Symbianize Forum

Most of our features and services are available only to members, so we encourage you to login or register a new account. Registration is free, fast and simple. You only need to provide a valid email. Being a member you'll gain access to all member forums and features, post a message to ask question or provide answer, and share or find resources related to mobile phones, tablets, computers, game consoles, and multimedia.

All that and more, so what are you waiting for, click the register button and join us now! Ito ang website na ginawa ng pinoy para sa pinoy!

iSHARE: NINOY + PEOPLE POWER: HIDDEN TRUTHS THE MEDIA IS NOT TELLING US!

Sige simulan mong i-push yang petition na yan maganda yan. Gobyerno na mismo naglalabas ng mga baho nila. Di lang basta propaganda makikita mo sa social media, mas marami kang makikitang hinanaing ng taong bayan na di nailalabas ng media. Dun mo makikita yung tunay na sinisigaw ng karamihan na di nilalabas sa media. Tanong ko lang ano ang mas disente? Sugpuin ang krimen? Pagkasunduin ang gobyerno at mga rebelde at lahat ng relihiyon para mahinto ang gulo o magpamudmod ng pera na galing sa kaban ng bayan at pangungurakot?? Di pa ba kita lahat ngayon iisa ang sigaw at lahat nagkasundo mapa relihiyon, organisasyon kahit mga rebelde pa yan, iisa ang gusto nila. Wag na magpakabulag sa kunwaring tuwid na daan. Walang tuwid na daan lahat dadaan sa pasikot sikot at magulong daan bago marating ang kaunlaran at magandang estado ng bansa. Nung panahon ni Marcos ang mga rapist at drug lord firing squad ang katapat kita mo ang pangil sa batas di gaya ngayon binebeybi ang mga kriminal lalo na ang mga drug lords at rapist sa bilibid na kumpleto sa gamit parang may mansyon sa loob ng kulungan.
 
Last edited:
Sige simulan mong i-push yang petition na yan maganda yan. Gobyerno na mismo naglalabas ng mga baho nila. Di lang basta propaganda makikita mo sa social media, mas marami kang makikitang hinanaing ng taong bayan na di nailalabas ng media. Dun mo makikita yung tunay na sinisigaw ng karamihan na di nilalabas sa media. Tanong ko lang ano ang mas disente? Sugpuin ang krimen? Pagkasunduin ang gobyerno at mga rebelde at lahat ng relihiyon para mahinto ang gulo o magpamudmod ng pera na galing sa kaban ng bayan at pangungurakot?? Di pa ba kita lahat ngayon iisa ang sigaw at lahat nagkasundo mapa relihiyon, organisasyon kahit mga rebelde pa yan, iisa ang gusto nila. Wag na magpakabulag sa kunwaring tuwid na daan. Walang tuwid na daan lahat dadaan sa pasikot sikot at magulong daan bago marating ang kaunlaran at magandang estado ng bansa. Nung panahon ni Marcos ang mga rapist at drug lord firing squad ang katapat kita mo ang pangil sa batas di gaya ngayon binebeybi ang mga kriminal lalo na ang mga drug lords at rapist sa bilibid na kumpleto sa gamit parang may mansyon sa loob ng kulungan.

Call me pessimistic, pero hanggang walang pamunuan na kayang i-cleanup ang mga sangay ng gobyerno na balwarte ng katiwalian na umugat na mula sa pinakamababang posisyon hanggang sa kataas-taasan, gaya ng Customs at DPWH na ginagawang personal goldmine ng mga humahawak ng mga yan, I don't see any hope for this country.

Pangalawa, kung may pamunuan na kayang buwagin ang palakad ng artificial monopolies sa mga negosyo sa Pilipinas na hawak ng mga historical oligarchies sa Pinas, unang-una akong magmamartsa sa kalsada para magbigay pugay sa pamunuan na kakayanin yan.
 
Last edited:
Call me pessimistic, pero hanggang walang pamunuan na kayang i-cleanup ang mga sangay ng gobyerno na balwarte ng katiwalian na umugat na mula sa pinakamababang posisyon hanggang sa kataas-taasan, gaya ng Customs at DPWH na ginagawang personal goldmine ng mga humahawak ng mga yan, I don't see any hope for this country.

Pangalawa, kung may pamunuan na kayang buwagin ang palakad ng artificial monopolies sa mga negosyo sa Pilipinas na hawak ng mga historical oligarchies sa Pinas, unang-una akong magmamartsa sa kalsada para magbigay pugay sa pamunuan na kakayanin yan.

Malalaman natin yan kung masasagot lahat yan kung sino man ang mananalo ngayong halalan. Wag lang ang kagaya ni Roxas dahil isa siya sa matatamaan ng ganyang klase ng pamamalakad dahil isa ang pamilya niya sa nakikinabang sa monopoly system sa bansa. Kaya malabong suportahan nya yang ganyang uri ng sistema. Kaya di rin ako naniniwala na tatanggalin nya yung contractualization dahil sa tagal nya sa gobyerno di nya nagawa yan ngayon pinapangako nya in 3 months tanggal na daw yung batas na yun.
 
Last edited:
Malalaman natin yan kung masasagot lahat yan kung sino man ang mananalo ngayong halalan. Wag lang ang kagaya ni Roxas dahil isa siya sa matatamaan ng ganyang klase ng pamamalakad dahil isa ang pamilya niya sa nakikinabang sa monopoly system sa bansa. Kaya malabong suportahan nya yang ganyang uri ng sistema. Kaya di rin ako naniniwala na tatanggalin nya yung contractualization dahil sa tagal nya sa gobyerno di nya nagawa yan ngayon pinapangako nya in 3 months tanggal na daw yung batas na yun.

Kung alam lang ng mga tao ang mga kritikal na issues involved sa pagboto nila; iboto na nila kahit sino, wag lang si Roxas. Dahil cgurado sa kanya patuloy ang ligaya at kalakaran ng mga kauri niya sa taas. Kahit si Poe malabong may gawin yan sa issue na yan.
 
Ironic na banggitin mo ang "monopoly system" e yan mismo ang main characteristic ng crony capitalism na economic system nung panahon ni Marcos.
 
Ironic na banggitin mo ang "monopoly system" e yan mismo ang main characteristic ng crony capitalism na economic system nung panahon ni Marcos.

Pero di kagaya ngayon na puro ang mga gahamang negosyante lang ang patuloy na nakikinabang. Di gaya nun kontrolado ang presyuhan dahil hawak ng gobyerno halos lahat ng mga malalaking negosyo gaya ng meralco nung panahon nya. Ngayon malaki ang kontrol ng mga kumpanya na yan kung gusto nilang patuloy na itaas ang presyo ng mga produkto nila kahit di na makatarungan at naghihikahos na ang taong bayan di gaya nun kahit halos isang taon kaming may utang sa meralco di ka basta-basta puputulan kung talagang wala kang pangbayad. Magkaiba ng pamamalakad noon sa pamamalakad ngayon. Noon monopoly pero malaki ang pakinabang ng mga tao pero ngayon sino lang ang umaasenso? Yung mga nasa taas lang. Kahit anong pagtanggol ang gawin mo sa pamamalakad ng gobyerno ngayon walang mangyayari dahil pabor ang gobyernong to sa mga malalaking negosyante dahil dun sila nagkakapera kahit taong bayan ang sumasalo sa hirap na dinaranas na Pilipinas. Parang di ka Pilipino dahil di mo ramdam at kita ang paghihirap ngayon ng mga Pilipino.

- - - Updated - - -

Kung alam lang ng mga tao ang mga kritikal na issues involved sa pagboto nila; iboto na nila kahit sino, wag lang si Roxas. Dahil cgurado sa kanya patuloy ang ligaya at kalakaran ng mga kauri niya sa taas. Kahit si Poe malabong may gawin yan sa issue na yan.

Malamang, si Poe hawak siya ng Cojuanco kaya malabo din ang mga sinasabi nyang plataporma.
 
Hindi mo alam ang masamang epektong idinulot ng crony capitalism ni Marcos sa ekonomiya ng Pilipinas? Walang maraming Pilipino o dayuhang may gustong magnegosyo noon sa Pilipinas dahil sa strict regulation ng gobyerno sa ekonomiya. Walang free competition. Dinidikta lang ng gobyerno kung anong businesses ang pwedeng mag-operate pati ang presyo ng goods at services. Utang lang bumubuhay sa bansa noon. Malaking percent ng GDP ng bansa ay nagmumula sa utang. Wala xang kinikitang malaki mula sa industrial at service sector. Kini-criticize niyo ang "monopoly system" na nag-eexist ngaun sa ilang industries sa bansa, pero hindi niyo alam na worst of the worst ang monopoly system nung panahon ni Marcos. Un ang nagbaon sa Pilipinas sa economic stagnation, sobrang laking foreign debt at fiscal deficit sa napakahabang panahon.

Opinyon mo lang na ilan lang tao ang umaasenso ngaun. Mas mababa ang poverty at unemployment rate ngaun kesa nung panahon ni Marcos.
 
Mas maraming umaalis ng bansa ngayon para lang kumita dahil sa kahirapan dito sa Pilipinas. Ikaw ba dama mo ba ang pag asenso? Kamusta ang pasahod at kamusta ang presyo ng bilihin ngayon? Kamusta ang presyo ng bigas at krudo? Malamang wala ka pang masyadong karanasan sa mga bagay-bagay kaya ganyan.

- - - Updated - - -

sabagay wala na rin ako magagawa kung ang isang tao e nalason na ng mga dilaw na yan. Namanipula na nila lahat halos sa Pilipinas. Basta ako move on na sa nakaraan at dun na ako sa tunay na pagbabago hindi pansariling interest kundi interest para sa kapakanan ng mga Pilipino.
 
Hindi mo alam ang masamang epektong idinulot ng crony capitalism ni Marcos sa ekonomiya ng Pilipinas? Walang maraming Pilipino o dayuhang may gustong magnegosyo noon sa Pilipinas dahil sa strict regulation ng gobyerno sa ekonomiya. Walang free competition. Dinidikta lang ng gobyerno kung anong businesses ang pwedeng mag-operate pati ang presyo ng goods at services. Utang lang bumubuhay sa bansa noon. Malaking percent ng GDP ng bansa ay nagmumula sa utang. Wala xang kinikitang malaki mula sa industrial at service sector. Kini-criticize niyo ang "monopoly system" na nag-eexist ngaun sa ilang industries sa bansa, pero hindi niyo alam na worst of the worst ang monopoly system nung panahon ni Marcos. Un ang nagbaon sa Pilipinas sa economic stagnation, sobrang laking foreign debt at fiscal deficit sa napakahabang panahon.

Opinyon mo lang na ilan lang tao ang umaasenso ngaun. Mas mababa ang poverty at unemployment rate ngaun kesa nung panahon ni Marcos.

Oo nga naman, dapat yung nakaw equal share dapat. Problema kasi ni Marcos ay di sya nag share nang malaki sa mga kasab-wat nya noon, hayun tuloy inahas sya ni Enrile at Danding.
 
I believe this little piece by Adaza rightfully belongs to this thread:

================================================================
EDSA BETRAYALS – Who betrayed whom
by HOMOBONO ADAZA


“Life is queer with its twists and turns,
As every one of us sometimes learns,
And many a person turns about
When they might have won had they stuck it out.
Don’t give up though when the pace seems low…
You may succeed with another blow.”
– Anonymous​

EDSA started off on the wrong foot with betrayal of agreements. Betrayal came like an unexpected downpour from the Cory Aquino camp. I least expected it because Cory campaigned on a high moral tone and the Opposition leaders sang the same tune.

I should know, I was in the thick of it and one of those who participated, making strategic decisions long before the snap election campaign, during the campaign and after the campaign.

Betrayal of agreements
As the head of the Opposition committee that negotiated with Juan Ponce Enrile (JPE) and Fidel V. Ramos (FVR), I was the one who inked for the Opposition the agreement between JPE-FVR and the Opposition that Corazon Aquino (Cory) and Salvador H. Laurel (Doy) head the new government and JPE as secretary of National Defense and FVR as Chief of Staff head the military branch of the new government with the caveat that the Cory-Doy duo would only appoint five members of the Cabinet – National Defense, Local Government, Justice, Foreign Affairs and Finance – and the rest would be agreed upon by Cory-Doy and JPE-FVR. The Opposition leaders at the Laurel residence unanimously approved the agreement. Was it in writing? Of course not! But an agreement whether it is oral or not is an agreement that should be honored. As they say, there is honor even among thieves. Political leaders of a country should have honor better than thieves.

FIRST BETRAYAL: This agreement was never honored. While the Opposition group was meeting at the Laurel residence after the Committee and I reported what was agreed upon with JPE-FVR, without anybody’s knowledge, except probably Cory alone, two betrayers, Jose “Peping” Cojuanco and MP Ramon Mitra, Jr., met somewhere and prepared a list of the new Cabinet members in violation of the agreement.

SECOND BETRAYAL: The Opposition also agreed with JPE-FVR that the oath-taking of Cory-Doy would be the evening of that day at the Club Filipino. Consistent with that agreement, I informed my friends in the international and national media that the oath-taking would take place at the Club Filipino, under the protection of JPE-FVR. With other Opposition leaders we went to Club Filipino at the appointed time only to be told by Rene Saguisag, the appointed spokesman of Cory, that the oath-taking was postponed to the following morning. Angered by this change without prior notice, I shouted at Rene saying who the hell ordered the postponement. Rene said, “Bono, I am only a messenger here.” I replied: “By gad Rene, you cannot even observe simple agreements, how can you people expect to run a government.” Rene said nothing in reply visibly embarrassed. I went home that night in a state of rage, promising myself not to show up for the oath-taking the following day. My wife, Marge, who is a daughter of a former governor of Misamis Oriental, who has more traditional political sense than me, pushed me to attend the ceremony, and I did.

THIRD BETRAYAL: When the United Democratic Opposition (UNIDO) decided to support Cory for President, the agreement with Cory was that the type of government of Marcos would be continued, with Cory as ceremonial President, since everyone knew that Cory had no knowledge of how to run the country, and she admitted this. The joke in the course of campaign was the slogan of the Kilusang Bagong Lipunan (KBL), the party of President Marcos (FM), that Cory was TWA and this had nothing to do with the ownership of Trans-World Airways (TWA). TWA simply stands for Talagang Walang Alam which simply meant, she was ignorant of the task of government. Doy was the agreed Prime Minister with a Cabinet composed of Parliament (Batasang Pambansa) members.

Well, it did not turn out that way. Doy was, at the beginning, appointed Prime Minister, but sacked by Cory a little after. All members of the Cabinet were Peping Cojuangco and Ramon Mitra’s choices, most of whom were not members of Parliament, in violation of the Opposition-Cory agreement and JPE-FVR-Cory-Doy agreement.

FOURTH BETRAYAL: The greatest betrayal of all was the dissolution of the Parliament orchestrated by Cory and her crowd. Why was the Parliament dissolved? It was not due to the fact that Cory’s wanted to demolish a Marcos institution. It was because, if the Parliament was retained, Cory and her crowd would have only ended up in the periphery of power. Most, if not all of them, would not have wielded any significant power. They would have become outsiders of the new government that would have been dominated by UNIDO leaders, specifically the Nacionalista Party of Doy Laurel and its allies like the Concerned Citizen’s Aggrupation of Cesar Climaco, who was mayor of Zamboanga City, the Mindanao Alliance of this writer, the Bicol Saro of lawyer Salvador Princesa and the Muslim Federal of Abul Khayr Alonto.

The ranks of the Cory crowd wanted to grab power for themselves at the expense of the true Opposition, the UNIDO, which was doing it consistent with the slogan of the Nacionalista Party – Ang Bayan Higit sa Lahat (The country first above all else or the country first and foremost). Who were the suspected personalities responsible for the power grab? These were their team captain Jose “Peping” Cojuangco, Jr., the omnipresent brother of Cory; Ramon Mitra Jr., Cory’s Secretary of Agriculture and later Speaker of the House of Representatives; Jose “Joecon” Concepcion, Jr., Cory’s Secretary of Trade and Industry; Rep. Neptali Gonzales, Cory’s Secretary of Justice; Senator Jovito Salonga, Cory’s Chairman of the PCGG and later President of the Senate; Jaime Ongpin, Cory’s Secretary of Finance; Joker Arroyo, Cory’s Executive Secretary; and Father Joaquin Bernas, the consigliore of Cory’s Council of Trent.

If the Parliament was not abolished, most likely all the members of the Cory band would have been nothing in the circle of power, except Gonzales, who was a commuter between the UNIDO and the Cory train. The ones responsible for the rise of the Opposition in the country were the UNIDO and its allies. The Cory band members were not those who created the waves, they were just plain surf riders. Most of them were infinitesimal, if not silent, objectors, and many of them were plain and simple steak commandos who fought the war in the United States of America – very brave because they were thousands of miles from the scene of battles.

FIFTH BETRAYAL: This is attributable to my friend Doy Laurel and then Secretary of National Defense Juan Ponce Enrile. Why betrayal? They were the two leaders who could have prevented Cory and her band from dissolving the Parliament. Doy was the head of the most potent Opposition group in the country – the UNIDO. Johnny headed the most powerful armed component of the Republic – the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP). But they failed to fight Cory’s band of fledgling power grabbers because they were afraid of the potential of that crowd in EDSA during the uprising and the perceived power of the Cory magic. They certainly had brains but they had no balls to demolish Cory and her band which could have been easily done immediately after the order to abolish the Parliament. These two failed to fight despite their tremendous powers and this paralysis of the will amounts to a betrayal of the country whose people thought they could have better lives after the removal of Marcos. Well the people’s dreams became a nightmare because the Cory administration was a calamity and this could have been prevented if Doy and Johnny rose to the occasion but they did not.

SIXTH BETRAYAL:
Still this belongs to Doy and Johnny. Why? The duo refused to fight for the enforcement of agreements as enumerated in the preceding discussion. Had both of them insisted on the enforcement of the agreements, the Cory band could have been easily neutralized but they did not. Then, there would have been genuine democratic restoration and the calamity of the Cory administration and those that followed it could have been avoided.

SEVENTH BETRAYAL: The sole responsibility belongs to the Cory band. Before the 1987 first senatorial elections after the installation of Cory as President, it was reported that Cory told her Comelec that she wanted a majority of the 24-man Senate in the elections. Comelec committed an overkill by orchestrating the most scandalous dagdag bawas (add and subtract) elections in the history of the country. Through the effective use of computer transmissions of the election results, Comelec and Namfrel uniformly reported twenty-two senatorial candidates of Cory won and only two of the opposition Grand Alliance for Democracy (GAD) – Johnny Ponce Enrile and Erap Estrada. The true results, however, as the genuine figures of the Namfrel and Comelec showed is that only ten of the Cory candidates won and fourteen of GAD. GAD went to the Supreme Court with overwhelming evidence to reverse the false and scandalous Comelec public reports. The Cory Supreme Court dismissed the petition without requiring the notorious Comelec to file a comment or answer.

EIGHTH BETRAYAL: This one belongs to Johnny Ponce Enrile and Senator Gregorio Honasan for advancing the schedule of the coup of 1989 from December 7 to December 1. The advancing of the date was a betrayal of the agreement among the members of the coup top leadership – BGeneral Edgardo Abenina, MGeneral Jimmy Zumel and Colonel Gregorio Honasan – that the country would be governed by a National Governing Council (NGC) composed of three military men and four civilians – Johnny Ponce Enrile, the nominee of Honasan; Eduardo Cojuangco, the nominee of MJJimmy Zumel; this writer, the nominee of BG Abenina; and Vice-President Doy Laurel, by common agreement. The reason for the advancing of the coup schedule is attributable to Enrile and Honasan because Honasan wanted to install President Cory disregarding the agreement for the establishment of the NGC as the group that would rule the country because Honasan and Enrile perceived that they would be outvoted by the five of Abenina, Zumel, Laurel, Cojuango and this writer.

What might have been?
In the light of all these, everyone is left with speculations of what might have been. Well, for my part, my thesis is simple – the country would have been better off, if those who betrayed the national interests did not and, most specifically, if the coup of 1989 was not betrayed. It could have avoided the debacles of all administrations – from Cory Aquino to Noynoy Aquino.
 
Last edited:
Mas gusto mo ng martial law/dictatorship kesa democracy? Takot ang mga taong gumawa ng krimen dahil nasa ilalim ng martial law ang bansa. Ibig sabihin gobyerno ang gumagawa ng krimen o human rights violations sa halip na ordinaryong mga tao.

$300 million lang ang utang ng Pilipinas BAGO maupo si Marcos bilang pangulo. Naging $28 billion bago xa mapatalsik sa Pilipinas nung 1986. Pero ang maganda dun wala sa kaban ng bayan ang pera pero 39 years nang patuloy binabayaran ng Pilipinas at sa 2025 pa matatapos bayaran

Growing up at the later years of Marcos regime, I have to make the following observations regarding the martial law years:

  • the law-abiding citizens generally had no problems with the martial law. Kung di ka involved sa mga radicals nang panahon na to, di ka kailangan mabagabag na may kakatok sa pinto mo dyes oras ng gabi para bitbitin ka palabas ng pinto at dalhin ka ng mga authorities malamang sa hukay mo na.

  • the leftist movement and the general social unrest was not unique to the Philippines at this time. It was part of a worldwide phenomenon that swept most countries along the divide of the Cold War powers. The threat, real or unreal, left no government safe if they did not enforce measures to clamp down on perceived troublemakers of society. More or less it was a legitimate reaction from any government born of the political realities of the times. I have no data at hand, but saying that many countries, especially the South American ones like Guatemala, had had it worse than the Philippines should not be widely off the mark.

  • the ferocity of Leftist attacks in the NCR and the countryside forced the hands of Marcos and his military to resort to equally inhumane and brutal measures to counter the ambitions of the rebels. The abduction of suspects even in broad daylight was seen as desperate method to terrorize anyone thinking of joining the ranks of the rebellious faction.

  • the ballooning debt of the Philippines during the Marcos regime: also not unique, and many countries had had it worse too in this department. What occurred was that many US satellite and allied countries saw the looming threat of global communist takeover as a way to play their way to the pockets of the US-led Western alliance. During this time, almost any excuse with the line "improve economic situation of the country to dissuade the people from joining the communist cause" is guaranteed to receive loans from the western financial institutions.

  • the Marcos regime and it's actions—martial law and its abuses, overwhelming debts—regarding the events sweeping the world at this time was within normal bounds for most countries affected by the political situations of the late 60s and 70s.

Saying these, however, I have to make clear that I am no big fan of Marcos and his ways. However, we have to be objective which among his legacies we should rightfully denounce, or whether the political situations of the times rightfully warranted them.
 
^ The Philippines was relatively a safe and stable country with a wide political and economic headstart compared with the rest of Asian countries (apart from Japan) until Marcos totally fucked it up making the country from one of the more prosperous nations (the "Golden Age of the Philippines" which anachronistically attributed to the Marcos Era actually preceded that era) in the region into one with one of the most miserable ailing economies and very poor social conditions (or the rightly termed "sick man of Asia.").

The mass poverty the country has experienced for the 4 decades until now is almost entirely down to Marcos' destroying actions for his own personal financial gains, with his deliberately devaluing the strong Philippine peso to the US dollar (the exchange rate when he first took office was P3.90 = $1) in a sweet heart deal with the US and making the peso a very weak currency which was good for the US and good for Marcos but obviously devastating to the Filipinos, and his getting into deals with the US and the World Bank for the country to borrow mind boggling HUGE LOANS from these two with, again, country destroying high interest rates, interest rates that NO president in the world would accept unless they were corrupt. Great for the US as they get huge interest payments and great for Marcos, but it means a lifetime of poverty for the whole country for the next 4 decades as the Philippines struggled to pay back the countries debt, made worse by the then extremely weak peso. Marcos took out the terrible loans with plans to build a lot of infrastructure around the country. But out of billions of dollars Marcos borrowed, only about 10% of the funds made it to propaganda projects, e.g. projects like schools and hospitals that would paint him as a hero. And the remaining 90% of the money was directly pocketed by him and his cronies.

On the political side of things, Marcos used several reasons to justify the proclamation of martial law, which would mean suspending civil rights and imposing military rule. He claimed there was a communist insurgency, a rebellion by Muslim forces seeking their own independence, and the unrest in the streets from militant activists hence martial law was declared. But the communist insurgency was not a new thing in the 1970s. It had always been there since the 1940’s. In fact, Ramon Magsaysay suppressed and contained it. He did not need martial law. He needed only the military to do their job. And none of the succeeding presidents ever considered imposing martial law or dictatorship to deal with this recurring communist insurgency.

Even the conflict with Muslim rebel forces had been around for centuries before his presidency. Again, martial law was never declared to counter the rebellion or secessionist movement in Mindanao. In fact, it was under his leadership that Muslim insurgency aggravated when he commanded his military to massacre all those young Muslim recruits he instructed to infiltrate Sabah but failed.

There's no enough valid reason to justify martial law or Marcos' dictatorship. There's actually no reason to justify the Marcos Era at all. In fact, martial law gave rise to a much bigger political, economic and social woes in the long run more than it became a solution to the nation's problems at that time. If there was an alternate history where we could skip this whole messy, stagnant, disastrous era, and if we could replace Marcos with ANY of his political rivals to assume his leadership and to carry on with the development started by previous administrations and deal with the country's problems more appropriately without involving violence and suppression of freedom, the Philippines would have been on the same economic ground as Taiwan or, at least, Malaysia today, with much much less corruption and bureaucracy imbued in our political culture. The Philippines is the first to liberate and the first democracy in Asia, had the advantage of being one of the first to develop economically and industrialize, and had received a decade-long of training on good governance from the US. But Marcos deliberately ruined it all. It's so embarrassing that we are now just virtually on the same standing as the communist country of Vietnam, the exact phenomenon Marcos had supposedly prevented from happening to this country.
 
^
The trouble with people trying to assess the Marcos years is looking at the whole thing through the filters of propaganda set up by his sworn enemies out to destroy any iota of legacy that could be rightfully traced to the man. You cannot be a true judge of history using lenses colored by such assessment bias beforehand.

For starters, it is easily forgotten that the years before the proclamation of martial law on September 22, 1972 (Proclamation No. 1081), the Marcos presidency went about its business of governance as any decent government would. It is unfortunate that the deluge of bad propaganda has made people easily forget this fact. In 1972 Marcos was at the tail end of his second term, having been the president for two relatively decent, if not totally outstanding (depending on who you consult, of course) terms: 1966–1969 and 1969–1972. When people say Marcos has fucked up the nation, they made it appear like he’s been at it all his years at the head of government, as if Marcos came up with martial law right from the start of his presidency, when in fact it only covered the years 1972–1981—for a total of nine years—the year he lifted the martial law.

As for fucking up the nation, again, it takes two to tango: put yourself in the place of Marcos and see if you could properly attend to the business of governance while the communists were everywhere disrupting society as it was, creating and stirring up false discontent in order to recruit in their ranks the numbers necessary to overthrow the government. I doubt even a Lincoln could have saved the Philippines under the situation. The communists made sure government funds and resources were redirected from their proper targets—projects aimed at national improvement—and instead using the funds to now contain the rebellious groups all over the country. It is not beyond the communists to use every weapon and means at their disposal to achieve their ends. It is nothing for them to push people to misery in order to convince these same people to enlist in the communist movement. It is evident in the conduct of leftist labor unions like the KMU, who would infiltrate companies, set up labor unions, demand unreasonable CBAs, looking forward to paralyze and close down the company and increase the misery of the people and have them turn their eyes against the government.

As I mentioned in my previous post, you cannot isolate Marcos’s decision to declare martial law as unique to the country. It has to be seen in the context of the times. It would be irresponsible to ignore the events transpiring in other parts of the world and put all the blame squarely on the shoulders of Marcos. When communism was threatening to overrun the world, placing despots left and right in South America, Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia, dividing Germany and Korea, it made the nature of governing a very precarious thing, to say the least. It is a well-documented fact that international political paranoia has never been at a higher level than it was at this period, and Marcos was not an exemption to this. In my book, Marcos was as much a victim of the times as much as those other heads of state who failed miserably in this period. It would be a misplaced reading of history if we fail to blame the communist troublemakers (and their financiers) who made sure no government would function properly under their influence.
 
Last edited:
Tang ina mga taga yellow yan tang ina talaga mga yello na yan sila na naman ang gagawa ng maling hakbang ngaung bagong administrasyon pansinin niu
 
^
The trouble with people trying to assess the Marcos years is looking at the whole thing through the filters of propaganda set up by his sworn enemies out to destroy any iota of legacy that could be rightfully traced to the man. You cannot be a true judge of history using lenses colored by such assessment bias beforehand.

For starters, it is easily forgotten that the years before the proclamation of martial law on September 22, 1972 (Proclamation No. 1081), the Marcos presidency went about its business of governance as any decent government would. It is unfortunate that the deluge of bad propaganda has made people easily forget this fact. In 1972 Marcos was at the tail end of his second term, having been the president for two relatively decent, if not totally outstanding (depending on who you consult, of course) terms: 1966–1969 and 1969–1972. When people say Marcos has fucked up the nation, they made it appear like he’s been at it all his years at the head of government, as if Marcos came up with martial law right from the start of his presidency, when in fact it only covered the years 1972–1981—for a total of nine years—the year he lifted the martial law.

As for fucking up the nation, again, it takes two to tango: put yourself in the place of Marcos and see if you could properly attend to the business of governance while the communists were everywhere disrupting society as it was, creating and stirring up false discontent in order to recruit in their ranks the numbers necessary to overthrow the government. I doubt even a Lincoln could have saved the Philippines under the situation. The communists made sure government funds and resources were redirected from their proper targets—projects aimed at national improvement—and instead using the funds to now contain the rebellious groups all over the country. It is not beyond the communists to use every weapon and means at their disposal to achieve their ends. It is nothing for them to push people to misery in order to convince these same people to enlist in the communist movement. It is evident in the conduct of leftist labor unions like the KMU, who would infiltrate companies, set up labor unions, demand unreasonable CBAs, looking forward to paralyze and close down the company and increase the misery of the people and have them turn their eyes against the government.

As I mentioned in my previous post, you cannot isolate Marcos’s decision to declare martial law as unique to the country. It has to be seen in the context of the times. It would be irresponsible to ignore the events transpiring in other parts of the world and put all the blame squarely on the shoulders of Marcos. When communism was threatening to overrun the world, placing despots left and right in South America, Vietnam, Laos and Cambodia, dividing Germany and Korea, it made the nature of governing a very precarious thing, to say the least. It is a well-documented fact that international political paranoia has never been at a higher level than it was at this period, and Marcos was not an exemption to this. In my book, Marcos was as much a victim of the times as much as those other heads of state who failed miserably in this period. It would be a misplaced reading of history if we fail to blame the communist troublemakers (and their financiers) who made sure no government would function properly under their influence.

Do you really think that I'm not aware of this basic semi-factual information (in bold) in your post?

Marcos was nearing the end of his second term, of which there was already growing discontent for his administration among the public and he didn’t want to go out of the limelight yet so decided to go extra constitutional and declared martial law. And that’s how things got to this point.

The communist threat you're speaking of was not even critical in the Philippines during Marcos time. In fact, there were only about 60 NPA members (who were only remnants of the Huks, the original communist movement in the Philippines) in 1969 when it started its operation, and their number rose to mere 350 in 1971, the year in which martial law was declared. There was absolutely NO communist threat large enough to topple the government during Marcos' time. It was only exaggerated by Marcos regime to provide excuse to declare martial law.

https://web.stanford.edu/group/mappingmilitants/cgi-bin/groups/view/149

http://www.britannica.com/topic/New-Peoples-Army

The height of communist uprising was never during Marcos time but in the 1950s. The armed communist group back then was the Hukbalahap, the predecessor of the NPA. but they were eventually defeated by Ramon Magsaysay without imposing martial law or tolerating military abuse.

The only plausible way for the communists to take over the government in the Philippines was if Ninoy Aquino became the president and actually let the Communist Party of the Philippines run for election since there were only very few of them during that time.

Marcos declared martial law only for ONE reason and that is to strengthen his hold on power and remove his political opponents from the equation. I'll say it again. There's no justification for martial law and no justification for one man to rule the Philippines for 21 years. All justifications were bogus and incidents were only created to buttress the argument for martial law.

Sorry but your failed attempt to whitewash the history of martial law and justify Marcos' indefensible actions and even paint him as a 'victim' is pathetic and disgusting.
 
Growing up at the later years of Marcos regime, I have to make the following observations regarding the martial law years:

  • the law-abiding citizens generally had no problems with the martial law. Kung di ka involved sa mga radicals nang panahon na to, di ka kailangan mabagabag na may kakatok sa pinto mo dyes oras ng gabi para bitbitin ka palabas ng pinto at dalhin ka ng mga authorities malamang sa hukay mo na.

  • the leftist movement and the general social unrest was not unique to the Philippines at this time. It was part of a worldwide phenomenon that swept most countries along the divide of the Cold War powers. The threat, real or unreal, left no government safe if they did not enforce measures to clamp down on perceived troublemakers of society. More or less it was a legitimate reaction from any government born of the political realities of the times. I have no data at hand, but saying that many countries, especially the South American ones like Guatemala, had had it worse than the Philippines should not be widely off the mark.

  • the ferocity of Leftist attacks in the NCR and the countryside forced the hands of Marcos and his military to resort to equally inhumane and brutal measures to counter the ambitions of the rebels. The abduction of suspects even in broad daylight was seen as desperate method to terrorize anyone thinking of joining the ranks of the rebellious faction.

  • the ballooning debt of the Philippines during the Marcos regime: also not unique, and many countries had had it worse too in this department. What occurred was that many US satellite and allied countries saw the looming threat of global communist takeover as a way to play their way to the pockets of the US-led Western alliance. During this time, almost any excuse with the line "improve economic situation of the country to dissuade the people from joining the communist cause" is guaranteed to receive loans from the western financial institutions.

  • the Marcos regime and it's actions—martial law and its abuses, overwhelming debts—regarding the events sweeping the world at this time was within normal bounds for most countries affected by the political situations of the late 60s and 70s.

Saying these, however, I have to make clear that I am no big fan of Marcos and his ways. However, we have to be objective which among his legacies we should rightfully denounce, or whether the political situations of the times rightfully warranted them.

You forgot about the part where you could die when people framed you for being an activist.
I guess you really like to cherry-pick events during Marcos' regime

- - - Updated - - -

eto pa..pandagdag sa video...panoorin nyo na lang yung mga idiot aquino followers jan :)

https://web.facebook.com/Flippinflips-564634230340328/videos?fref=photo

He would've sounded more convincing if the videos were made before election year.

In other words: HULI SI PROPAGANDA BOY!

EDIT: Oh, my mistake. It seems that the blog was some kind of Pro Miriam campaign. Truth is that I like Miraim. I think she's great, and probably the best candidate of them all.
But let's face it, she aint winning shit.
 
Last edited:
Yung pagka paranoid nyu, yan yung ikababagsak nang Pilipinas. haha Di nyu na alam kung neutral or biased ng isang opinion/post.
 
Back
Top Bottom