gave me this task to perform for your good. It is the task of fully proclaiming his message, which is the secret he hid through all past ages from all human beings but has now revealed to his people. God’s plan is to make known his secret to his people, this rich and glorious secret which he has for all peoples. And the secret is that christ is in you, which means that you will share in the glory of god.”(colossians 1:25-27, good news translation)

not all people are given this capability to understand the mystery of the bible.

“you are permitted to understand the secrets of the kingdom of heaven, but others are not.”(matthew 13:11, new living translation)

23. Catholics believe that christ became man

this means that he is not really man. This is one of the secrets of the religion of saint paul which is the faith of catholics.

“no one can deny how great is the secret of our religion:he appeared in human form, was shown to be right by the spirit, and was seen by angels.he was preached among the nations,was believed in throughout the world,and was taken up to heaven.”(1 timothy 3:16, good news translation)

those who believe that christ did not become man are deceiver and antichrist.

“for many deceivers are gone forth into the world, even they that confess not that jesus christ cometh in the flesh. This is the deceiver and the antichrist.”(2 john 1:7, american standard version)

24. Catholics do not say that catholics will sin by eating pork

the catholic church only says that those who are sick should avoid eating pork.

Pork can cause high blood pressure if you regularly eat pork instead of foods with other essential nutrients.

However, the catholic church does not teach that people who will eat pork will sin.

“food doesn’t go into your heart, but only passes through the stomach and then goes into the sewer.” (by saying this, he declared that every kind of food is acceptable in god’s eyes.)”(mark 7:19, new living translation)

this is not the basis that men will be saved.

“do not be led away by diverse and strange teachings, for it is good for the heart to be strengthened by grace, not by foods, which have not benefited those devoted to them.”(hebrews 13:9, english standard version)

“for the kingdom of god is not a matter of eating and drinking but of righteousness and peace and joy in the holy spirit.”(romans 14:17, english standard version)

25. Catholics believed in the primacy of peter

not all religions believe in the primacy of peter.

That is why the question for anti-catholics who condemn our faith regarding the primacy of peter

can you read a verse in the bible that other apostles of christ except for peter were given the keys of the kingdom of heaven?

And i will give you the keys of the kingdom of heaven. Whatever you forbid on earth will be forbidden in heaven, and whatever you permit on earth will be permitted in heaven.”(matthew 16:19, new living translation)

can you read a verse in the bible that other apostles were told to feed his flock?

“after breakfast jesus asked simon peter, simon son of john, do you love me more than these? Yes, lord, peter replied, you know i love you. Then feed my lambs, jesus told him.jesus repeated the question: Simon son of john, do you love me? Yes, lord, peter said, you know i love you. Then take care of my sheep, jesus said. A third time he asked him, simon son of john, do you love me? Peter was hurt that jesus asked the question a third time. He said, lord, you know everything. You know that i love you. Jesus said, then feed my sheep.”(john 21:15-17, new living translation)

[/b][/quote][/center]

 

[Surf]

Re: Know the Truth Page [C.F.D] New : The Catholic Church!

Is it true that the round white wafer for Roman Catholics is the actual and true body of Christ, so be careful that this white wafer fell on the floor???

Thanks

 

[BBCAtomic]

Re: Know the Truth Page [C.F.D] New : The Catholic Church!

Is it true that the round white wafer for Roman Catholics is the actual and true body of Christ, so be careful that this white wafer fell on the floor???

Thanks

Yes It's true..

 

[jhanelon18]

Re: Know the Truth Page [C.F.D] New : Why Catholic Church is the True Relig

Sana mabasa ito ng mga kapatid nating mga katoliko nang mabigyang linaw.

http://www.divinerevelations.info/d...your_god/tagalog_prepare_to_meet_your_god.pdf


Di pa rin ba tayo naniniwala na ang ating Amang Diyos at ang ating Panginoong Hesukristo ay gumagawa ng paraan para abutin tayo upang ilayo sa kasinungalingan at ilapit sa katotohanan? Akala ba natin na kapag dumadalangin tayo ay hindi Niya tayo naririnig? Akala ba natin na walang makaaalam ng laman ng ating puso na Sinasamba natin Siya, na nagsasabi tayo ng magagandang salita patungkol sa Kanya subalit nakikita naman ang ating mga gawa sa kasalanan? Tayo po ay nasa "End times" pero bakit parang hindi parin natin minumulat ang ating mga mata sa mga nangyayari sa paligid? bakit di natin subukan baguhin ang ating mga sarili? Nagsisimba tayo araw ng linggo pero pagkatapos naglalasing naman o pumupunta sa bahay aliwan? Sumasamba tayo huwebes at linggo pero kagalit naman natin ang di natin kapanampalataya? sinasabihan pa natin ng masasakit na salita! Asan ang aral ng ating Panginoong Hesukristo na ibigin ang kaaway at ipanalangin ang umuusig? Sinasabi natin na mahal natin ang Diyos pero hindi naman natin ginagalang ang ating ama, ina o kapatid. May iba na minumura pa. Sa tingin ba natin na aral lang ba ang Sumamba o magsimba o pumuri sa ating Amang Diyos at sa ating Panginoong Hesukristo? diba aral din naman ang magpakaBANAL sapagka't Siya ay Banal? Huwag maging ipokrito/ipokrita. Tandaan natin na walang malilihim sa ating Diyos. Alam Niya kung tayo ay nagsisinungaling sa Kanya. Gusto ba natin malaman kung totoong inaabot tayo ng ating Amang Diyos at ng ating Panginoong Hesukristo? Pakibasa nalang pong maigi ang mga websites

http://www.insightsofgod.com/

http://www.divinerevelations.info/

http://eternal-destinations.blogspot.com/

http://christiscoming777.com/

http://www.baptizingfire.com/baptizebyblazingfire.htm

Kung mababasa po natin sana lahat ng mga testimonya na nakapaloob sa mga websites at kung mababackground check natin ang mga author, malalaman po natin na totoo ang pagtulong ng ating Amang Diyos at ng ating Panginoong Hesukristo sa mga huling araw gaya nito. Manalangin po tayong lagi sapagka't ang ating Panginoong Hesukristo ay malapit na sa Kanyang pagdating. Sana po ay maunawaan po natin ito. God Bless us all!

 

[BBCAtomic]

Re: Know the Truth Page [C.F.D] New: Bird of Prey – Ravenous Bird?Not FYM?

BIBLE SCHOLARS OVERWHELMINGLY DECLARE ‘KING CYRUS OF PERSIA’ AS THE RAVENOUS BIRD, NOT FELIX YSAGUN MANALO!

Research by : Dr. Joseph Keat Sison

From Barnes notes on the bible….

Calling a ravenous bird from the east – There can be no doubt that Cyrus is intended here (see the notes at Isaiah 41:2, Isaiah 41:25). The east here means Persia. The word rendered ‘ravenous bird’ (עיט ‛ayiṭ) is rendered ‘fowl’ in Job 28:7; ‘bird’ or ‘birds’ in Jeremiah 12:9; ‘fowls’ in Genesis 15:11; Isaiah 18:6; and ‘ravenous birds’ in Ezekiel 39:4. It does not occur elsewhere in the Bible. It is used here as an emblem of a warlike king, and the emblem may either denote the rapidity of his movements – moving with the flight of an eagle; or it may denote the devastation which he would spread – an emblem in either sense especially applicable to Cyrus. It is not uncommon in the Bible to compare a warlike prince to an eagle Jeremiah 49:22; Ezekiel 17:3; and the idea here is, probably, that Cyrus would come with great power and velocity upon nations, like the king of birds, and would pounce suddenly and unexpectedly upon his prey. Perhaps also there may be here allusion to the standard or banner of Cyrus. Xenophon (Cyrop. vii.) says that it was a golden eagle affixed to a long spear; and it is well remarked by Lowth, that Xenophon has used the very word which the prophet uses here, as near as could be, expressing it in Greek letters. The word of the prophet is עיט ‛ayiṭ; the Greek word used by Xenophon is ἀετὸς aetos. The Chaldee has, however, given a different rendering to this passage: ‘I, who say that I will gather my captivity from the east, and will lead publicly like a swift bird from a distant land the sons of Abraham, my friend.’

The man that executeth my counsel – Margin, as Hebrew, ‘Of my counsel.’ It may either mean the man whom he had designated by his counsel; or it may mean the man who should execute his purpose.

Yea, I have spoken – He spake it by the prophets; and the idea is, that all that he had spoken should be certainly accomplished.

From Gil’s exposition of the bible…

Calling a ravenous bird from the east,…. Or “a flying fowl”, or “swift winged bird” (u); for the word used does not so much denote rapaciousness as swiftness; which well agrees with Cyrus, who is here meant, and not Abraham, as Jarchi, nor Nebuchadnezzar, as others; and who was always swift in all his expeditions, and always recommended celerity and dispatch of business to his soldiers and others, as Xenophon (w) often observes; and very remarkable is that speech of Tigranes to him, in which he tells him (x), that he so far exceeded the king of Armenia in swiftness, that he came upon him with a great army, from a far country, before he could get his army together, which was just by him. And very observable are the words of Cyrus himself, who was desirous of being a thorough horseman, that he might seem to be , “a winged” or “flying man” So the Targum here renders it, a swift bird. Aben Ezra, who interprets it of Cyrus, says he is so called, as if he flew to do the will of God; and Kimchi observes of Cyrus, that he has this name because he came swiftly, and in haste, as a bird that flies: and it is no unusual thing for a mighty monarch, or a general, marching with his army, to be compared to a flying bird, particularly an eagle, Jeremiah 48:40 and may be the bird intended here, which well suits with Cyrus, who had, as Plutarch (z) reports, an aquiline nose; hence men that have such noses, among the Persians, are highly esteemed: and Xenophon (a) says, that the standard of Cyrus was a golden eagle upon the top of a high spear, and which is retained by the kings of Persia. Cyrus is said to be called from the east, because, as Kimchi observes, his country lay to the east of Babylon:

the man that executeth my counsel from afar country; as Persia was from Babylon, Assyria and other provinces lying between; but though he lived in a far country, and knew nothing of the affairs of the people of God in Babylon, or what work he was to do, yet God called him, and brought him to do his will, which he was ignorant of: so God sometimes puts into the hearts of men to fulfil his will, which they are strangers to, Revelation 17:17. It is in the Hebrew text, “the man of my counsel” (b); not with whom the Lord consulted, for none are of his counsel in this sense; but whom in his counsels, decrees, and purposes, he appointed to such service, and whom he made use of as an instrument to do his pleasure; see Isaiah 44:8.

yea, I have spoken it, I will also bring it to pass: I have purposed, I will also do it; the counsel of the Lord, concerning the deliverance of his people from Babylon, by the hand of Cyrus; this he had purposed in his own breast, had spoken of in prophecy, and would certainly perform. R. Joseph Kimchi interprets this verse of the Messiah, and so does Jerom, of whom, no doubt, Cyrus was a type; and what is here said agrees with him: he may be compared to a flying bird for his swiftness in coming at the appointed time; he came from the east, as the rising sun of righteousness; he was the man of God’s counsel in the highest sense, and came, being called, to execute it; the work of redemption was according to the eternal purpose of God, and spoke of by all the holy prophets, and now accomplished; and his righteousness and salvation are made mention of in the following verses.

(u) “avem, a velocitate”, Munster; so Vatablus; ab “in volando celeriter et cum impetu”, Forerius; so Ben Melech says, Cyrus is surnamed a fowl, because of his great swiftness and haste to come to Babylon; though he observes that some say, that a ravenous fowl is called the singular may be put for the plural; so Cocceius renders it, “volucres”, birds, and may design the whole army of Cyrus. (w) Cyropaedia, l. 1. c. 17. and l. 3. c. 6. and l. 6. c. 17. (x) Cyropaedia, l. 3. c. 2.( Ib. l. 4. c. 17. (z) In Apothegm. (a) Cyropaedia, l. 7. c. 1.((b) “virum mei consilii”, Munster, Pagninus, Montanus; so according to the Keri: but the Cetib is , “the man of his counsel”.

From the Geneva bible commentaries….

Calling a ravenous {i} bird from the east, the man that executeth my {k} counsel from a far country: yea, I have spoken it, I will also bring it to pass; I have purposed it, I will also perform it.
(i) That is, Cyrus, who will come as swift as a bird and fight against Babylon.

(k) Him by whom I have appointed to execute that which I have determined.

From Clark’s commentary on the bible….

Calling a ravenous bird from the east “Calling from the east the eagle” – A very proper emblem for Cyrus, as in other respects, so particularly because the ensign of Cyrus was a golden eagle, ΑΕΤΟΣ χρυσους, the very word עיט ayit, which the prophet uses here, expressed as near as may be in Greek letters. Xenoph. Cyrop. lib. 7 sub. init. Kimchi says his father understood this, not of Cyrus, but of the Messiah.
From a far country “From a land far distant” – Two MSS. add the conjunction ו vau, ומארץ umeerets; and so the Septuagint, Syriac, and Vulgate.

From Jameson Fausset Brown commentary…

11. ravenous bird—Cyrus so called on account of the rapidity of his marches from the distant regions of Persia to pounce on his prey (see on [820]Isa 41:2; [821]Isa 41:25; [822]Jer 49:22; [823]Eze 17:3). The standard of Cyrus, too, was a golden eagle on a spear (see the heathen historian, Xenophon, 7, where almost the same word is used, aetos, as here, ayit).
executeth my counsel—(Isa 44:28; 45:13). Babylon represents, mystically, the apostate faction: the destruction of its idols symbolizes the future general extirpation of all idolatry and unbelief.

purposed … also do it—(Isa 43:13).

I could keep on going…. But most, if not all experts agree that the ravenous bird from the east is Cyrus. I’ll believe real experts not those pretending to be. There is no evidence that anyone from the Philippines can be the eagle/ravenous bird by any stretch of the imagination.

Plus the edict of Cyrus allowed the scattered Jews from the east, west, north, and south (sound familiar) to resettle in their own land…

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cyrus%27s_edict

The Philippines had no part in the gathering of the Jews, we didn’t exist during the time, so no Filipino can claim to be the ravenous bird from the east

IS CYRUS OF PERSIA EXCLUDED AS BIRD OF PREY BECAUSE HE WAS A PAGAN?

I don’t get the part that Cyrus the great was pagan so he is automatically excluded? Or the manalistas understanding of how big the world was circa 1ad. Even the Jews called Cyrus a ‘messiah’…

This edict is also fully reproduced in the Book of Ezra.

In the first year of King Cyrus, Cyrus the king issued a decree: “Concerning the house of God at Jerusalem, let the temple, the place where sacrifices are offered, be rebuilt and let its foundations be retained, its height being 60 cubits and its width 60 cubits; with three layers of huge stones and one layer of timbers. And let the cost be paid from the royal treasury. Also let the gold and silver utensils of the house of God, which Nebuchadnezzar took from the temple in Jerusalem and brought to Babylon, be returned and brought to their places in the temple in Jerusalem; and you shall put them in the house of God.” (Ezra 6:3–5)

As a result of Cyrus’s policies, the Jews honored him as a dignified and righteous king. He is the only Gentile to be designated as Messiah, a divinely appointed leader, in the Tanakh (Isaiah 45:1–6). Isaiah 45:13: “I will raise up Cyrus in my righteousness: I will make all his ways straight. He will rebuild my city and set my exiles free, but not for a price or reward, says Yahweh Almighty.” As the text suggests, Cyrus did ultimately release the nation of Israel from its exile without compensation or tribute. Traditionally, the entire book of Isaiah is believed to pre-date the rule of Cyrus by about 120 years. These particular passages (Isaiah 40–55, often referred to as Deutero-Isaiah) are believed by most modern critical scholars to have been added by another author toward the end of the Babylonian exile (ca. 536 BC).[96] Whereas Isaiah 1–39 (referred to as Proto-Isaiah) saw the destruction of Israel as imminent, and the restoration in the future, Deutero-Isaiah speaks of the destruction in the past (Isa 42:24–25), and the restoration as imminent (Isa 42:1–9). Notice, for example, the change in temporal perspective from (Isa 39:6–7), where the Babylonian Captivity is cast far in the future, to (Isa 43:14), where the Israelites are spoken of as already in Babylon.[97] According to the traditional view, these final chapters were written by the same author, who spoke about a future situation of which he had prophetic knowledge.
Josephus, the first-century Jewish historian, relates the traditional view of the Jews regarding the prediction of Cyrus in Isaiah in his Antiquities of the Jews, book 11, chapter 1:[98]

In the first year of the reign of Cyrus, which was the seventieth from the day that our people were removed out of their own land into Babylon, God commiserated the captivity and calamity of these poor people, according as he had foretold to them by Jeremiah the prophet, before the destruction of the city, that after they had served Nebuchadnezzar and his posterity, and after they had undergone that servitude seventy years, he would restore them again to the land of their fathers, and they should build their temple, and enjoy their ancient prosperity. And these things God did afford them; for he stirred up the mind of Cyrus, and made him write this throughout all Asia: “Thus saith Cyrus the king: Since God Almighty hath appointed me to be king of the habitable earth, I believe that he is that God which the nation of the Israelites worship; for indeed he foretold my name by the prophets, and that I should build him a house at Jerusalem, in the country of Judea.” This was known to Cyrus by his reading the book which Isaiah left behind him of his prophecies; for this prophet said that God had spoken thus to him in a secret vision: “My will is, that Cyrus, whom I have appointed to be king over many and great nations, send back my people to their own land, and build my temple.” This was foretold by Isaiah one hundred and forty years before the temple was demolished. Accordingly, when Cyrus read this, and admired the Divine power, an earnest desire and ambition seized upon him to fulfill what was so written; so he called for the most eminent Jews that were in Babylon, and said to them, that he gave them leave to go back to their own country, and to rebuild their city Jerusalem, and the temple of God, for that he would be their assistant, and that he would write to the rulers and governors that were in the neighborhood of their country of Judea, that they should contribute to them gold and silver for the building of the temple, and besides that, beasts for their sacrifices.

KUNG MERON KA PA PONG COMMENT O IBA PANG TANONG PUNTA KALANG PO SA MGA LINK NA IBINIGAY KO. SALAMAT PO AND GOD BLESS YOU..

CLICK HERE


​

 

[akosipagong]

Re: Know the Truth Page [Catholic Apologetics]

Exodus 20:4
"You shall not make for yourself an image" in the form of anything in heaven above or on the earth beneath or in the waters below.

Leviticus 26:1
"'Do not make idols or set up an image or a sacred stone for yourselves, and do not place a carved stone in your land to bow down before it. I am the LORD your God.

1. Deuteronomy 4:2
“Ye shall not add unto the Word which I command you, neither shall ye diminish ought from it, that ye may keep the commandments of the LORD your God which I command you.”
2. Deuteronomy 12:32
“What thing soever I command you, observe to do it: thou shalt not add thereto, nor diminish from it.”
3. Jeremiah 26:2
“Thus saith the LORD; Stand in the court of the LORD’s house, and speak unto all the cities of Judah, which come to worship in the LORD’s house, all the words that I command thee to speak unto them; diminish not a word:”
4. Revelation 22:18-19
“For I testify unto every man that hears the words of the prophecy of this book, If any man shall add unto these things, God shall add unto him the plagues that are written in this book: And if any man shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from the things which are written in this book.”
5. Deuteronomy 29:29
“The secret things belong unto the LORD our God: but those things which are revealed belong unto us and to our children for ever, that we may do all the words of this law.”
6. Isaiah 55:8-9
“For My thoughts are not your thoughts, neither are your ways My ways, saith the LORD. For as the heavens are higher than the earth, so are My ways higher than your ways, and My thoughts than your thoughts.”
7. Ephesians 2:7
“That in the ages to come He might shew the exceeding riches of His grace in His kindness toward us through Christ Jesus.”

 

[BBCAtomic]

Re: Know the Truth Page [Catholic Apologetics] New : Far East!

Shameful Understanding of INC-1914 about Isaiah 46:11 and their Ignorance of Hebrew

Studied by : Lay Person Scripturist

”Calling an eangle from the east, the man who executes my counsel from a far country; i have spoken it, I will also briong it to pass; I have purposed it, I will also do it.”(Isaiah 46:11)

Let us study carefully what is written in the original text of the Old Testament based on the Hebrew language which is the basis of translation of the Old Testament.

The ministers and members of INC-1914 often say that the “eagle from the east” is Felix Manalo. They insist that all people should understand that FAR EAST is written in all verses which refer to the Philippines.

Let us look at what a defender of INC-1914 said about Isaiah 46:11.

We will see this information in all the text in green came from the defender of INC-1914. This was relayed to me by a brother who happens to be a Catholic faith defender to find out what I have to say about what he said regarding the alleged defender of INC-1914.

“For comparison and textual criticism: KJV Isaiah 46:11 Calling a ravenous bird from the east, the man that executeth my counsel from a far country: yea, I have spoken it, I will also bring it to pass; I have purposed it, I will also do it.”

In the first paragraph alone, you will see that the alleged defender of INC-1914 is trying to be wise since he is using the bible version that does not depend on the original text of the Hebrew bible.

Is the King James Version Bible based on hebrew and bible manuscripts?

The expert of the Hebrew language gave his declaration about the King James version and this is what he said…

“Any translation must change and fit the original to the new language. In addition when translating a religious text such as the Hebrew bible, translators may sometimes make certain changes to stress certain points of faith. And that might have happened in the king James version.”
Ivri Bunis, Ph.D. Candidate (Biblical Hebrew Teacher)

Moffatt renders Isaiah 46:11 as “far east” since it is the nearest and most accurate translation of the Hebrew word miMizrach which actually means “far east”. not kedem which means only east. the direction in front when facing the sun.

We will see how ignorant the defenders are of INC-1914.

According to him, the Hebrew word ”MiMizrach” means “far east”.

Is this what was taught to the INC 1914?

MiMizrach just means from the east.

Malachi 1:11 talks about “mimizrach shemesh”(שמש ממזרח) referring to where the sun rises as the furthest most east.

Actually what was written in Isaiah 46:11 is מִזְרָח or mizrach which means sunrise.

Some translators put ‘east’ in that text. However, it literally means ‘sunrise’, not ‘east’.

But they both mean east, but come from different Semitic roots.

Qedem comes from the root qadam meaning “to go forward”, “to precede”, while mizrach comes from the root zarach meaning “to arise”, “to appear” (as in the sun).

One of the veteran teachers in Biblical Hebrew gave a statement. Zohar gave a declaration about what was written in Isaiah 46:11.

The deception of INC-1914 is really shameful!

They are trying hard to prove that their founder is being referred to as the Eagle of the east and not Cyrus.

This is the statement of the INC-1914

It is unfortunate that he do not know what is truly written and yet he try to fool people with what he do.

* we now solve the place of calling for the man, he is not from the east of palestine, arabia and mesoptamia nor from Persia
* King Cyrus was from Persia which is a near land making him automatically disqualified and aside from that he does not know Hebrew God nor acknowledge Him as his God only mainly because he is a pagan worshiping other gods.
* a challenge again, do you find Cyrus in the bible and in history as one of the preachers of the teachings of God? definitely no, busted catholic defender found here again.
* i have given the Israelites the freedom now you catholic would like me teach about Hebrew God, watta irrational mind you have? a jackass!

Ezra makes plain that Cyrus is the bird from the east.

“In the first year of Cyrus king of Persia, that the word of the Lord by the mouth of Jeremiah might be accomplished, the Lord stirred up the spirit of Cyrus king of Persia so that he made a proclamation throughout all his kingdom and also put it in writing: Thus says Cyrus king of Persia: The Lord, the God of heaven, has given me all the kingdoms of the earth, and he has charged me to build him a house at Jerusalem, which is in Judah. Whoever is among you of all his people, may his God be with him, and let him go up to Jerusalem, which is in Judah, and rebuild the house of the Lord, the God of Israel—he is the God who is in Jerusalem; and let each survivor, in whatever place he sojourns, be assisted by the men of his place with silver and gold, with goods and with beasts, besides freewill offerings for the house of God which is in Jerusalem.”(Ezra 1:1-4)

“In the first year of Cyrus the king, Cyrus the king issued a decree: Concerning the house of God at Jerusalem, let the house be rebuilt, the place where sacrifices are offered and burnt offerings are brought; its height shall be sixty cubits and its breadth sixty cubits, with three courses of great stones and one course of timber; let the cost be paid from the royal treasury. And also let the gold and silver vessels of the house of God, which Nebuchadnez′zar took out of the temple that is in Jerusalem and brought to Babylon, be restored and brought back to the temple which is in Jerusalem, each to its place; you shall put them in the house of God.”(Ezra 6:3-5)

Cyrus was ancient Israel’s shepherd …

“who says of Cyrus, ‘He is my shepherd,
and he shall fulfill all my purpose’;
saying of Jerusalem. ‘She shall be built,’
and of the temple, ‘Your foundation shall be laid.’”(Isaiah 44:28)

God used Cyrus as His instrument

“Thus says the Lord to his anointed, to Cyrus,
whose right hand I have grasped,
to subdue nations before him
and ungird the loins of kings,
to open doors before him
that gates may not be closed:”(Isaiah 45:1)

Cyrus crushed Babylon which enslaved Israel.
Cyrus returned the people of Israel to their land.

The ancient Hebrew literature (ahl) is not a book about Alaska, America or the Philippines

The Hebrew book of Isaiah contains a history of certain people living between 1100 b.c.e., and 600 b.c.e., along the Jordan river valley; the Hebrew book of Isaiah most assuredly does not narrate a history of or describe or discuss the people of the Philippines.

KUNG MERON PO KAYONG TANONG PWEDE PO KAYO MAG COMMENT OR PUMUNTA SA LINK NA ITO NA RELATED SA TOPIC NATIN.. SALAMAT PO.

CLICK ME

​

 

[ironMar]

Re: Know the Truth Page [Catholic Apologetics] New : Far East!

comment ko lng po..hindi porket far east eh pilipinas n yun..depende un sa lokasyon ng tao kung anu ang far east nya..kung andito k s pilipinas ang far east mo eh estados unidos..tama po b?
tska s pgkakaalam ko lahat ng gawa at pananampalataya ng INC ay nakabasi sa bibliya..eh bat dun s far east nla ngbasi cla s sinasabi ng iba tao n ang far east eh filipinas daw..
----eto un Alin bansa sa malayong silangan ang tinutukoy sa hulang ito ni Propeta Isaias?
Ito ay ang Pilipinas,isang bansang nasa Malayong Silangan.
"The Philippines were Spain's share of the first colonizing movement in the Far East; the name means the 'island of philips' and refers to that grim ruler,King Philips II."[ Ang Pilipinas ay naging bahagi ng Espanya sa unang kilusang pananakop sa Malayong Silangan ang pangalan ay nangangahulugang'mga pulo ni Felipe' at tumutukoy sa malupit na pinunong iyon na si Haring Felipe II.] ( World History,p.445)

Sino pa ang nagpapatunay na ang pilipinas ay nasa malayong silangan?
Ayon kay Horacio dela Costa, isang paring Jesuita,ang Pilipinas ay nasa gitna ng Malayong Silangan;
"It cannot be without significance that the country which stands almost at the geographical center of the Far East,the Philippines should also be that in which Christianity has taken the deepest root..."[Hindi maaring mawalan ng kabuluhan na ang bansa na halos nasa gitnang pangheograpiya ng Malayong Silangan,na ito ay ang Pilipinas, ay siya ring bansang kinatatagang mabuti ng Cristianismo...] (Asia and the Philippines,p.169)

eh kung ako eh nbuhay nung unang panahon at naunang nagsabi n ang far east eh ang pilipinas eh di maniniwala cla skn??? ndi ako galit s INC sakin lang HINDI AKO NANINIWALA NA CLA LANG ANG MALILIGTAS..PARA SAKIN LAHAT NG TAO N GUMAGAWA NG MABUTI AT SUMUSUNOD SA ARAL NG DIYOS AY MALILIGTAS DIN..HINDI MASAMA ANG DIYOS PARA SILA LANG ILIGTAS..

CORRECT IF IM WRONG SA MGA SINABI KO..OPINYON KO LNG TOH..

 

[BBCAtomic]

Re: Know the Truth Page [Catholic Apologetics] New : Mary Ever Virgin!

Mary Ever Virgin!

Answered by : Shadrack Benclamsi Ayemere

The traditional belief of all the Ancient churches is that the Virgin Mary remained a virgin all her life.

  “For neither did Mary, who is to be honoured and praised above all others, marry anyone, nor did she ever become the Mother of anyone else, but even after childbirth she remained always and forever and immaculate virgin.” (Didimus the Blind, The Trinity. 381 AD)

Many Protestants choose to argue with this, quoting the following text:

Matt 1.24-25: And being aroused from sleep, Joseph did as the angel of the Lord had commanded him and took Mary home as his wife, and did not know her until she bore her son, the Firstborn. And he called his name Jesus.

There are two points here.

1. The word “until”, sometimes taken to imply that Joseph “knew” Mary after the birth of Jesus; and

2. “Firstborn”, sometimes taken to imply other children.

With regard to the word “until”, let’s look at the following verses:

Matt 28.20: “..and surely I am with you always, until the end of the age.”

John 21.22: Jesus answered. “If I want him to remain alive until I return, what is that to you?”

2 Sam 6.23: “no son was born to Michol, the daughter of Saul until her dying day.”

In all these examples, the word “until” does not mean that Jesus will cease to be with us after the end of the age, that John was intended to die should he still be alive when Jesus returned, or that Michol had a son after death. The word “until” shows that the writer is concerned primarily to inform us what happens before a specific event – not after.

For the rest, let us allow a very unexpected defender of Marian doctrine to answer the points:

There have been certain folk who have wished to suggest from this passage [Matt 1:25] that the Virgin Mary had other children than the Son of God, and that Joseph had then dwelt with her later; but what folly this is! For the gospel writer did not wish to record what happened afterwards; he simply wished to make clear Joseph’s obedience and to show also that Joseph had been well and truly assured that it was God who had sent His angel to Mary. He had therefore never dwelt with her nor had he shared her company… And besides this, Our Lord Jesus Christ is called the first born. This is not because there was a second or a third, but because the gospel writer is paying regard to precedence. Scripture speaks thus of naming the first-born whether or not there was any question of the second.”

John Calvin; “Sermon on Matthew”, published 1562

BUT WHAT ABOUT JESUS’ BROTHERS MENTIONED IN THE BIBLE?

There are several gospel references to Jesus having “brothers and sisters”. This is the most specific:

Matthew 13:55. “Isn’t this the carpenter’s son? Isn’t his mother’s name Mary, and aren’t his brothers, James, Joses, Simon and Judas? 56 Aren’t all his sisters with us?”

One traditional response is that these may have been children of Joseph from an earlier marriage. Joseph is traditionally held to be much older than Mary.

Another important factor here is that the language used in the Palestine of Jesus’s time was Aramaic. In the Aramaic language used at that time, there was no word in existence to denote cousin. The Jews therefore had to use the word brother where they meant to describe any close male relative. This is so even today in many languages and cultures, particularly where there is an extended family system. The loose term “brother” or “sister” is used to cover the children of ones uncles and aunts as well as those of ones own parents.

WHAT PROOF IS THERE OF THIS?

Gen 14:14 “And when Abram heard that his Brother was taken captive, he armed his trained servants, born in his own house, three hundred and eighteen, and pursued them unto Dan.”

The “brother” referred to here is Lot. Lot was the son of Aran, Abram’s own dead brother (Gen 11:26-28). He was therefore Abram’s Nephew, even though the text refers to him as a “brother”.

BUT THE NEW TESTAMENT WAS WRITTEN IN GREEK, WHICH DOES HAVE A WORD FOR COUSIN.

This is a bit of a red-herring for two reasons. Firstly, there is evidence from the Early Church Fathers that the Book of Matthew, at least, was originally written in Aramaic, and so was translated into Greek. Secondly, we know that the people of Palestine in Jesus’s time spoke in Aramaic, and it is therefore in Aramaic in which the oral stories which were later written down to form the Gospels, were transmitted. So it is likely that the Aramaic word “brother”, meaning not only sibling, but any kinsman, was translated into the Greek word “brother”, which has the tighter meaning of sibling only. This is clearly what has happened in Genesis 14.14 above.

SO WHO WERE THESE “BROTHERS OF JESUS?”

A. While James and Joses are mentioned as Jesus’s brothers in Matthew 13:55, it is made clear in Mathew 27:56 and Mark 15:40 that their mother was another Mary.
Matthew 27:56 Among them were Mary Magdalene, Mary the mother of James and Joses, and the mother of Zebedee’s sons.

This “other Mary” at the Cross, is revealed in John 19:25 to be the wife of Cleophas. Mary of Cleophas is therefore revealed as the mother of two of Jesus’s so-called “brothers”, James and Joses.

B. In John 19:25, the original Greek states. “But by he cross of Jesus were the Mother of Him AND the sister of the Mother of Him, Mary the wife of Cleopas AND Mary the Magdalene.” The precise positioning of the ANDs makes it clear that Mary the Wife of Cleopas, is also referred to as the Virgin Mary’s sister. Since we know no-one has two daughters and calls them BOTH Mary, we know that sister here does not mean sister. The same would apply to “brother” with reference to Jesus.

C. In the introduction to the Book of Jude, Jude introduces himself as: Jude, a servant of Jesus Christ, and a brother of James. If Jude/Judas were truly the brother of Jesus, why wouldn’t he say so? He identifies himself in his letter as brother of James, but significantly as servant of Jesus. To have identified himself as Jesus’s blood brother would have added enormous weight to his epistle, but he doesn’t so identify himself here. We know the reason, because James and Joseph have already been revealed to be sons of the other Mary in Matthew 27 and Mark 15. Judas then must also be a son of this other Mary. Mary wife of Cleophas. So another of Jesus’s so-called “brothers” is eliminated.

D. James “Brother of Jesus” is referred to as one of the APOSTLES by Paul in Galatians 1:19. . We know that neither of the Apostles named James was actually a Son of Mary. So James, “brother of Jesus” cannot be a Son of Mary. He is actually James, Son of Alphaeus (thought to be another form of Cleophas)! James is a kinsman of Jesus, but not a sibling.

A few more points:

In Luke 2:41-51, the twelve-year-old Jesus goes missing on a trip to Jerusalem, and is only found three days later in the temple. Yet in all this time no mention at all is made of any other children, even though the entire family made the journey together. If all the people mentioned in Matthew were actually surviving children of Mary, she would have had at least seven children younger than Jesus to look after! In fact both Mary and Joseph race back to Jerusalem to find him, through country filled with bandits, something they could not have done if there had been babies and other young children in need of care!

The people of Nazareth refer to Jesus as “the son of Mary” (Mark 6:3), not as “a son of Mary.”

Finally, if James and Joseph, Simon and Jude, were children of Mary, and if Jesus had even more brothers and sisters, why did Jesus commit His Mother to the care of St. John at His death?

Related Thread About Mary Ever Virgin

CLICK ME
CLICK ME
CLICK ME​

 

[BBCAtomic]

Re: Know the Truth Page [Catholic Apologetics] New: Men to have Long Hair?

Is it Wrong for Men to Have Long Hair?

Answered by : Lay Person Scripturist

This is the verse used by those who condemn Catholics to hurl invectives at the images we place in the church and our homes.

“Does not even nature itself teach you that if a man has long hair, it is a dishonor to him.”(1 Corinthians 11:14)


Is it Wrong for Men to Have Long Hair?

This is the verse used by those who condemn Catholics to hurl invectives at the images we place in the church and our homes.

“Does not even nature itself teach you that if a man has long hair, it is a dishonor to him.”(1 Corinthians 11:14)

Why did the Apostle Paul say these things to Corinthians?

If we will just study the verses carefully, we will see that he did not give any commands but one argument so that men from Corinth will avoid growing long hair.

Among the problems of that city were immorality and paganism. One of the ways wherein you can see the fusion of immorality and paganism is through the hair of these people.

According to the research on the following verse, 1 Corinthians 11:15

“but if a woman has long hair, it is a glory to her? For her hair is given to her for a covering.”(1 Corinthians 11:15)

One of the actions of pagan women in this city is to have their head shaved as an indication of having worshipped false gods.

[Women sometimes shaved their heads to honor an image of Aphrodite having 'both male and female organs' (Scholiast, <Iliad, II, 280)]

For the men of this city, one indication of having served false gods is to wear the clothes of women and grow long hair.

(It is a sign of homosexuality, The New Jerome Biblical Commentary, page 809)

In other words, the Apostle Paul advised the women of the city not to shave their heads and the men should not grow long hair since these are used in relation to things that God did not like.

Let us remember the message of Apostle Paul was very clear to Corinthians and not all Cnristians.

In truth, it is not forbidden to grow long hair because even Paul had long hair.

“And having remained many days more, having taken leave of brothers, paul saile to syria—and priscilla and aquila were with him–having shaved his head in Cenchrea, FOR HE HAD A VOW”(Acts 18:18)

We will read that Apostle Paul had his hair cut because he made a promise.

Aside from Paul, we will also read of men who made similar vows.

“Then do as we tell you. There are four men among us who have MADE A VOW.”(Acts 21:23)

They followed the Nazarite vow based on the orders of God.

“As long as they remain under their Nazirite vow, they must not eat anything that comes from the grapevine, not even the seeds or skins. During the entire period of their Nazirite vow, no razor may be used on their head. They must be holy until the period of their dedication to the Lord is over; they must let their hair grow long.Throughout the period of their dedication to the Lord, the Nazirite must not go near a dead body.”(Numbers 6:4-6)

According to his vow, any man who does not have his hair cut is a sign of holiness and ownership of God.

If you have more Question or Comments go meron po tayong Link sa First Page.. O i Click itong Link para sa iba pang related topics

CLICK ME

​

 

[rcell]

Re: Know the Truth Page [Catholic Apologetics] New: Men to have Long Hair?

This is the verse used by those who condemn Catholics to hurl invectives at the images we place in the church and our homes.

“Does not even nature itself teach you that if a man has long hair, it is a dishonor to him.”(1 Corinthians 11:14)


Is it Wrong for Men to Have Long Hair?

This is the verse used by those who condemn Catholics to hurl invectives at the images we place in the church and our homes.

“Does not even nature itself teach you that if a man has long hair, it is a dishonor to him.”(1 Corinthians 11:14)

Why did the Apostle Paul say these things to Corinthians?



If we will just study the verses carefully, we will see that he did not give any commands but one argument so that men from Corinth will avoid growing long hair.

Among the problems of that city were immorality and paganism. One of the ways wherein you can see the fusion of immorality and paganism is through the hair of these people.

So kahit po ba sinabi na ni paul na dapat hinde mahaba ang ang buhok sa inyo po pwede mag pahaba ng buhok.

At parang lumalabas na para sa corithians lang yung utos na yun tama po ba

Tanong ko lang po BBCAtomic baptist ka po ba?

At dito sa binigay u po link http://www.splendorofthechurch.com.ph/?s=Long+Hair mas na niniwala po ba tayo sa sabi

ng author na ito kesa sa biblia

At bakit holy Father ang tawag nyo sa pope

 

[BBCAtomic]

Re: Know the Truth Page [Catholic Apologetics] New: Men to have Long Hair?

WHY DO WE WORSHIP ON SUNDAY INSTEAD OF SATURDAY?

Answered by : Lay Person Scripturist

Let us understand the meaning of Sabbath before anything else.

According to a bible dictionary, in easton’s 1897 bible dictionary , the word Sabbath came from the Hebrew word which means, rest or stop work.

The Sabbath for Jews is the seventh day while the Sabbath for Christians is on Sunday.

For Christians, Sunday or the first day is important since this is the day that the Lord Jesus Christ rose again and made sure that Christians will be saved.

If the Lord did not rise from the dead, Christianity would have been gone.

If Christ did not rise from the dead, our teachings would have been for naught and the faith would not have any significance. (1 Corinthians 15:14)

Sunday is so important for those whom Christ saved from sin.

The gathering of Christians in the Bible was done on the sunday.

“We met on Sunday to worship and celebrate the Master’s Supper. Paul addressed the congregation. Our plan was to leave first thing in the morning, but Paul talked on, way past midnight.”(Acts 20:7, The Message)

Why is the collection during the first day of the week done on Sunday?

Thus from then onwards Sunday became the day of Public worship for the apostles as we read, “During the first day of the week, each one has to allot a share of your earnings and save this so you will not have to ask for help when you go there. (1 Corinthians 16:2)”

Also, the truth is it is shown in the Bible that even if Christians do not abstain, they are judged by other people.

To give them strength, Saint Paul told Christians in Colossians, “Do not allow yourself to be overcome by rules about food or drink, feasts or on the rest day. (Colossians 2:16)

To all Brother Catholics, it is said in the Bible that let us not allow ourselves to be judged by those who insist that the Sabbath should not be on Sundays.

Why did the Church change abstinence from Saturday to Sunday?

This is a common misunderstanding!

The early Church did not move the Sabbath from Saturday to Sunday. Instead “The Sabbath, which represented the completion of the first creation, has been replaced by Sunday, which recalls the new creation inaugurated by the Resurrection of Christ” (CCC 2190). Sunday is the day Catholics are bound to keep, not Saturday.

It is wrong to interpret that the Sabbath should be celebrated on the seventh day.If we will read what is written in the Bible, on the first day there will be a holy gathering, you must not work. (Leviticus 23:7)

Understand that during the time of the Hebrews, the days did nt have any names. The first day is called Sunday. The second day is called Monday and so on.

The Sabbath is a day when you should not work and this was commanded by God on the first day.

It is clear that nobody changed the Sabbath, What the people understood that the Sabbtah falls on a Saturday is false.

When Christ became man, this wrong notion was corrected.

“Then Jesus said to them, The Sabbath was made to meet the needs of people, and not people to meet the requirements of the Sabbath.”(Mark 2:27)

For the Jews who do not believe in Christ, the Sabbath Day still remains on Saturday.
Remember this, you cannot read anything in the Bible that the early Christians gathered on Saturday after Jesus rose from the dead.

Why did Christ not meet with His disciples on Saturday?

The disciples gathered on Sunday so that was the day Jesus appeared before them. That Sunday evening the disciples were meeting behind locked doors because they were afraid of the Jewish leaders. Suddenly, Jesus was standing there among them! “Peace be with you,” (John 20:19, New Living Translation)

After a week, the Christians gathered once again.

That night on Sunday, the disciples gathered. The doors were closed because they were afraid of the Jews. Jesus came and stood before them in the middle. He said. Peace be with you. (John 20:26)

Sunday is the most important day for Catholics and Christians since this was the day that the Lord Jesus Christ rose again from the dead.

Read more here :
CLICK ME

Comment and Question?
CLICK HERE​

 

[Actzuki]

Re: Know the Truth Page [Catholic Apologetics] New: Men to have Long Hair?

Mga Kapanalig abangan niyo po ang susunod na kabanata ng Know the truth TV Maria.. Dahil ang mga susunod na kabanata ay tiyak na ikakaliliwanag ng inyong pang-unawa sa ating pananampalataya.. God Bless..

 

[paranoia_rebirth]

Re: Know the Truth Page [Catholic Apologetics] New: Men to have Long Hair?

napakasarap maging katoliko!

 

[BBCAtomic]

Re: Know the Truth Page [C.F.D] New: Watch KTT Episode Ark of the New Coven

Watch the New Episode of Know the Truth Tv Maria " The Ark of the New Covenant " in the first page..

 

[BBCAtomic]

Re: Know the Truth Page [C.F.D]New: Ating pag-aralan Iglesia ni Cristo 1914

“CHURCH OF CHRIST” WAS ESTABLISHED IN 1836 IN USA BY WARREN STONE AND ALEXANDER CAMPBELL NOT IN 1914 BY FELIX MANALO

By : Silent Crusader

“CHURCH OF CHRIST” WAS ESTABLISHED IN 1836 IN USA BY WARREN STONE AND ALEXANDER CAMPBELL NOT IN 1914 BY FELIX MANALO. In which case, Jesus had given the go signal and okay to Stone and Campbell first to re-establish this.

REVELATION 1:8 “I am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end, saith the Lord God, who is, and who was, and who is to come, the Almighty.”

–that Jesus was the beginning and the end, the Lord God almighty who is (present), who was (the past), who is to come (the future), the Almighty. He was to come and become man to redeem man from sinfulness.

REVELATION 22:16 “I Jesus have sent my angel, to testify to you these things in the churches. I am the root and stock of David, the bright and morning star.”

-Only God can send His angels not by a special man that He will come in the line of David and He will be the bright and the morning star. There is neither word in the bible that Jesus was just a special man nor He claimed He is not God.

REVELATION 22:18-19 “For I testify to everyone that heareth the words of the prophecy of this book: If any man** shall add to these things, God shall add unto him the plagues written in this book. And if any man*** shall take away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God shall take away his part out of the book of life, and out of the holy city, and from these things that are written in this book.”

**And who was this man that added himself to the bible? ANSWER: Felix Manalo

***And who was this man that took away the verses about the Divinity of Jesus and the biblical truth of the TRINITY? ANSWER: Felix Manalo

Is there still a chance for the members of the Iglesia ni Felix Manalo to return to the fold of God? ANSWER: YES. Simply walk away from these heresies and follow the real true God – Jesus Christ. Not the man-made Jesus Christ of Felix Manalo.

CONCLUSION:

This site http://www.studyiglesianicristo.com/Verses/comparative-verses-intro.html you provided speaks for itself. The verses that INC made comparison of are true because they are from the bible. However, the truth was changed and corrupted when they began their erroneous explanations misleading and turned people away from God and used these erroneous and corrupted teachings to convert people who are weak in faith to join the Iglesia ni Felix Manalo.

THE BEGINNING

Normally, when you want to study God, you will start from the beginning like the Book of Genesis. What is missing in all their comparative studies of the TRINITY is the beginning of everything. Who is the ALPHA and how did He create man? So now we know in the preceding verse REVELATION 1:8 that the ALPHA was God so did He create man? In GENESIS 1:26 this is how God created man: “And he said: Let us make man to our image and likeness: and let him have dominion over the fishes of the sea, and the fowls of the air, and the beasts, and the whole earth, and every creeping creature that moveth upon the earth.”

Hold on right here, wait a minute, God is singular isn’t He according to INC? But the bible say “Let ‘US’ make man to ‘OUR’ image”? So was God alone when He created man or was it three of them? The bible is clear God speaketh here in the plural number, to insinuate the plurality of persons in the Deity and this is biblically true as a doctrine that Catholics believe in.

So who did God create at that time in REVELATION 1:26? Wasn’t he Adam and not Jesus? According to Felix Manalo, Erano Manalo, Eduardo Manalo and all the ministers of Iglesia Ni Cristo and +summer21 it was Jesus not Adam who was the first created man. Hmmm…. let’s examine what happened before, during and after in next paragraph then.

GENESIS 1:25-28

[25] “And God made the beasts of the earth according to their kinds, and cattle, and every thing that creepeth on the earth after its kind. And God saw that it was good.”

So God at this point had already created everything on earth animals, etc… and God wants now to create man in His image and likeness, but the bible did not say that but this is what God said “let US create MAN in OUR image” so who is LET US and OUR IMAGE then???? Aren’t they the TRINITY? But according to Iglesia Ni Cristo, there is only one God and that Jesus was not a God but just a “special man”. And this is another add-on to the Holy Scriptures, INC said Jesus is not God but only a SPECIAL MAN but where in the bible is this that can show this claim of special man by INC is biblical? Nada, nothing, right? This is because this INC’s doctrine is just another add-on to INC’s heresies and they added to their own invisible bible version.

So if this what INC says, why then God not just say to Himself, ‘now I am going to create man in my own image and likeness’? But again this could not be true for that is not what the bible says. So again INC’s claim of one God is truly wrong. Let’s see then what happened in verses 26-28 to find out what The TRINITY created.

[26] “And he said: Let us make man to our image and likeness: and let him have dominion over the fishes of the sea, and the fowls of the air, and the beasts, and the whole earth, and every creeping creature that moveth upon the earth.” [27] “And God created man to his own image: to the image of God he created him: male and female he created them. [28] And God blessed them, saying: Increase and multiply, and fill the earth, and subdue it, and rule over the fishes of the sea, and the fowls of the air, and all living creatures that move upon the earth.”

According to INC, there is only one God, but verse 26 says “Let US make man in OUR image” – so INC really is wrong and perverting the Holy Scriptures. Verse 27 says “to the image of God he created him: male and female he created” so INC is wrong again when they say Jesus was the first created being because the bible says it was Adam and not Jesus for in the bible Jesus was the WORD and the WORD was with God and the WORD is God. He is one of the TRINITY from the beginning of time who created everything, therefore Jesus was not the first created being but Adam that the bible was saying. So again INC is wrong. JOHN 1:1 “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God.” 1 JOHN 1:1 “That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have looked upon, and our hands have handled, of the word of life:” But Iglesia Ni Cristo mislead people and unknowingly is saying that God lied from the beginning.

If INC says Jesus was the first created man so why then Adam was the first created male along with Eve as the first female. INC is truly perverting everything that God does and says. If INC insists that Jesus was the first created man then Jesus would have been the husband of Eve and she would have come from Jesus’ rib and not from Adam? Are we all clear at this point yet? So truly INC is not telling the truth.

Additionally, INC has to prove and show verses that “Jesus is a special man”. And INC has not done that so far or at least show verses and prove that Jesus said something or similar to “I am Jesus and I am not God but a man or a special man.”

But didn’t we all know that Jesus was to come as the Messiah or the Christ to be born of the virgin Mary? So if INC says Jesus was the first created man then He would not be born in Bethlehem in stead should be in the Garden of Eden with Eve. And if INC will continue to insist that Jesus was the first created man and the first born, then it would be logical then to say that Eve gave birth to Jesus as the first born. But we all know this is not true and correct at all. So Iglesia Ni Cristo’s perverted teachings are all teachings from the devil and not words of God at all.

Following more on INC’s erroneous belief that Jesus was the first man created by God, if Jesus then was in the Garden of Eden, He would then have been the father of Cain and Abel and not as the redeemer of mankind. So now everything really is pointing to just one thing, that is Iglesia Ni Cristo is truly one of the biggest lying churches in the world today.

So where is Adam in the equation then if INC is saying that Jesus was the first created man? I have to repeat this ‘first created man – special man” concept over and over again so that this INC lies about Jesus as being the first special man created by God will be as clear as the sky. Jesus was not the first created special man for Jesus is the one and only begotten Son of God before creation, the WORD in the TRINITY – no more no less.

This Felix Manalo really is something, isn’t he? Okay let’s cut this short.

The question is why Iglesia ni Felix Manalo didn’t touch this GENESIS 1:26 when it is a very important starting event on the history of mankind? What could be the reason?

What is revealing is that all the biblical verses on the TRINITY were disregarded and TRUTH OF THEIR SPIRITUAL MEANING were removed in all INC’s teachings and doctrines considering and dismissing them as purely unbiblical and mere inventions of the Church Fathers and the Catholic Church.

***The verses mentioned are original and not to be discarded easily as if they are not worth a dime and don’t mean a thing at all. INC should not pervert those verses just like when they have inserted Felix Manalo as an angel in REV. 7:2-3

***It is amazing how INC can simply just disregard all these many verses about the TRINITY, the Divinity of Jesus but only delve on the human nature of Jesus Christ. They totally disregarded all the verses about Jesus’ Divinity just to support their ideological doctrines and teachings.

When Jesus speaks of Himself as God to “his sheep”, they hear and understand Him for they know Him. But when He speaks to his “other sheep”, he speaks in parables and speaks of God as His father in heaven who sent Him for they don’t know Him, they don’t have the truth yet and they cannot understand. It is hard for them to understand and believe so Jesus speaks to them as a man and this is what those verses were for and also for INC but Iglesia ni Felix Manalo instead of understanding these verses properly, INC uses them incorrectly to prove that Jesus was just a SPECIAL MAN (not found in any bible) and nothing else and that is what INM or INC is all about. INM or INC is still the other sheep up to now as they cannot be “Jesus’ sheep” for they are still blind and blind cannot see the truth for all along they were guided by a blind man, Felix Manalo, who made them all blind themselves as well.

MATTHEW 13:10-17

OTHER SHEEP (2000 YEARS TOO LONG TO STILL BE A BLIND FOLLOWER)
10 And his disciples came and said to him: Why speakest thou to them in parables? 11 Who answered and said to them: Because to you it is given to know the mysteries of the kingdom of heaven: but to them it is not given. 12 For he that hath, to him shall be given, and he shall abound: but he that hath not, from him shall be taken away that also which he hath. 13 Therefore do I speak to them in parables: because seeing they see not, and hearing they hear not, neither do they understand. 14 And the prophecy of Isaiah is fulfilled in them, who saith: By hearing you shall hear, and shall not understand: and seeing you shall see, and shall not perceive. 15 For the heart of this people is grown gross, and with their ears they have been dull of hearing, and their eyes they have shut: lest at any time they should see with their eyes, and hear with their ears, and understand with their heart, and be converted, and I should heal them.

JESUS’ SHEEP

16 But blessed are your eyes, because they see, and your ears, because they hear. 17 For, amen, I say to you, many prophets and just men have desired to see the things that you see, and have not seen them, and to hear the things that you hear and have not heard them.

Reference: “Compare Iglesia Ni Cristo Beliefs”

ABOUT THE ENEMIES OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH: (From within and from the outside)

http://catholicsilentcrusade.blogspot.com/2013/10/17-beware-how-church-enemies-organized.html

One of the enemies of the Catholic Church from outside: http://catholicsilentcrusade.blogspot.com/2014/01/27-different-religious-beliefs.html

FELIX MANALO’s dishonesty: http://www.examineiglesianicristo.com/honesty3.html

THE LIES ABOUT “FAR EAST” (PASUGO December 1970 page 10 VS. PASUGO July 1997 page 5)
- https://www.facebook.com/iglesiacul...0.1409532710./678140775577623/?type=3&theater

More from https://www.facebook.com/iglesiacult

Church of Christ was first established in 1836 by Warren Stone and Alexander Campbell in the United States not by Felix Manalo in 1914 in the Philippines.

If you have Comment and Question Etc.. Please click the link below :

CLICK ME





​