Symbianize Forum

Most of our features and services are available only to members, so we encourage you to login or register a new account. Registration is free, fast and simple. You only need to provide a valid email. Being a member you'll gain access to all member forums and features, post a message to ask question or provide answer, and share or find resources related to mobile phones, tablets, computers, game consoles, and multimedia.

All that and more, so what are you waiting for, click the register button and join us now! Ito ang website na ginawa ng pinoy para sa pinoy!

Chess Thread

nice one boss! tagal na rin hinde nakapaglaro ng chess at nakabisita sa thread na to.. puro moba games kasi ako now :rofl:
 
Pag minalas to si Carlsen at binuwenas si So baka si So mag number one at the end of the year. To early to tell, though, but if So keeps playing consistently, 2017 might be the year he truly announces himself as a legit contender for the chess crown. Ano ba nangyayari kay Caruana? After Giri, si Caruana naman ang mukhang wala sa mood these days, sliding down the rankings quickly.

So's relationship with Lotis Key is kind of suspect too. It might be a thing waiting to blow up his face later. Surprised to learn Fischer had also the same relationship with the family of this once-local-cinema personality. From Dolphy to chess would be the last thing on my mind about this woman. :lol:
 
natapos ung laro ni So na walang talo kay mamedyarov...talo sya by time sayang natapos ung record nya na walang talo sa tour ng shamkir
 
First time in a while that So did not win a tournament he's entered. Mamedyarov also broke So's streak w/o a loss.

^ If it's any consolation, not one of the participants finished with a clean slate, everybody sporting a loss or two after the event. Sharing 2nd place with the likes of Topalov and Kramnik is also not bad, hehe.

Anyway, stumbled upon this piece, for those wondering what's Kaspa is up to nowadays...

Garry Kasparov on Russia, chess, and the great gambit of AI
 
Mga brother, baka merong kayong swiss pairings for android cellphone. Pa share naman. Kailangang lang sa school. Thanks and GOD bless.
 
Pag minalas to si Carlsen at binuwenas si So baka si So mag number one at the end of the year. To early to tell, though, but if So keeps playing consistently, 2017 might be the year he truly announces himself as a legit contender for the chess crown. Ano ba nangyayari kay Caruana? After Giri, si Caruana naman ang mukhang wala sa mood these days, sliding down the rankings quickly.


Pati si Nakamura may struggles din. Impressive na consistent si Carlsen.Hehe.

Anyway, eto maganda na android tactics puzzle app.

https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=net.lrstudios.android.chess_problems&hl=tl
 
Tactical blunder is losing a piece or getting mated(but there is a defense that you failed to see).Everybody blunders, but better players blunder less.

These are the things that will help you reduce blunders:

1. Solve easy and harder tactics problems.

- You solve easy problems for pattern recognition. You solve harder puzzles for calculation improvement.

2. Always study your opponent's last move.

3. Always look at the whole board to see piece positioning

4. Before you make a move, check if there is a tactical drawback.

5. Stop playing bullet chess.

6. Study endgames and strategies. If you you have good position the chance of making a blunder lessens. Studying endgames and strategies is also necessary for improvement.

There are situations where you are winning easily and it makes you pay less attention to your opponent's move. This could result in a blunder. It is important to always study your opponents last move until the end(even if you are winning).

There is also this tendency at not looking at the whole board. This could lead to blunders. For example, you might place a rook where it can be captured by your opponent's bishop sitting at the corner. Because you are not looking at the whole board, you failed to notice your opponent's bishop.
 
Last edited:
sir tanong ko lang anong opening ang pinakamagandang gamitin??
 
sir tanong ko lang anong opening ang pinakamagandang gamitin??

Depende po iyan sa level mo at style. Kung baguhan ka palang, lagi na sinasabi na against e4, you should reply with e5. Against d4, you should reply with d5. For beginners, following the general opening principles is enough. Ang focus dapat ng study ay tactics, endgames and strategies. Focus on reducing blunders and improving tactical ability by studying tactics. Solving puzzles everyday is a good way to improve tactics.
 
The king is back: Chess legend Garry Kasparov comes out of retirement

His painful and very public defeat against IBM's Deep Blue computer heralded the end of human dominance over artificial intelligence.

Yet 20 years on Garry Kasparov is still considered the greatest chess player in history, a genius so special he became world champion at 22 and was then almost invincible for two decades.

Now, 12 years after he turned his back on the professional game, the king is back.


http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2017/07/06/king-back-chess-legend-garry-kasparov-comes-retirement/
 
Not taking anything off Kasparov's quality as a great player, I still wonder how it would have been if he were playing at a time when Fischer was at the peak of his powers. Even against Karpov, Kaspa only holds a lifetime edge of a single or couple of games advantage (could be wrong here).

There's also the matter of how FIDE readjusted the ratings after Fischer's withdrawal from official chess play, which critics saw as a means to dislodge him from the top of the rankings. In Fischer's time, his official rating was seen as almost impossible to scale again by other players.

Of course it would make a very interesting couple of years to see how Kaspa would do against the current crop of players, with Carlsen, his very own protege, lording it over the field. I haven't really seen how the top players today play their games, but I still recall the great tactical innovations that Kaspa and his batch introduced to the chess world, to the amazement of many observers of the game. He and Karpov probably drained all the possibilities in the e4 and d4 openings, the Sicilian and the Ruy Lopez, for example.
 
Not taking anything off Kasparov's quality as a great player, I still wonder how it would have been if he were playing at a time when Fischer was at the peak of his powers. Even against Karpov, Kaspa only holds a lifetime edge of a single or couple of games advantage (could be wrong here).

There's also the matter of how FIDE readjusted the ratings after Fischer's withdrawal from official chess play, which critics saw as a means to dislodge him from the top of the rankings. In Fischer's time, his official rating was seen as almost impossible to scale again by other players.

Of course it would make a very interesting couple of years to see how Kaspa would do against the current crop of players, with Carlsen, his very own protege, lording it over the field. I haven't really seen how the top players today play their games, but I still recall the great tactical innovations that Kaspa and his batch introduced to the chess world, to the amazement of many observers of the game. He and Karpov probably drained all the possibilities in the e4 and d4 openings, the Sicilian and the Ruy Lopez, for example.


Magaling si Karpov. In fact, si Karpov ay may hawak ng pinakamaraming tournament titles of all time. Iyung iba ang tingin, si Karpov ang greatest of all time. So hindi nakakapagtaka na Kasparov only has slight positive score against Karpov. Kung titingnan mo, Korchnoi has a positive score against Fischer, but Kasparov has an overwhelming score against Korchnoi. Personally, I favor Kasparov in his prime against Fischer in his prime.

I don't believe that FIDE want to dislodge Fischer from the top. Records are meant to be broken. Just like Carlsen surpassing Kasparov's highest rating of all time record.


The time control for this tournament is rapid and blitz. Kung okay ang kalabasan, baka try uli ni Kasparov ang classical time format.
 
Last edited:
Magaling si Karpov. In fact, si Karpov ay may hawak ng pinakamaraming tournament titles of all time. Iyung iba ang tingin, si Karpov ang greatest of all time. So hindi nakakapagtaka na Kasparov only has slight positive score against Karpov. Kung titingnan mo, Korchnoi has a positive score against Fischer, but Kasparov has an overwhelming score against Korchnoi. Personally, I favor Kasparov in his prime against Fischer in his prime.

I don't believe that FIDE want to dislodge Fischer from the top. Records are meant to be broken. Just like Carlsen surpassing Kasparov's highest rating of all time record.


The time control for this tournament is rapid and blitz. Kung okay ang kalabasan, baka try uli ni Kasparov ang classical time format.

Karpov is of a much safe positional player than either Kaspa or Fischer. The latter players could also thrive in chaotic positions and win them, a style of play that really excites casual and critical observers. Nakakabuhay ng dugo, sabi, introducing the element of controlled confusion in the board. Karpov's classical training is against that, though he showed some flashes of the same in his lengthy battles with Kaspa.

There's also that controversial ruling in Kaspa and Karpov's championship match where rules were changed just when Karpov was leading by some margin. This is probably one of the reasons people take Karpov as the greatest rather than Kasparov.

I don't have the exact figures of number of games, but lifetime head-to-head comparisons of any two players should only matter if they had played each other under a championship run or the like, much the same way we do now with Kasparov and Karpov after their legendary championship games. The stats could be skewed by a number of factors if we don't do this. For example, peak Korchnoi scored a number of wins against a youngish Fischer, as did Tal I think, something that would be in doubt in a titular event and for a lengthy continuous number of games at the height of Fischer's ascendancy later on.

The controversy regarding the rating tweaking received critics from many sectors way back, but FIDE stood its ground. It should make for an interesting read for those who are seriously drawn to this topic. There was a claim then, for example, that FIDE intentionally gave too much ways for a player to achieve higher rating despite the relative lower strength of the event, so on and so forth.

Going back to the ratings, I recall that chess then was viewed as almost an extension of the Cold War between the former USSR and the US. Chess at the time was shrouded in heavy international politics and intrigue, and the rating move was viewed as sheer manipulation spearheaded by USSR honchos bent on proving that USSR players rank supreme in the chess world. It was such that the US declared it a national holiday when Fischer took the crown from Spasski, a first for the nation and against its mortal enemy no less.
 
Last edited:
Karpov is of a much safe positional player than either Kaspa or Fischer. The latter players could also thrive in chaotic positions and win them, a style of play that really excites casual and critical observers. Nakakabuhay ng dugo, sabi, introducing the element of controlled confusion in the board. Karpov's classical training is against that, though he showed some flashes of the same in his lengthy battles with Kaspa.

There's also that controversial ruling in Kaspa and Karpov's championship match where rules were changed just when Karpov was leading by some margin. This is probably one of the reasons people take Karpov as the greatest rather than Kasparov.
I don't have the exact figures of number of games, but lifetime head-to-head comparisons of any two players should only matter if they had played each other under a championship run or the like, much the same way we do now with Kasparov and Karpov after their legendary championship games. The stats could be skewed by a number of factors if we don't do this. For example, peak Korchnoi scored a number of wins against a youngish Fischer, as did Tal I think, something that would be in doubt in a titular event and for a lengthy continuous number of games at the height of Fischer's ascendancy later on.

The controversy regarding the rating tweaking received critics from many sectors way back, but FIDE stood its ground. It should make for an interesting read for those who are seriously drawn to this topic. There was a claim then, for example, that FIDE intentionally gave too much ways for a player to achieve higher rating despite the relative lower strength of the event, so on and so forth.

Going back to the ratings, I recall that chess then was viewed as almost an extension of the Cold War between the former USSR and the US. Chess at the time was shrouded in heavy international politics and intrigue, and the rating move was viewed as sheer manipulation spearheaded by USSR honchos bent on proving that USSR players rank supreme in the chess world. It was such that the US declared it a national holiday when Fischer took the crown from Spasski, a first for the nation and against its mortal enemy no less.

Iyon iyung pinatigil ng FIDE ang world championship dahil exhausted na daw ang parehong players. Parehong nagprotest si Kasparov at Karpov. Bago matigil ang laro na kay Kasparov ang momentum as he is rallying back. Actually it is Karpov's many tournament wins against strong competition ang reason kung bakit may mga tingin si Karpov ang greatest.But overall compare to Karpov, more people thinks that Kasparov is the greatest.


Actually Korchnoi reached his peak at his latter stage of his career. The Korchnoi that beat Fischer is not peak korchnoi .
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom